List of black victims of cop brutality/abuse for committing traffic infractions

[gfm7175]

People who are being arrested are innocent until the courts decide. Cops have beaten and abused blacks for traffic infractions. They have done it with regularity. This big problem was created by the invention of cell phones. Blacks and minorities have claimed the cops were treating them like pinatas for decades and without proof, the whities simply denied it. Now it is shown and whities still deny it. It is amazing.

I invite all on this forum to provide me with a list of black victims of cop brutality/abuse for committing simple traffic violations. It should be very easy to do, since cops "regularly do it"...


EDIT:
Current list of names:
Rossano V. Gerald?? (no police account of the event)

 

[Evmetro]

Where is Nordberg?

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Blacks are almost twice as likely to be pulled over as whites — even though whites drive more on average, by the way. We also discovered that blacks are more likely to be searched following a stop. Just by getting in a car, a black driver has about twice the odds of being pulled over, and about four times the odds of being searched. Hispanic drivers, overall, are no more likely than whites to be pulled over, but much more likely to be searched.

In the late-1990s, the concept of “driving while black” began getting national attention. North Carolina became the first state to mandate the collection of traffic stops data in 1999, thanks in large part to efforts by black representatives in the state legislature.

The database includes information on why the driver was pulled over, the outcome of the stop and demographic information about the driver. It also has an anonymous identification number for each officer as well as the time of the stop and the police agency that conducted it.

The initial law focused only on the State Highway Patrol, but it was expanded two years later to cover almost every police agency in the state. As a result, we have a record of virtually every traffic stop in the state since 2002.

AD

The idea was to settle once and for all if “driving while black” was a legitimate grievance. The bill passed with bipartisan support and with the blessing of the leadership of the Highway Patrol. Editorials suggested either it would disprove the ugly allegations of bias, or that police leaders would take immediate steps to resolve any issues the data might reveal. The law also mandated that the state issue periodic reports analyzing the data.


None of this has occurred

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-stops-can-tell-us-about-driving-while-black/

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Blacks are almost twice as likely to be pulled over as whites — even though whites drive more on average, by the way. We also discovered that blacks are more likely to be searched following a stop. Just by getting in a car, a black driver has about twice the odds of being pulled over, and about four times the odds of being searched. Hispanic drivers, overall, are no more likely than whites to be pulled over, but much more likely to be searched.

In the late-1990s, the concept of “driving while black” began getting national attention. North Carolina became the first state to mandate the collection of traffic stops data in 1999, thanks in large part to efforts by black representatives in the state legislature.

The database includes information on why the driver was pulled over, the outcome of the stop and demographic information about the driver. It also has an anonymous identification number for each officer as well as the time of the stop and the police agency that conducted it.

The initial law focused only on the State Highway Patrol, but it was expanded two years later to cover almost every police agency in the state. As a result, we have a record of virtually every traffic stop in the state since 2002.

AD

The idea was to settle once and for all if “driving while black” was a legitimate grievance. The bill passed with bipartisan support and with the blessing of the leadership of the Highway Patrol. Editorials suggested either it would disprove the ugly allegations of bias, or that police leaders would take immediate steps to resolve any issues the data might reveal. The law also mandated that the state issue periodic reports analyzing the data.


None of this has occurred

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-stops-can-tell-us-about-driving-while-black/

your desperation is showing, divisive jew.

 

[gfm7175]

Where is Nordberg?

Obviously, he ran away.

This is what he is doing ----

 

[gfm7175]

Blacks are almost twice as likely to be pulled over as whites — even though whites drive more on average, by the way. We also discovered that blacks are more likely to be searched following a stop. Just by getting in a car, a black driver has about twice the odds of being pulled over, and about four times the odds of being searched. Hispanic drivers, overall, are no more likely than whites to be pulled over, but much more likely to be searched.

In the late-1990s, the concept of “driving while black” began getting national attention. North Carolina became the first state to mandate the collection of traffic stops data in 1999, thanks in large part to efforts by black representatives in the state legislature.

