Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Democrats cheat and lie at everything because they know the super-liberal american press will always look the other way.
Limbaugh says Biden acceptance speech was NOT live. Was on tape and edited.
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
Limbaugh is a heroin addict.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Virtual human, virtual persona, or digital clone is the creation or re-creation of a human being in image and voice using computer-generated imagery and sound, that is often indistinguishable from the real actor. Wikipedia
Virtual actor - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org › wiki › Virtual_actor
A virtual human, virtual persona, or digital clone is the creation or re-creation of a human being in image and voice using computer-generated imagery and sound, that is often indistinguishable from the real actor. This idea was first portrayed in the 1981 film Looker, wherein models had ... in movies are known as synthespians, virtual actors, vactors, cyberstars, ...
Reality bites: are virtual actors about to put Hollywood's ...www.theguardian.com › film › may › are-virtual-actors...
May 25, 2020 - A top acting agency has just added virtual celebrity Miquela to their books.
In the age of deepfakes, could virtual actors put humans out of ...www.theguardian.com › film › jul › in-the-age-of-deep...
Jul 8, 2019 - Digital and digitally altered humans are commonplace in modern cinema. Recent examples include de-aging actors such as Samuel L Jackson in Captain Marvel, and Sean Young's image in Blade Runner 2049.
The Virtual Actor: Hollywood's New Leading Man | Control ...controlforever.com › read › rise-of-virtual-actors
Dec 14, 2017 - Soon, casting directors may not need to sign A-list actors for their next big film; they might just need a good computer. Of course, this is all thanks ...
Brave new world for virtual actors
Herds of virtual dinosaurs were whipped up for the “Jurassic Park” movies of the 1990s, and this year, the movie “Simone” was founded on the premise that a ...
Virtual actors: Cheaper, better, faster than humans? | ZDNetwww.zdnet.com › article › virtual-actors-cheaper-better...
Jun 15, 1998 - Movies like Titanic are using virtual extras instead of actors to populate scenes and perform deadly stunts. And John Wayne and Fred Astaire, ...
VIRTUAL ACTORS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ...i
See generally Internet Movie Database, Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, at ... virtual actors have gone from short sequences in a live-action movie, such as the “stained ...
by A Faier - Cited by 6 - Related articles
Virtual Actors -
She is not real, but merely a virtual actor (VActor). She is a sample of the virtual characters ... Feel free to reference any movies you have seen that use VActors.
Sounds like fiction.
Heard any fictional News lately?
Virtual actor - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org › wiki › Virtual_actor
A virtual human, virtual persona, or digital clone is the creation or re-creation of a human being in image and voice using computer-generated imagery and sound, that is often indistinguishable from the real actor. This idea was first portrayed in the 1981 film Looker, wherein models had ... in movies are known as synthespians, virtual actors, vactors, cyberstars, ...
Reality bites: are virtual actors about to put Hollywood's ...www.theguardian.com › film › may › are-virtual-actors...
May 25, 2020 - A top acting agency has just added virtual celebrity Miquela to their books.
In the age of deepfakes, could virtual actors put humans out of ...www.theguardian.com › film › jul › in-the-age-of-deep...
Jul 8, 2019 - Digital and digitally altered humans are commonplace in modern cinema. Recent examples include de-aging actors such as Samuel L Jackson in Captain Marvel, and Sean Young's image in Blade Runner 2049.
The Virtual Actor: Hollywood's New Leading Man | Control ...controlforever.com › read › rise-of-virtual-actors
Dec 14, 2017 - Soon, casting directors may not need to sign A-list actors for their next big film; they might just need a good computer. Of course, this is all thanks ...
Brave new world for virtual actors
Herds of virtual dinosaurs were whipped up for the “Jurassic Park” movies of the 1990s, and this year, the movie “Simone” was founded on the premise that a ...
Virtual actors: Cheaper, better, faster than humans? | ZDNetwww.zdnet.com › article › virtual-actors-cheaper-better...
Jun 15, 1998 - Movies like Titanic are using virtual extras instead of actors to populate scenes and perform deadly stunts. And John Wayne and Fred Astaire, ...
VIRTUAL ACTORS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ...i
See generally Internet Movie Database, Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, at ... virtual actors have gone from short sequences in a live-action movie, such as the “stained ...
by A Faier - Cited by 6 - Related articles
Virtual Actors -
She is not real, but merely a virtual actor (VActor). She is a sample of the virtual characters ... Feel free to reference any movies you have seen that use VActors.
Sounds like fiction.
Heard any fictional News lately?
PROVE HIM WRONG, INSTEAD CHILDISH, BULLSHIT AD HOMS....
