London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
The idea that people are still bringing this up, is hilarious.
We've got "leaks" from the White House, the DNC server was hacked, etc, etc; but this info has been uncovered/
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Just as you've invented yours. Thanks
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Truly extraordinary that such different people can believe the same old tired shit.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Did you know that the bombing of Hiroshima was faked also, seeing as how no such bomb was ever dropped on a city before or after.
Japan faked the destruction, along with Hollywood, so they could find a graceful way out of WWII and gain support for building them into what they are today.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
There wasn't just minor fire damage, that's just bullshit.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Trayvon Martin isn't really dead either.
It was all a plot, devised by the left to keep the racism fires burning in America.
Wilson also conspired with Elvis, to start the entire BLM movement.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Anybody that seriously gives credence to the WTC conspiracy theories is truly ignorant and impervious to reason. Do you really want to be in the same group as Daesh and TDAK?
Last edited:
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
What you saw on 9/11 was smoke, not massive fire .. which is a sign of oxygen deprivation which results in lower temperatures.
The Madrid fire for instance showed the building engulfed in intense flames for much longer than any building on 9/11 without any universal symmetrical collapse.
No building on 9/11 burned like the London fire, yet it did not collapse. WTC 7 has small fires, yet, it collapsed. Obviously fire isn't the difference.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're an idiot, no wonder you think highly of Daesh!What you saw on 9/11 was smoke, not massive fire .. which is a sign of oxygen deprivation which results in lower temperatures.
The Madrid fire for instance showed the building engulfed in intense flames for much longer than any building on 9/11 without any universal symmetrical collapse.
No building on 9/11 burned like the London fire, yet it did not collapse. WTC 7 has small fires, yet, it collapsed. Obviously fire isn't the difference.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I'm not the least bit concerned about swallower theory or who I may be grouped with.
How about you addressing why WTC 7 collapsed. I'd be much more impressed by that.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I most certainly think FAR higher of Desh than some bobblehead posting his twinky emotions instead of addressing OBVIOUS truth .. such as the London and Madrid fires burring far more intensely than anything seen on 9/11.
Can you address that .. or would you rather just talk about Desh?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Pay attention, I posted a video and a Daily Mail article. You might also read this as well.
http://www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/features/the-collapse-of-wt-7/
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
cancel2 2022
Canceled
They were on the lower floors and the fires weakened the structural integrity of the steel girders so much that it collapsed like a house of cards.WTC 7 in a state of collapse .. where are the intense fires?
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
cancel2 2022
Canceled
The tower block in London was constructed from reinforced concrete beams not steel girders.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
cancel2 2022
Canceled
WTC 7 in a state of collapse .. where are the intense fires?
Watch the video and stop being so illogical. The internal floors and beams had already collapsed. The final demise of WT7 was the now unsupported outer walls falling down. If you look at the video closely you will see the penthouse collapsing first followed by the hollowed out shell of WT7.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Last edited:
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Not interested in your every post. Simply state why WTC 7 collapsed.
NIST claimed it was bought down solely by fire .. which would make it the first steel-frame high-rise building in the known universe to be brought down solely by fire. Of course they later retracted that claim.
NIST said: “Fuel oil fires did not play a role in the collapse of WTC 7.”
With regard to the second element of falling debris binging down the building, NIST said: “Other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 [the North Tower] had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7.
Maybe the 'terrorists' used magic :0) because fire didn't bring that building down.
I ask again .. look at the building as it was going down .. WHERE OH WHERE ARE THE RAGING FIRES?
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You are totally impervious to reason and rationality so I bid you good day. I've come to the conclusion that there isn't a conspiracy theory around that you won't sign up to, no doubt you believed the Apollo landings were all faked as well.
Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo