Limit the number of a member's concurrent threads

ThatOwlWoman said:
I bet I can guess who. I put him on ignore for that reason. That made the forum quite a bit more pleasant, readable, and usable. @Damocles used to have a rule limiting the # of threads one individual could start in a day, but that seems to be gone now. Legion/Lionfish/Trump Admin is a major attention whore who tries desperately to dominate the forum.
Click to expand...
Legina is deteriorating. The fact he never returned to his Legion account after his hissy fit is the funniest thing about him. :ROFLMAO: :rofl2::ROFLMAO:

Ban Hammer said:
Legion has violated rule 12b and because of his being very familiar with the rule he is banned for 7 days.
Click to expand...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's now on page 3 of "What's new". Threads started by your friend The Trump Administration AKA Legina.

New posts

www.justplainpolitics.com www.justplainpolitics.com
Click to expand...
iu
 
Lionfish said:
View attachment 37653
Click to expand...


It's not new; it's been their ethos from the beginning.

What they SAY they want is to avoid seeing my threads, which they admit they can do by using the ignore function.

But that's not what they want, is it?

They WANT to keep anyone else from seeing my threads, too.

The question is, why?

Do "too many threads" hurt anyone or anything?

If so, how?

I don't recall any protests from the usual suspects when I was posing as a Kamala Harris shill...do you?

A final note: what they are demanding is a limit on everybody's ability to post more than 10 threads a day.

They really only want the limit to apply to me, but I doubt that Damocles (who's now supposed to be me, BTW) would even consider that option.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I bet I can guess who. I put him on ignore for that reason. That made the forum quite a bit more pleasant, readable, and usable. @Damocles used to have a rule limiting the # of threads one individual could start in a day, but that seems to be gone now. Legion/Lionfish/Trump Admin is a major attention whore who tries desperately to dominate the forum.
Click to expand...
Twatwaddles have yet to understand the option to,

1734028911605.png
 
Lionfish said:
Twatwaddles have yet to understand the option to,
Click to expand...


They understand it; they just don't want to use it, apparently.

Recently they were crying about the dying man's being asked not to spam people's notifications in this thread:

https://justplainpolitics.com/threads/i-suggest-a-real-quote-box-altering-rule.221760/

Damocles told everybody affected by it to use the Ignore function.


Damocles said:
You can put the folks you dislike on ignore, you know that right?
Click to expand...


So, that's the appropriate solution to this "problem", too, right?
 
TOP said:
I think that's been suggested by several posters.... That seems to be what would work perfectly in this situation.... As long as it's not that oft claimed fake ignore....;)
Click to expand...


Were you here when the Sob Sisters henpecked Damocles into making it possible to selectively ban people they didn't like from posting in their threads?

I can add details if you don't know.
 
TOP said:
I think that's been suggested by several posters.... That seems to be what would work perfectly in this situation.... As long as it's not that oft claimed fake ignore....;)
Click to expand...

Too bad "teacher" can't read. Ask your liquor store clerk to read this to you, Twatmuffin. lol
"ThatOwlWoman said:
I bet I can guess who. I put him on ignore for that reason. That made the forum quite a bit more pleasant, readable, and usable. ""
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top