London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

Micawber said:
In the twenty plus pages here, Ive read perhaps 2, If this becomes 200, I'll read 4. It's fucking stupid. I already know what nonsense is coming. I don't care about some VA Tech gobbler hokey fraud engineer in the face of thousands of others who actually examined the site think.
Your "impossibility" physics proclamation carries all the weight of Baghad bob's. There is nothing impossible about what everyone saw with their own two eyes. It ain't even Willy Mays amazing catch impossible. It's fucking obvious, normal and how it had to happen.

Silly. Silly all day long.
Click to expand...

Scroll through this thread and see if you can find me asking you to believe any fucking thing. I don't give a rats ass if you believe this or not.

What everyone saw with their own eyes was controlled demolition .. EXACTLY WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE.

This is an issue that has no right or left, democrat or republican, nor black or white element to it. It's free-thinking people vs lemmings .. and its growing.

STUPID .. all day long.
 
blackascoal said:
Scroll through this thread and see if you can find me asking you to believe any fucking thing. I don't give a rats ass if you believe this or not.

What everyone saw with their own eyes was a controlled demolition .. don't care if you don't believe that.

This is an issue that has no right or left, democrat or republican, nor black or white element to it. It's free-thinking people vs lemmings .. and its growing.

STUPID .. all day long.
Click to expand...

You're lame because all you can say is what didn't happen. Tell us your version of what did happen.

You won't, of course.
 
Interesting the amount of anti-semitism involved in many of these theories including Larry Silversteins supposed involvement. I guess a huge democratic donor such as him was willing to work in cahoots with the Bush Administration to allow this to occur.
 
cawacko said:
Interesting the amount of anti-semitism involved in many of these theories including Larry Silversteins supposed involvement. I guess a huge democratic donor such as him was willing to work in cahoots with the Bush Administration to allow this to occur.
Click to expand...

:0) No one here has even mentioned Silverstein or anything remotely anti-Semitic but YOU.

Interesting indeed.
 
cawacko said:
He was the owner of WT7. Did he know dynamite was supposedly being placed in his building? Or is he a victim?
Click to expand...

I know who Silverstein is, as I'm sure others do .. but NOBODY has even mentioned him but YOU.

Looking for fake anti-Semitism .. look in the mirror.
 
blackascoal said:
I know who Silverstein is, as I'm sure others do .. but NOBODY has even mentioned him but YOU.

Looking for fake anti-Semitism .. look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

That's rawstorys take. I've mentioned nothing of it other than repeating what rawstory stated.

But clearly asking if Silverstein was involved is the no go zone
 
cawacko said:
That's rawstorys take. I've mentioned nothing of it other than repeating what rawstory stated.

But clearly asking if Silverstein was involved is the no go zone
Click to expand...

Rawstory :rofl2:

You mean THIS Rawstory?

9/11 investigator says hijackers had help from US-based Saudis — and classified 28-page report may prove it
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/911...s-and-classified-28-page-report-may-prove-it/

Even if and/or when someone talks about Silverstein, that hardly makes it anti-Semitic.
 
I work in real estate. I've done work for Silverstein. Someone of his knowledge and abilities knows what's happening in his buildings. So he must have been complicit right? (and that has nothing to do with anti-semitism)
 
cawacko said:
I work in real estate. I've done work for Silverstein. Someone of his knowledge and abilities knows what's happening in his buildings. So he must have been complicit right? (and that has nothing to do with anti-semitism)
Click to expand...

You're free to believe whatever you choose to believe brother.
 
Sailor said:
That cannot be argued with.
Click to expand...

Thanks be to God.

Makes be google this:
1001 C.E. Muslim Ghurs begin two century Jihad (Holy War) against Hindus of ...

In 1001, Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni defeated Raja Jayapala of the Hindu ... India (modern Afghanistan and Pakistan) lasted over 175 years, from 1010 to 1187.

Under Sabuktigin, Ghazni found itself in conflict with the Shahi Raja Jayapala. When Sabuktigin died and his son Mahmud ascended the throne in 998,
Ghazni was engaged in the North with the Qarakhanids when the Shahi Raja renewed hostilities.
In the early 11th century, Mahmud of Ghazni launched seventeen expeditions into South Asia.

In 1001, Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni defeated Raja Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Gandhara (in modern Afghanistan),
the Battle of Peshawar and marched further into Peshawar (in modern Pakistan) and, in 1005, made it the center for his forces.

The Ghaznavid conquests were initially directed against the Ismaili Fatimids of Multan, who were engaged in an ongoing struggle
with the Abbasid Caliphate in conjunction with their compatriots of the Fatimid Caliphate in North Africa and the Middle East;

Mahmud apparently hoped to curry the favor of the Abbasids in this fashion. However, once this aim was accomplished,
he moved onto the richness of the loot of wealthy temples and monasteries. By 1027, Mahmud had captured parts of North India
and obtained formal recognition of Ghazni's sovereignty from the Abbassid Caliph, al-Qadir Billah.


Ghaznavid rule in Northwestern India (modern Afghanistan and Pakistan) lasted over 175 years, from 1010 to 1187.
It was during this period that Lahore assumed considerable importance apart from being the second capital, and later the only capital, of the Ghaznavid Empire.

At the end of his reign, Mahmud's empire extended from Kurdistan in the west to Samarkand in the Northeast, and from the Caspian Sea to the Punjab.
Although his raids carried his forces across Northern and Western India, only Punjab came under his permanent rule;
Kashmir, the Doab, Rajasthan, and Gujarat remained under the control of the local Indian dynasties.

In 1030, Mahmud fell gravely ill and died at age 59. As with the invaders of three centuries ago,
Mahmud's armies looted temples in Varanasi, Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, Somnath and Dwarka.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests_of_the_Indian_subcontinent

NOTES:

Mathura = Mathura is a sacred city in Uttar Pradesh, northern India. The deity Lord Krishna is said to have been
born on the site of Sri Krishna Janma Bhoomi, a Hindu temple. Dotting the Yamuna River are 25 ghats (flights of steps down to the water),
of which Vishram Ghat is considered the holiest. Sati Burj is a 16th-century memorial tower.
Dwarkadhish Temple has a carved entrance and a black-marble idol of Lord Krishna.

Dwarka Dwarka is often identified with the Dwarka Kingdom, the ancient kingdom of Krishna,
and is believed to have been the first capital of Gujarat.
The city's Dwarkadhish Temple dedicated to Krishna was originally built around 2,500 years ago,
but was destroyed by Mahmud Begada rulers and subsequently rebuilt in the 16th century.
The temple is also the location of Dwaraka maţha, also called Sharada Matha/Peeth and "western peeth",
one of the four peeths (Sanskrit: "religious center") established by Adi Shankaracharya.

As an important pilgrimage center for Hindus, Dwarka has several notable temples, including Rukmini Devi Temple,
Gomti Ghat, and Bet Dwarka. There is also a lighthouse at the land end point of Dwarka.

Dwarka is believed to have been the first capital of Gujarat.[2] The city's name literally means the "gateway to heaven"
in Sanskrit, as Dwar means "gate" and ka references "Brahma".[3] Dwarka has also been referred to throughout its history
as "Mokshapuri", "Dwarkamati", and "Dwarkavati".[4] It is mentioned in the ancient epic the Mahabharata.[3]

According to legend, Krishna settled here after he defeated and killed his uncle Kansa at Mathura.[5]

This mythological account of Krishna's migration to Dwarka from Mathura is closely associated with the culture of Gujarat.

Dwarka was selected as a heritage city by the Indian government's Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) initiative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarka
 
blackascoal said:
Scroll through this thread and see if you can find me asking you to believe any fucking thing. I don't give a rats ass if you believe this or not.

What everyone saw with their own eyes was controlled demolition .. EXACTLY WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE.

This is an issue that has no right or left, democrat or republican, nor black or white element to it. It's free-thinking people vs lemmings .. and its growing.

STUPID .. all day long.
Click to expand...

No it didn't look like controlled demolition, it looked like ten or so of the upper floors near where the planes hit gave at once en mass and then that mass fell on the 11th, twelfth below them, and so on, for 100 stories. Sorry.
We can't even agree what we saw much less what it meant. We do not share reality. Yours may be real too, but I own the one 99.99999999 percent of people I meet every day in this world believe.

I have not ever heard of anything as absurd as this crap, and that's really not exaggeration. Birthers are not as half as silly as this shit. It's even worse than UFO and sasquatch. That's how dumb this shit is. Tabloids should pass on it.
 
Before 9/11 I would have never believed that a skyscraper could fall straight down like that.

But after seeing it with my own eyes (on TV/video) I now believe it.

Anyone who has ever watched a controlled demolition is familiar with that series of small but audible explosions that occur around the bottom floor as they systematically knock the supports out from underneath it.

Not only did this not happen at the WTC towers, but if they had done a controlled demolition, they would've​ had to do it from the outside of the buildings because the exterior walls are what gave the towers their main support.

A secret controlled demolition on those buildings would have been impossible.
 
Last edited:
blackascoal said:
Let me guess .. for the record .. you don't think this government has killed its own people for nefarious reasons.

Creating false flags for war just doesn't happen in the United States, huh?
Click to expand...
This guy is an ocean going lunatic, no wonder he runs away when confronted with logic and facts.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
blackascoal said:
Answer my questions and I'll answer yours.

Do you believe that this government hasn't killed Americans for nefarious reasons?

Are false flags to war a myth?
Click to expand...

Classic diversionary tactics, he must have played I show you mine if you show me yours when he was a kid!

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top