Looks like another school shooting.....

Nomad said:
So then what was the point of your butt boy bringing up the question of whether or not the school was a gun free zone?

And why did you get involved in the topic if not to imply that it had something to do with the girl being able to shoot two people?

There must be some reason, or maybe you're just both a couple of dumbass trolls with nothing better to do.
Click to expand...

Maybe you forgot telling the whole forum that there is no law in Wisconsin making private schools gun free zones.
 
gfm7175 said:
Yes, that's precisely what NoNads thinks. Apparently being a private school somehow puts it above the rule of law.

@JPP's Libtards --- The above is a prime example of how to "do your own research".

When NoNads says something incredibly stupid about "gun free zones", its very easy to pull up the relevant state statutes regarding Wisconsin schools being "gun free zones".
Click to expand...

He seems to have forgotten that he said that, doesn't he?
 
gfm7175 said:
When NoNads says something incredibly stupid about "gun free zones", its very easy to pull up the relevant state statutes regarding Wisconsin schools being "gun free zones".
Click to expand...
Never forget the second part of the problem, i.e. compulsory attendance in those defenselessness zones. I don't think it would be as big a deal if there were merely defenselessness zones created for those who crave such and our children weren't required to shoehorn into them and be sitting targets like a dunk tank; however, Wisconsin children, 6 to 18 years of age, must provide 875 hours of potential target practice annually in a selected defenselessness zone.

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 118, specifically Section 118.15 (Compulsory School Attendance) and Section 118.16 (School Attendance Enforcement) are what compel Wisconsin children to file obediently into their assigned target positions. When children are truants from defenselessness zones, the children are punished; however if Wisconsin parents try to protect their children by homeschooling them and cheating the current system of cannon fodder resources, the State can go after the parents with hefty fines and prison terms ... after concocting some 2nd-tier justice excuse.
 
gfm7175 said:
Yes, that's precisely what NoNads thinks. Apparently being a private school somehow puts it above the rule of law.

@JPP's Libtards --- The above is a prime example of how to "do your own research".

When NoNads says something incredibly stupid about "gun free zones", its very easy to pull up the relevant state statutes regarding Wisconsin schools being "gun free zones".
Click to expand...
Totally irrelevant.

The fact that the school is a gun free zone had nothing to do with the incident.

Or maybe you can prove that it did

Maybe you can prove that if every teacher in the school was packing a loaded handgun, that 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people.

Go ahead.... prove it.

Or shut your ignorant fucking yap.
IBDaMann said:
Show me one human who doesn't obey instructions (e.g. to drop his weapon) from the guy pointing a firearm at him. Show me one human who continues to kill children after he has been shot dead by the guy pointing a firearm at him.
Click to expand...
Prove that the 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people before someone with a gun could have gotten their gun and confronted her.

Prove it or shut your ignorant redneck shithole mouth.

Oh wait, you just proved it with that limp-wristed pansy-ass response.
Diogenes said:
Maybe you forgot telling the whole forum that there is no law in Wisconsin making private schools gun free zones.
Click to expand...
Maybe you can try to keep the argument relevant rather than changing the subject, loser.
 
Nomad said:
Totally irrelevant.

The fact that the school is a gun free zone had nothing to do with the incident.

Or maybe you can prove that it did

Maybe you can prove that if every teacher in the school was packing a loaded handgun, that 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people.

Go ahead.... prove it.

Or shut your ignorant fucking yap.

Prove that the 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people before someone with a gun could have gotten their gun and confronted her.

Prove it or shut your ignorant redneck shithole mouth.

Oh wait, you just proved it with that limp-wristed pansy-ass response.

Maybe you can try to keep the argument relevant rather than changing the subject, loser.
Click to expand...

You said a private school wasn't a gun free zone. Right?
 
Nomad said:
Totally irrelevant.
Click to expand...
It's everything. It's why you have no argument.

Nomad said:
The fact that the school is a gun free zone had nothing to do with the incident.
Click to expand...
The fact that the school is a defenselessness zone had everything to do with why there were no armed personnel preventing the incident from ever happening.

Nomad said:
Maybe you can prove that if every teacher in the school was packing a loaded handgun
Click to expand...
Too funny! Nomad thinks that teachers are the only adults in a school.

@Nomad, it doesn't have to be teachers. Why do you think that there are no other adults at the school? Why can't law enforcement station someone in each school? .,. or allow schools to post armed personnel?

Oh, that's right, because it's a defenselessness zone.

