Little known fact about Geithner

Mottleydude said:
Nice try but it's irrelevent. Ayer is just a bogey man Conservatives are trying to use to scare people with. He's not even remotely relevent.

Limbaugh is relevent. He's the single biggest voice of the Republican party. He has more influence, at the present, at shaping Republican party platforms, policies and their political direction than any other single Republican. Wether you like it or not Limbaugh is the Republican parties leader even though he's an unelected propagandist.

Ayer's, he's just a wingnut bogeyman, you make me laugh even bringing something as lame as Ayer's up in a debate.
Click to expand...

Limbaugh is only as relevant as leftists say he is, which despite lacking logic, seems to be accepted as fact these days...
 
evince said:
Then tweek your discourse Annie.

You cheered and defended the entire time your party was screwing this country.

People mad at CEOs because they raped the country and screwed our economy is not in line with the GOP platform now is it?

Remember all the defending of CEO exorbitant pay, rememeber all the talk about how we lean too hard on industry with regulations, remember all the talk about freeing up the chains on business, remember how great the economy will be when they are deregulated?

Well you guys got what you wanted and called us all manner of names for saying it was a disastor in the making.


YOU WERE WRONG!

The people are not going to buy that crap anymore.

Here you sit complaining that we are calling you names for not accepting any fucking blame.


Why do you persist in beliving what has been so obviously proven wrong?

"What you expected has not happened"


That means you try something different to get the result you want.

Can you ever figure that out?
Click to expand...

"Facts" Desh. Remember it was you claiming facts are so important and some people don't accept facts?

Fact: Bill Clinton, a Democrat, signed that 1999 bill which you claim led to this financial disaster.

Fact: A Republican led Congress and a Republican Presidet, George W. Bush, signed the Sarbenes-Oxley law that put massive new regulations on business.

Guess the "facts" don't really jive with your attempted story line do they?
 
Threedee said:
Limbaugh is only as relevant as leftists say he is, which despite lacking logic, seems to be accepted as fact these days...
Click to expand...

My point. I don't listen to him. So he is as relevant as Ayers, to those who don't listen to him.

However, if Rush is the leader of one party, then Ayers is the leader of the other.
 
Annie said:
My point. I don't listen to him. So he is as relevant as Ayers, to those who don't listen to him.

However, if Rush is the leader of one party, then Ayers is the leader of the other.
Click to expand...
Seems to have an equal amount of validity as the Rush is Leader faction of the left.
 
Annie said:
My point. I don't listen to him. So he is as relevant as Ayers, to those who don't listen to him.

However, if Rush is the leader of one party, then Ayers is the leader of the other.
Click to expand...


That homeless virtuoso fella is the leader of the Democrats? Makes sense.
 
cawacko said:
"Facts" Desh. Remember it was you claiming facts are so important and some people don't accept facts?

Fact: Bill Clinton, a Democrat, signed that 1999 bill which you claim led to this financial disaster.

Fact: A Republican led Congress and a Republican Presidet, George W. Bush, signed the Sarbenes-Oxley law that put massive new regulations on business.

Guess the "facts" don't really jive with your attempted story line do they?
Click to expand...


And you now will claim that Deregulation is part of the dem platform?

Now its the Rs who have been fighting for regulations on industry?

This is the crap you guys just cant seem to see.

Bill clinton is one guy and I have already said hes an asshole for signing it.

Bill clinton was wrong along with Gramm Leach Bliley and everyon who was talked into voting for it.

Its in line with YOUR partys LONG term goals.

You convienced soem dems your ideas would work.

We all got fucked.

So now you blame any dems who joined you instead of your own fucking ideas of what is good for the country?


Great whaqtever it takes for you to rationalized your past stupidity.

NOW lets do what will work, we both agree now right?


Tax the wealthy ar higher rates like say back 15 years ago (economy was fine back then and they didnt kill over and die huh?)

Lets regulate the fuckers and NEVER get talk into deregulating them( they did NOT behave and will not in the future).

Lets stop electing pretend cowboys who you guys say look good in jeans.

Lets not elect people because "they" say they are very religious.

Lets not believe shit Fox news spews because they were the ones constantly saying everything that turned out to be fucking lies.
Regulations are strangling the economy.
Taxes on the wealthy are strangling the economy.
Sadam helped AQ
Sadam had WMDs
Bush is a great president



You see everything you have cheered the last decade has been wrong.

You refuse to accept ANY responsibility for what you backed for years that turned into disastor.

YOU WERE WRONG.

you will never admitt it and that is why your party is so very hated by people like me.
 
Mottleydude said:
Uhhh darling that's Randy Ayer's that's getting the talk show and it's a basketball show.
Click to expand...
M'eh. It's close enough. :dunno:

:D

It makes Bill Ayers the leader of the Democratic Party. You've just got to face it now and suffer, like all the righties and their "leader" Rush.

Seriously, both ideas have about the same validity. It doesn't matter that the dude is famous, he's just not the leader of the party. Whenever the left stops talking about him, he doesn't even make the news. We know you'd love to make people believe that Rush is the "de facto" leader, but the facts just don't pan out.
 
Annie said:
My point. I don't listen to him. So he is as relevant as Ayers, to those who don't listen to him.

However, if Rush is the leader of one party, then Ayers is the leader of the other.
Click to expand...



You are not your party.

the vast majority of the remaining R base listens to and or respects Lush Limpballs.

Your team seems to have a penchant for guys who have had major drug and alcohol problems.
 
evince said:
You are not your party.

the vast majority of the remaining R base listens to and or respects Lush Limpballs.

Your team seems to have a penchant for guys who have had major drug and alcohol problems.
Click to expand...

When your "teams" icon is Ted "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy it doesn't really give you a moral high ground to call out a radio commentator who supports the other "team".
 
evince said:
You are not your party.

the vast majority of the remaining R base listens to and or respects Lush Limpballs.

Your team seems to have a penchant for guys who have had major drug and alcohol problems.
Click to expand...

Right, they are all glued to the radio rather than working, taking care of their kids, etc.
 
cawacko said:
When your "teams" icon is Ted "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy it doesn't really give you a moral high ground to call out a radio commentator who supports the other "team".
Click to expand...

How and when did he become an Icon to me?

Oh I see its jsut a fucking lie form you.


Ted Kenedy has done more for this country over his life than any of your guys have BTW.


Bush
Rush
Beck

all had drinking and drug problems throughout their lives.

How do you explain you guys always finding this type of guy as a hero?
 
evince said:
How and when did he become an Icon to me?

Oh I see its jsut a fucking lie form you.


Ted Kenedy has done more for this country over his life than any of your guys have BTW.


Bush
Rush
Beck

all had drinking and drug problems throughout their lives.

How do you explain you guys always finding this type of guy as a hero?
Click to expand...

Like you I was speaking in generalities. However to speak in your terms Rush is not a hero to make so that makes you a liar. Great, that accomplished a lot.

Again, a drunk who took a life is the great "moral compass" of the Senate vs. a talk show host and the band Beck? I'd be willing to put lots of money that Beck isn't a Republican let alone how did he become some sort of "hero" to Republicans.

You're argument here is so lame and childish Desh. Yes Republicans have had people who have abused drugs and alcohol. Do you believe your political beliefs are somehow better as a result?
 
cawacko said:
Like you I was speaking in generalities. However to speak in your terms Rush is not a hero to make so that makes you a liar. Great, that accomplished a lot.

Again, a drunk who took a life is the great "moral compass" of the Senate vs. a talk show host and the band Beck? I'd be willing to put lots of money that Beck isn't a Republican let alone how did he become some sort of "hero" to Republicans.

You're argument here is so lame and childish Desh. Yes Republicans have had people who have abused drugs and alcohol. Do you believe your political beliefs are somehow better as a result?
Click to expand...


Beck is not a band. Beck is an individual. So is the other one.
 
Dungheap said:
I think it's a reference to Glenn Beck, who is really off the deep end lately.
Click to expand...

Oh. Is he the guy recently signed by Fox News? I've never even heard his show. It would be generous to a fault (or more to the point outright wrong) to claim Beck carrys the same kind of influence as Limbaugh. I've seen lists of the most listened to talk radio hosts and never seen Becks name on there once. (I assume he has a talk radio show?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top