The database includes information on why the driver was pulled over, the outcome of the stop and demographic information about the driver. It also has an anonymous identification number for each officer as well as the time of the stop and the police agency that conducted it.

The initial law focused only on the State Highway Patrol, but it was expanded two years later to cover almost every police agency in the state. As a result, we have a record of virtually every traffic stop in the state since 2002.

AD

The idea was to settle once and for all if “driving while black” was a legitimate grievance. The bill passed with bipartisan support and with the blessing of the leadership of the Highway Patrol. Editorials suggested either it would disprove the ugly allegations of bias, or that police leaders would take immediate steps to resolve any issues the data might reveal. The law also mandated that the state issue periodic reports analyzing the data.


None of this has occurred

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-stops-can-tell-us-about-driving-while-black/

Splendid... All the more reason for how this list ought to be super lengthy...

Start naming names...

 

[gfm7175]

your desperation is showing, divisive jew.

Precisely... Notice how he completely dodged the OP and did not list any names for me?

 

[Truth Detector]

Blacks are almost twice as likely to be pulled over as whites — even though whites drive more on average, by the way. We also discovered that blacks are more likely to be searched following a stop. Just by getting in a car, a black driver has about twice the odds of being pulled over, and about four times the odds of being searched. Hispanic drivers, overall, are no more likely than whites to be pulled over, but much more likely to be searched.

In the late-1990s, the concept of “driving while black” began getting national attention. North Carolina became the first state to mandate the collection of traffic stops data in 1999, thanks in large part to efforts by black representatives in the state legislature.

The database includes information on why the driver was pulled over, the outcome of the stop and demographic information about the driver. It also has an anonymous identification number for each officer as well as the time of the stop and the police agency that conducted it.

The initial law focused only on the State Highway Patrol, but it was expanded two years later to cover almost every police agency in the state. As a result, we have a record of virtually every traffic stop in the state since 2002.

AD

The idea was to settle once and for all if “driving while black” was a legitimate grievance. The bill passed with bipartisan support and with the blessing of the leadership of the Highway Patrol. Editorials suggested either it would disprove the ugly allegations of bias, or that police leaders would take immediate steps to resolve any issues the data might reveal. The law also mandated that the state issue periodic reports analyzing the data.


None of this has occurred

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-stops-can-tell-us-about-driving-while-black/

Does it ever occur to race hustling dumbfucks like you that perhaps the black community has brought that on by themselves? The notion that cops are just pulling over people merely due to their skin color and not due to a traffic violation or shooting blacks merely because they are black is asinine, it is stupid, it is destructive, dangerous and an attempt to avoid the REAL problems in the black community.

When 10% of the population commits 63% of the crimes in the nation, it is illustrative of a serious problem within the black community.

So what are the causes? Teenage pregnancies; drugs; high school dropouts; and gang violence. As a black living in a Democratically controlled urban shit hole, you are 98% more likely to get shot by another young black man than you are a cop. The cops, in fact, are the only one's standing between a young black murderer and an innocent black victim. Those are FACTS. Not stupid talking points built on false narratives and memes.

So how does the black community respond to lie filled narratives promoted by PHONY media and dishonest politicians in the Party of the Jackass? They burn and loot their cities. That is a recipe for failure. Only the most dishonest and willful morons defend this bullshit. You're a moron on steroids.

guAno
noun
gua·no | \ ˈgwä-(ˌ)nō
: a fertilizer containing the accumulated excrement of seabirds or bats broadly : excrement especially of seabirds or bats

 

[Evmetro]

Blacks are almost twice as likely to be pulled over as whites — even though whites drive more on average, by the way. We also discovered that blacks are more likely to be searched following a stop. Just by getting in a car, a black driver has about twice the odds of being pulled over, and about four times the odds of being searched. Hispanic drivers, overall, are no more likely than whites to be pulled over, but much more likely to be searched.

