London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

evince said:
The collapse made the old 7 World Trade Center the first tall building known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires,[7] and the only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed due to fire.
Click to expand...








only one ever
 
Nomad said:
There was only ONE 9/11 style attack on such buildings in the history of the world, too.
Click to expand...

Planes hit buildings all the time.

No steel-frame building has EVER collapsed from ANY fire nor impact.

It's IMPOSSIBLE.

Explain WTC 7 .. small fires, no plane hit the building.

A plane just as large as the planes that hit the Towers, loaded with approx. the same amount of fuel, also supposedly hit the Pentagon .. then disappeared into thin air leaving a relatively small circular hole in the back

Ridiculous
 
blackascoal said:
WRONG .. there is absolutely nothing about the construction of those buildings that would lend them to falling straight down .. which is IMPOSSIBLE., except by controlled demolition.

Are you aware that WTC7 was designed differently that WTC 1, 2 .. yet all 3 fell in the exact same IMPOSSIBLE manner into their own footprints.

You are looking for excuses to fit the mindfuck .. not looking to science for answers.

I don't hate Bush either .. but the 9/11 story is for children and colonized minds.

Why would this government do it .. " America needs "some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" -- Project for a New American Century
Click to expand...

There absolutely is, too.

There is a really good NOVA documentary that explains it quite clearly.
 
evince said:
The collapse made the old 7 World Trade Center the first tall building known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fires,[7] and the only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed due to fire.
Click to expand...

NEVER AGAIN HAPPENED BEFORE OR AFTER
 
Nomad said:
There absolutely is, too.

There is a really good NOVA documentary that explains it quite clearly.
Click to expand...

As I'm sure there is a Popular Mechanics story to back up that silly claim. :0)

Have you ever read the design characteristics of the buildings .. I have.

Riddle me this .. WSC 1 and 2 had completely different designs than WTC 7 .. yet all 3 fell in the exact same IMPOSSIBLE manner..

Buildings topple over .. they do not fall straight to the ground .. nor can they unless imploded.

Think for yourself.
 
Giant planes hit high up in the world trade centers, humongous fires ensued and burned for hours, then the towers collapsed in pancake fashion, each gathering more weight to collapse the floors beneath that had not been compromised. To boot, OBL claimed responsibility for ordering the attack.

Given this scenario, I'm pretty damn sure the towers fell down because of the hijackers. I see no reason why any highrise building burning like a candle for hours might not collapse straight down upon its frame. Except maybe the leaning tower of Pisa. In fact I envision a toppling -tipping over as a bizarre occurrence. Had that happened, I might be more inclined to be on board with trurhers, if anything, Lol.
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
Giant planes hit high up in the world trade centers, humongous fires ensued and burned for hours, then the towers collapsed in pancake fashion, each gathering more weight to collapse the floors beneath that had not been compromised. To boot, OBL claimed responsibility for ordering the attack.

Given this scenario, I'm pretty damn sure the towers fell down because of the hijackers. I see no reason why any highrise building burning like a candle for hours might not collapse straight down upon its frame. Except maybe the leaning tower of Pisa. In fact I envision a toppling -tipping over as a bizarre occurrence. Had that happened, I might be more inclined to be on board with trurhers, if anything, Lol.
Click to expand...

Bin Laden never claimed responsibility for the attack .. AND, the FBI never charged him with anything related to 9/11. If Bin Laden had confessed, he would had been charged with the crime.

If the FBI had ANY evidence that Bin Laden was in ANY way responsible for the attacks, he would have been charged.

You do know the Bin Laden 'confession tapes' were a fraud, right? Why would your government offer up OBVIOUS fake tapes as evidence?

I have a better question .. who told you that Bin Laden was behind the attacks? Bush and Cheney say they never told you that.


If the FBI never told you that .. Bush and Cheney say that it wasn't them .. then who told you? :0)
 
cawacko said:
BAC, did Bush or his administration collude with bin Laden to pull this off?
Click to expand...

I have no idea. Who did it requires a serious investigation that must be lead by science, not politics.

.. and that will never happen.

Any idea how many people we've killed and how much money the MIC has made from our so-called 'war on terror?'

Guess who OUR ground troops were when Obama destroyed Libya?

Answer: AL QUEDA.


Should have listened to Eisenhower.
 
Last edited:
How does something not happening in one instance, prove a truth in another instance? The 2 are completely unrelated.

Just have to use critical thinking.
 
blackascoal said:
Bin Laden never claimed responsibility for the attack .. AND, the FBI never charged him with anything related to 9/11. If Bin Laden had confessed, he would had been charged with the crime.

If the FBI had ANY evidence that Bin Laden was in ANY way responsible for the attacks, he would have been charged.

You do know the Bin Laden 'confession tapes' were a fraud, right? Why would your government offer up OBVIOUS fake tapes as evidence?

I have a better question .. who told you that Bin Laden was behind the attacks? Bush and Cheney say they never told you that.


If the FBI never told you that .. Bush and Cheney say that it wasn't them .. then who told you? :0)
Click to expand...

I can't remember who. I just remember that he confessed. He blamed the US citizens regarding our military killing in the Middle East as the justification. Seems straightforward. The nist report, the planes, the hijackers origins, the confession, the prior bombing in like 1991. It all makes perfect sense. What you say on this, respectfully, makes no sense at all. Frankly it is ridiculous. Nothing else you say is. Just this. I'm totally on board with you otherwise.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
look at all the mass of power that so many americans handed over to the feds with little to no resistance. the TSA, DHS, PATRIOT ACT...........just to name a few. the war on terror, the expanded war on terror. the war on americans......everything is being called terrorism now. we're living in a real life role playing game called paranoia. we're constantly told to 'see something, say something', or we're led to believe that only government can protect us, if we have nothing to fear, nothing to hide. get harassed for carrying a gun in public even though it's a constitutional right, or worse yet......getting harassed and/or arrested for taking pictures of government buildings.
Click to expand...

So the gumbment orchestrated 9/11 so they could pat genitals down at the airport? Great theory. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top