He did not say what you claimed.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
and dying of stage 4 lung cancer
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
prove a negative? you must be a christ stain
“In fact, as this ABC News report confirms, there were roughly three-dozen reporters present—along with TV camera crews and Secret Service agents—at the Chase Center in downtown Wilmington, Del. to watch Biden give his speech in person.“
https://www.mediaite.com/election-2...-of-journalists-watched-him-give-it-live/amp/
Stupid and gullible Rush-ites are the same stupid and gullible Trumptards.
https://www.mediaite.com/election-2...-of-journalists-watched-him-give-it-live/amp/
Stupid and gullible Rush-ites are the same stupid and gullible Trumptards.
A spoiled child's word carries more weight than Limbaugh.
The future of fake news: don't believe everything you read, see or hear
A new breed of video and audio manipulation tools allow for the creation of realistic looking news footage, like the now infamous fake Obama speech
The University of Washington’s Synthesizing Obama project took audio from one of Obama’s speeches and used it to animate his face in an entirely different video
In an age of Photoshop, filters and social media, many of us are used to seeing manipulated pictures – subjects become slimmer and smoother or, in the case of Snapchat, transformed into puppies.
However, there’s a new breed of video and audio manipulation tools, made possible by advances in artificial intelligence and computer graphics, that will allow for the creation of realistic looking footage of public figures appearing to say, well, anything. Trump declaring his proclivity for water sports. Hillary Clinton describing the stolen children she keeps locked in her wine cellar. Tom Cruise finally admitting what we suspected all along … that he’s a Brony.
This is the future of fake news. We’ve long been told not to believe everything we read, but soon we’ll have to question everything we see and hear as well.
For now, there are several research teams working on capturing and synthesizing different visual and and audio elements of human behavior.
Software developed at Stanford University is able to manipulate video footage of public figures to allow a second person to put words in their mouth – in real time. Face2Face captures the second person’s facial expressions as they talk into a webcam and then morphs those movements directly onto the face of the person in the original video. The research team demonstrated their technology by puppeteering videos of George W Bush, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
On its own, Face2Face is a fun plaything for creating memes and entertaining late night talk show hosts. However, with the addition of a synthesized voice, it becomes more convincing – not only does the digital puppet look like the politician, but it can also sound like the politician.
A research team at the University of Alabama at Birmingham has been working on voice impersonation. With 3-5 minutes of audio of a victim’s voice – taken live or from YouTube videos or radio shows – an attacker can create a synthesized voice that can fool both humans and voice biometric security systems used by some banks and smartphones. The attacker can then talk into a microphone and the software will convert it so that the words sound like they are being spoken by the victim – whether that’s over the phone or on a radio show.
Canadian startup Lyrebird has developed similar capabilities, which it says can be used to turn text into on-the-spot audiobooks “read” by famous voices or for characters in video games.
Although their intentions may be well-meaning, voice-morphing technology could be combined with face-morphing technology to create convincing fake statements by public figures.
You only have to look at the University of Washington’s Synthesizing Obama project, where they took the audio from one of Obama’s speeches and used it to animate his face in an entirely different video with incredible accuracy (thanks to training a recurrent neural network with hours of footage), to get a sense of how insidious these adulterations can be.
Beyond fake news there are many other implications, said Nitesh Saxena, associate professor and research director of the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s department of computer science. “You could leave fake voice messages posing as someone’s mum. Or defame someone and post the audio samples online.”
These morphing technologies aren’t yet perfect. The facial expressions in the videos can seem a little distorted or unnatural and the voices can sound a little robotic.
But given time, they will be able to faithfully recreate the sound or appearance of a person – to the point where it might be very difficult for humans to detect the fraud.
Given the erosion of trust in the media and the rampant spread of hoaxes via social media, it will become even more important for news organizations to scrutinize content that looks and sounds like the real deal.
Telltale signs will be where the video or audio was created, who else was at the event and whether the weather conditions match the records of that day.
People should also be looking at the lighting and shadows in the video, whether all of the elements featured in the frame are the right size, and whether the audio is synced perfectly, said Mandy Jenkins, from social news company Storyful, which specializes in verifying news content.
Doctored content might not pass the scrutiny of a rigorous newsroom, but if posted as a grainy video to social media it could spread virally and trigger a public relations, political or diplomatic disaster. Imagine Trump declaring war on North Korea, for example.
“If someone looks like Trump and speaks like Trump they will think it’s Trump,” said Saxena.
“We already see it doesn’t even take doctored audio or video to make people believe something that isn’t true,” added Jenkins. “This has the potential to make it worse.”
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...-obama-video-trump-face2face-doctored-content
A new breed of video and audio manipulation tools allow for the creation of realistic looking news footage, like the now infamous fake Obama speech
The University of Washington’s Synthesizing Obama project took audio from one of Obama’s speeches and used it to animate his face in an entirely different video
In an age of Photoshop, filters and social media, many of us are used to seeing manipulated pictures – subjects become slimmer and smoother or, in the case of Snapchat, transformed into puppies.
However, there’s a new breed of video and audio manipulation tools, made possible by advances in artificial intelligence and computer graphics, that will allow for the creation of realistic looking footage of public figures appearing to say, well, anything. Trump declaring his proclivity for water sports. Hillary Clinton describing the stolen children she keeps locked in her wine cellar. Tom Cruise finally admitting what we suspected all along … that he’s a Brony.
This is the future of fake news. We’ve long been told not to believe everything we read, but soon we’ll have to question everything we see and hear as well.
For now, there are several research teams working on capturing and synthesizing different visual and and audio elements of human behavior.
Software developed at Stanford University is able to manipulate video footage of public figures to allow a second person to put words in their mouth – in real time. Face2Face captures the second person’s facial expressions as they talk into a webcam and then morphs those movements directly onto the face of the person in the original video. The research team demonstrated their technology by puppeteering videos of George W Bush, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
On its own, Face2Face is a fun plaything for creating memes and entertaining late night talk show hosts. However, with the addition of a synthesized voice, it becomes more convincing – not only does the digital puppet look like the politician, but it can also sound like the politician.
A research team at the University of Alabama at Birmingham has been working on voice impersonation. With 3-5 minutes of audio of a victim’s voice – taken live or from YouTube videos or radio shows – an attacker can create a synthesized voice that can fool both humans and voice biometric security systems used by some banks and smartphones. The attacker can then talk into a microphone and the software will convert it so that the words sound like they are being spoken by the victim – whether that’s over the phone or on a radio show.
Canadian startup Lyrebird has developed similar capabilities, which it says can be used to turn text into on-the-spot audiobooks “read” by famous voices or for characters in video games.
Although their intentions may be well-meaning, voice-morphing technology could be combined with face-morphing technology to create convincing fake statements by public figures.
You only have to look at the University of Washington’s Synthesizing Obama project, where they took the audio from one of Obama’s speeches and used it to animate his face in an entirely different video with incredible accuracy (thanks to training a recurrent neural network with hours of footage), to get a sense of how insidious these adulterations can be.
Beyond fake news there are many other implications, said Nitesh Saxena, associate professor and research director of the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s department of computer science. “You could leave fake voice messages posing as someone’s mum. Or defame someone and post the audio samples online.”
These morphing technologies aren’t yet perfect. The facial expressions in the videos can seem a little distorted or unnatural and the voices can sound a little robotic.
But given time, they will be able to faithfully recreate the sound or appearance of a person – to the point where it might be very difficult for humans to detect the fraud.
Given the erosion of trust in the media and the rampant spread of hoaxes via social media, it will become even more important for news organizations to scrutinize content that looks and sounds like the real deal.
Telltale signs will be where the video or audio was created, who else was at the event and whether the weather conditions match the records of that day.
People should also be looking at the lighting and shadows in the video, whether all of the elements featured in the frame are the right size, and whether the audio is synced perfectly, said Mandy Jenkins, from social news company Storyful, which specializes in verifying news content.
Doctored content might not pass the scrutiny of a rigorous newsroom, but if posted as a grainy video to social media it could spread virally and trigger a public relations, political or diplomatic disaster. Imagine Trump declaring war on North Korea, for example.
“If someone looks like Trump and speaks like Trump they will think it’s Trump,” said Saxena.
“We already see it doesn’t even take doctored audio or video to make people believe something that isn’t true,” added Jenkins. “This has the potential to make it worse.”
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...-obama-video-trump-face2face-doctored-content
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
wish he was dead
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
HAHAHA. ABC said that so it must be true??? They lied about jussie and bubba and george floyd.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
It's possible the Biden speech was taped and edited. It's possible he did it live. Proving which actually happened is going to be a bit more difficult. And, just because there were people present when he gave it doesn't mean it wasn't time delayed and edited. But with people present it would be harder to do that.
BartenderElite
Verified User
This was inevitable.
Conservatives spent months building Biden up to be a doddering fool, who would babble incoherently through this speech. They were relentless w/ that message.
He shows up & hits it out of the park. Of course they have to switch to "it was taped!" on a dime.
Conservatives spent months building Biden up to be a doddering fool, who would babble incoherently through this speech. They were relentless w/ that message.
He shows up & hits it out of the park. Of course they have to switch to "it was taped!" on a dime.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I thought Biden's speech was lame. It was just a regurgitation of the same stuff he's been spewing for weeks. Taped or live, it was nothing history is going to note as unique or worth remembering.