In the late-1990s, the concept of “driving while black” began getting national attention. North Carolina became the first state to mandate the collection of traffic stops data in 1999, thanks in large part to efforts by black representatives in the state legislature.

The database includes information on why the driver was pulled over, the outcome of the stop and demographic information about the driver. It also has an anonymous identification number for each officer as well as the time of the stop and the police agency that conducted it.

The initial law focused only on the State Highway Patrol, but it was expanded two years later to cover almost every police agency in the state. As a result, we have a record of virtually every traffic stop in the state since 2002.

AD

The idea was to settle once and for all if “driving while black” was a legitimate grievance. The bill passed with bipartisan support and with the blessing of the leadership of the Highway Patrol. Editorials suggested either it would disprove the ugly allegations of bias, or that police leaders would take immediate steps to resolve any issues the data might reveal. The law also mandated that the state issue periodic reports analyzing the data.


None of this has occurred

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-stops-can-tell-us-about-driving-while-black/

So you don't have even a single name to add to the list that this thread is about. Why post a bunch of stuff if you can't even produce a single name? Is all this propaganda that you posted your way of telling us that you can't produce any names?

 

[Evmetro]

Precisely... Notice how he completely dodged the OP and did not list any names for me?

I often wonder how lefties decide what they are going to post when they decide to evade.

 

[Loving91390]

“Still waiting for names “ ... LOL ! I guess you can’t find any ! Not surprised!

 

[gfm7175]

Lefties are evading this thread like it's the black plague... They have still not provided me with any names... According to Nordberg, it should be super easy to come up with at least a few names...

 

[Evmetro]

Lefties are evading this thread like it's the black plague... They have still not provided me with any names... According to Nordberg, it should be super easy to come up with at least a few names...

This is why I came up with the list that I post in almost every thread that I author. "Dodge, deflect, invert, convert, divert, redefine, or otherwise evade." They will also claim to have already posted whatever the thread is asking about, and they will even claim that names and evidence have been posted multiple times. Naturally, it can never be found. Lefties will also have some reason why they won't lower themselves to posting what you are requesting. There is always a reason.

 

[AProudLefty]

U.S. Army Sergeant First Class Rossano V. Gerald

 

[IBDaMann]

I invite all on this forum to provide me with a list of black victims of cop brutality/abuse for committing simple traffic violations. It should be very easy to do, since cops "regularly do it"...


EDIT:
Current list of names:
[STILL WAITING FOR NAMES] as of 09/17/20 9:15pm CST

The list should be rather easy since it is a proper subset of blacks who were beligerent with cops over a stupid traffic violation.

 

[gfm7175]

U.S. Army Sergeant First Class Rossano V. Gerald

Thank you for this name... It looks like there was a lawsuit that was settled outside of court. Racial profiling charges were dismissed, but illegal search charges were still active. I couldn't find much info on a quick search beyond the dude's testimony and some of the court case info, but I'll add it to the list anyway.

That puts liberals up to one name...

 

[IBDaMann]

U.S. Army Sergeant First Class Rossano V. Gerald

What was the police's account of what happened? I can't find it. I only see one side of the story. We can't go with just that, can we?

 

[gfm7175]

What was the police's account of what happened? I can't find it. I only see one side of the story. We can't go with just that, can we?

I don't think so either, but I feel generous... Maybe I'll add a question mark after the name due to lack of the police's account...

 

[AProudLefty]

What was the police's account of what happened? I can't find it. I only see one side of the story. We can't go with just that, can we?

I'd like to know too. But like gfm said, it has been settled and the racial profiling charges have been dismissed.

What is interesting is that he was stopped TWICE within 30 minutes.

 

[Evmetro]

Thank you for this name... It looks like there was a lawsuit that was settled outside of court. Racial profiling charges were dismissed, but illegal search charges were still active. I couldn't find much info on a quick search beyond the dude's testimony and some of the court case info, but I'll add it to the list anyway.

That puts liberals up to one name...

Not exactly a trend. Even the one name is a pretty weak example.