Nomad said:
that 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people.
Click to expand...
Nope. It's your job to argue that the girl would have gotten off the shots even if her firearms had been previously confiscated and even if she had been dropped dead by armed personnel.

I hope you realize that you haven't even come close to convincing any rational adult of your stupid argument.

Nomad said:
Or shut your ignorant fucking yap.
Click to expand...
Or shut your ignorant fucking yap.

Nomad said:
Prove that the 15 year old girl could not have gotten off the shots that killed two people before someone with a gun could have gotten their gun and confronted her.
Click to expand...
Nope. Yours is to prove that armed personnel could not have rendered a different result, or shut your ignorant fucking yap.

Nomad said:
Prove it or shut your ignorant redneck shithole mouth.
Click to expand...
Prove it or shut your ignorant redneck shithole mouth.
 
Diogenes said:
Does Anchovies think kids that can't tie their own shoes yet can choose their gender?
Click to expand...
Kids do not choose gender? Perhaps you did, but it is a problem for very very few kids. It is not some random unspecified belief, but one found deep in their being. They know from a young age they do not fit and are different. Nowadays they have haters like you, who do not know them, making their lives more miserable. That must make you feel good.
 
Nordberg said:
Kids do not choose gender? Perhaps you did, but it is a problem for very very few kids. It is not some random unspecified belief, but one found deep in their being. They know from a young age they do not fit and are different. Nowadays they have haters like you, who do not know them, making their lives more miserable. That must make you feel good.
Click to expand...

Your opinion is noted, and will be accorded the consideration it merits.

Say, didn't you claim John McCain voted for the ACA?
 
IBDaMann said:
It's everything. It's why you have no argument.


The fact that the school is a defenselessness zone had everything to do with why there were no armed personnel preventing the incident from ever happening.


Too funny! Nomad thinks that teachers are the only adults in a school.

@Nomad, it doesn't have to be teachers. Why do you think that there are no other adults at the school? Why can't law enforcement station someone in each school? .,. or allow schools to post armed personnel?

Oh, that's right, because it's a defenselessness zone.


Nope. It's your job to argue that the girl would have gotten off the shots even if her firearms had been previously confiscated and even if she had been dropped dead by armed personnel.

I hope you realize that you haven't even come close to convincing any rational adult of your stupid argument.


Or shut your ignorant fucking yap.


Nope. Yours is to prove that armed personnel could not have rendered a different result, or shut your ignorant fucking yap.


Prove it or shut your ignorant redneck shithole mouth.
Click to expand...
I see you still haven't posted any study or statistics or anything else that might even slightly support your idiotic, simple-minded contention that adults with guns on school campuses, no matter what their position, would significantly or even slightly reduce the risk of a shooter being able to get off a number of shots before any adult could get to their gun, then get to where the shooter was and neutralize them.

As long as you cannot do that, you lose and I win.

But I guess as stupid as you are about everything else, you're probably also stupid enough to assume these people would be carrying their guns around with them everywhere in a holster, ready to draw like some old TV western cowboy.

You truly are an ignorant, simplistic rube.

I hope you are thankful that I'm so generous that I lower myself to directly engage with a zero like you.
 
Nomad said:
I see you still haven't posted any study or statistics or anything else that might even slightly support your idiotic, simple-minded contention that adults with guns on school campuses, no matter what their position, would significantly or even slightly reduce the risk of a shooter being able to get off a number of shots before any adult could get to their gun, then get to where the shooter was and neutralize them. As long as you cannot do that, you lose and I win. But I guess as stupid as you are about everything else, you're probably also stupid enough to assume these people would be carrying their guns around with them everywhere in a holster, ready to draw like some old TV western cowboy. You truly are an ignorant, simplistic rube. I hope you are thankful that I'm so generous that I lower myself to directly engage with a zero like you.
Click to expand...


Didn't you tell the whole forum that there is no law in Wisconsin making private schools gun free zones?

ANSWER!
 
Dogshit said:
Nomad must've forgotten telling the whole forum that there is no law in Wisconsin making private schools gun free zones.
Click to expand...

Dogshit must've given up on the challenge I made for him or any of his ignorant barrel stroker butt buddies to find a published study which says guns in schools make them safer.

Because as of yet, none of you drooling apes has posted on word of such a study.

Losers.
 
Nomad said:
Dogshit must've given up on the challenge I made for him or any of his ignorant barrel stroker butt buddies to find a published study which says guns in schools make them safer. Because as of yet, none of you drooling apes has posted on word of such a study. Losers.
Click to expand...


Didn't you tell the whole forum that there is no law in Wisconsin making private schools gun free zones?

ANSWER!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top