Limit the number of a member's concurrent threads

[Diogenes]

Triggered Lizard: It's fine if you want unchecked posting freedoms.

Thanks for your support in this matter.

 

[Goyboy]

20 is quite excessive. It should be limited to 10 or less. Holy fucking Spamoli, Legion!
I dub thee Spamoli.

Less.

 

[Diogenes]

Less.

So much butthurt from people who -last time I checked - claimed to have me "on ignore".

Odd, ain't it?

What's the issue?

 

[Damocles]

I click on New Posts and this is what I see:

 

[Damocles]

There is one post from "The Trump Administration"... Not 20...

 

[Damocles]

After scrolling past the two sticky threads in Current Events I see this;




this has two posts from The Trump Administration, not 20 and certainly not covering the page. This is about the same thing I saw this morning....

I do not see the issue.

 

[Diogenes]

Prolific posting provokes progressive pout-rage.

I like it.

 

[goat]

After scrolling past the two sticky threads in Current Events I see this;

View attachment 37670


this has two posts from The Trump Administration, not 20 and certainly not covering the page. This is about the same thing I saw this morning....

I do not see the issue.

The issue is members are tired of spam.

 

[Diogenes]

The issue is members are tired of spam.

Then quit eating it.

 

[Diogenes]

If any of the whiners think I'm breaking a forum rule, report the thread.

I'm sure Damocles will welcome your feedback and give each and every complaint the consideration it merits.

Otherwise, use the ignore function.

 

[martin]

After scrolling past the two sticky threads in Current Events I see this;

View attachment 37670


this has two posts from The Trump Administration, not 20 and certainly not covering the page. This is about the same thing I saw this morning....

I do not see the issue.

Not what I saw this morning. Wouldn't have made the suggestion if the threads weren't there. But at this point let it go.

 

[goat]

Then quit eating it.

Quit closing money making threads.

 

[Diogenes]

Quit closing money making threads.

Are you OK? I don't have either the ability or the desire to close a thread, and if you think Damocles makes money from that Top thread whose only purpose was to annoy Fowl, ask him.

 

[Diogenes]

Not what I saw this morning.

Problem?

 

[Matt Dillon]

Prolific posting provokes progressive pout-rage.

I like it.

 

[Diogenes]

View attachment 37671

Unironically calls me a spammer.

 

[goat]

Are you OK? I don't have either the ability or the desire to close a thread, and if you think Damocles makes money from that Top thread whose only purpose was to annoy Fowl, ask him.

Keep posting your spam if you think it keeps members. 40,000 posts TOP was closed twice because the Bowel movement demanded it. Good luck with your hobby.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Unironically calls me a spammer.

Yeah, ya know, because I post an OP once in awhile that I think is relevant and noone else is talking about, Shitbird.
We are not the same.

 

[Diogenes]

Keep posting your spam if you think it keeps members.

Unless you can prove that Top's thread "kept" members on JPP because it was open, or "lost" members leaving JPP because it was closed, maybe you should sit down.

 

[Diogenes]

Yeah, ya know, because I post an OP once in a while that I think is relevant and noone else is talking about, Shitbird. We are not the same.

I don't recall complaining about any of your threads.

I also don't remember asking Daddy Damocles to ration your ability to post as many threads as you like, so, we are not the same.

Are we?