London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

cawacko said:
I've just made an ass of myself for the last time (on this issue). At lunch I brought this topic up and people looked at me like I was fvcking crazy.

This sh*t is nuts.
Click to expand...
BAC has lost a lot of credibility for his bullshit defense of 9/11 weirdos.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Everyone who denies 9-11 was an inside job is a paid govt shill. No other explanation is possible since everyone knows about bldg 7, the smokiest gun in history.
Click to expand...

AND

Everyone who believes 9-11 was an inside job is a paid idiot. No other explanation is possible since everyone knows that the idiots will believe anything.

:evilnod:
 
What these loonys can't seem to understand is that all three buildings were badly damaged structurally and the girders were severely weakened by heat losing much of their tensile strength.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Milagro said:
What these loonys can't seem to understand is that all three buildings were badly damaged structurally and the girders were severely weakened by heat losing much of their tensile strength.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

Correct, the NIST report concluded that the fires which were largely fueled by the contents of the offices, as opposed to the buildings themselves or the jets, caused the collapse. The report concluded that the jets alone did not cause the collapse and that had the fires not ensued the buildings would have stayed up indefinitely. The jet's however, created giant gaping holes that allowed air to enter that fed oxygen, and of course, the fires were initiated by the giant fireballs from jet fuel on impact. Its continuation was largely fed by furnishing, paper etc. I thought it was interesting that each of the two large buildings burned about the same amount of time before failing. That was not noted, but I saw that. About 10 minutes different from the respective impacts.

What I posted was a mere 300 pages of report. It appears there are thousands of pages comprising the official synthesized report, authored by hundreds of experts. Also of note is that the conclusion is essentially consistent with the conventional wisdom and what any child would conclude that day. Planes, then hours of fire, then collapse cased by planes and fire. The only surprise to me, was as above, the structural damage due to the kinetic impact did not cause the collapse, the fire alone did it, except of course as the jet impact was the proximate cause of the fire.
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
https://www.nist.gov/publications/r...eral-building-and-fire-safety-0?pub_id=101028

Aircraft impact and ensuing fires cause it. Final NIST report. If you aren't an expert STFU. You are not qualified to examine the evidence, and you didn't. Or did thousands of forensic engineers, fire experts and contractors join the conspiracy, fake 4 years of study and co-author a continuing fraud?


Idiocy.
Click to expand...

The idiot is anyone who believes that furniture fires can melt giant buiuldings. :rofl2:

Let me guess .. there was no wood or furniture in the thousands of building fires before 9/11, nor any wood or furniture in all the building fires since 9/11 .. NONE of which melted into collapse. :0)

Absolutely moronic.

They can tell you ANY fucking thing.
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
Correct, the NIST report concluded that the fires which were largely fueled by the contents of the offices, as opposed to the buildings themselves or the jets, caused the collapse. The report concluded that the jets alone did not cause the collapse and that had the fires not ensued the buildings would have stayed up indefinitely. The jet's however, created giant gaping holes that allowed air to enter that fed oxygen, and of course, the fires were initiated by the giant fireballs from jet fuel on impact. Its continuation was largely fed by furnishing, paper etc. I thought it was interesting that each of the two large buildings burned about the same amount of time before failing. That was not noted, but I saw that. About 10 minutes different from the respective impacts.

What I posted was a mere 300 pages of report. It appears there are thousands of pages comprising the official synthesized report, authored by hundreds of experts. Also of note is that the conclusion is essentially consistent with the conventional wisdom and what any child would conclude that day. Planes, then hours of fire, then collapse cased by planes and fire. The only surprise to me, was as above, the structural damage due to the kinetic impact did not cause the collapse, the fire alone did it, except of course as the jet impact was the proximate cause of the fire.
Click to expand...

Hey einstein. NO PLANE HIT TOWER 7!!! You didn't even know that did you??? Please stay off this thread. You're starting to embarrass ME!
 
blackascoal said:
The idiot is anyone who believes that furniture fires can melt giant buiuldings. :rofl2:

Let me guess .. there was no wood or furniture in the thousands of building fires before 9/11, nor any wood or furniture in all the building fires since 9/11 .. NONE of which melted into collapse. :0)
.
Click to expand...

Yup - the Grenfell Tower in london was an apartment but there was no furniture. All the residents were cultists who slept on the floor and ate off the floor.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Yup - the Grenfell Tower in london was an apartment but there was no furniture. All the residents were cultists who slept on the floor and ate off the floor.
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

... and they believe that bullshit.

FURNITURE .. localized and isolated FURNITURE fires .. can melt giant buildings into uniform symmetrical collapse. :0)

ISOLATED FURNITURE FIRES somehow weakened all the widely spaced and heavily reinforced support columns at the exact same moment.

Hey Cawacko .. you asked me about Larry Silverstein .. you mean this one?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top