Low IQ on display

[RB 60]

Duh. The scientific method.

What would you think of someone who lied about their results? You and I both know that it's not the brag, it's the results.

If a person claims their method of loading, choice of powder and bullets is superior, isn't it the scientific way to say, "Okay. Let's see it."?

Why shouldn't I ask you if some people think science is evil?

You make no sense.

 

[Matt Dillon]

I don't own a locomotive, but when it comes to brakes, I've discovered that the best way to maintain them is to use your own hands only to write checks or swipe a card.

Spoken like a true Nancy boy.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You make no sense.

I think you are being less than forthcoming, RB. You know your method of testing rifles, ammunition loads over certain distances is a scientific process. The same scientific process used by NASA.

 

[RB 60]

I think you are being less than forthcoming, RB. You know your method of testing rifles, ammunition loads over certain distances is a scientific process. The same scientific process used by NASA.

NASA processes has nothing to do with ranging and accurizing a rifle. What works best in a Remmington generally doesn't work as well in a Winchester or Sako. There are so many variables (caliber, twist rate, barrel length, action) that absolutes can only be obtained through trial and error with one certain rifle. Anyone who spends time on a rifle range knows this.

 

[Walt]

Over the years, our resident right wing wonks and MAGA mooks have claimed amateur "expertise" in the following fields: weaponry, international politics, auto mechanics, military tactics, history, sociology, religion, linguistics, etc. They do this when they either cannot produce valid documented source material from real experts to support their contentions. It gets to the point when they indirectly profess to know MORE than valid experts, much less people who may have invented/created the topic/product of discussion. After a point, trying to rationally and factually debate them is like banging your head against the wall ... it feels so good when you stop.

It is amazing that they claim to be able to solve all problems, and yet actually solve no problems.

 

[IBDaMann]

It is amazing that they claim to be able to solve all problems, and yet actually solve no problems.

You just described leftists, the vast majority of whom are stupid and undereducated ... and completely dishonest ... and only regurgitating what they have been ordered to believe by someone else who does their thinking for them.

All leftists insist they are JPP's science gurus whenever the topic of Global Warming, Climate Change or greenhouse effect emerges. Of course, every single one is a scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept moron who must have slept through high school. The only retort they have is to tell others who know so much more than they do "You obviously know nothing about science."

Leftists are utter morons.

So, in the spirit of the thread title, I declare myself JPP's science expert and I declare all leftists unfit to lick my sandals. Your WACKY religion has been debunked and you are in desperate need to get back to school.

Of course, you can always prove me to be mistaken by posting some actual science (no links) directly into the thread that was made specifically for it: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-the-Global-Warming-Faith-Claim-to-be-Science

Yep, all you leftists are morons who don't even know what science is. I'm looking forward to your continued insistence that you are geniuses who know that Global Warming is thettled thienth!

Don't tarry!

 

[IBDaMann]

I think you are being less than forthcoming, RB. You know your method of testing rifles, ammunition loads over certain distances is a scientific process. The same scientific process used by NASA.

Terry, you're still being stupid, I see. Just for laughs, in what capacity specifically do you believe NASA uses the scientific method? I think the orderly is about to have his way with you again.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Terry, you're still being stupid, I see. Just for laughs, in what capacity specifically do you believe NASA uses the scientific method? I think the orderly is about to have his way with you again.

I know you can't help yourself, Sybil. Mental illness is not a joke. The fact you truly believe Into the Night and gfm7175 are different people fascinates me.

 

[Walt]

You just described leftists, the vast majority of whom are stupid and undereducated ... and completely dishonest ... and only regurgitating what they have been ordered to believe by someone else who does their thinking for them.

And yet I am the one telling you that most problems are complex, and difficult to solve. They will require a huge amount of work, and studying to even partly solve. We can write brief references to the solutions in these posts, but the real solutions do not lend themselves to short posts.

And you are the one saying you can solve all the problems of the world with short, simple solutions. You claim the only reason all the people who have studied these problems disagree with you, is that they are all lying.

All leftists insist they are JPP's science gurus whenever the topic of Global Warming, Climate Change or greenhouse effect emerges. Of course, every single one is a scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept moron who must have slept through high school. The only retort they have is to tell others who know so much more than they do "You obviously know nothing about science."

So you are claiming to be such an amazing expert on every subject imaginable that you can immediately realize that every time we quote an expert, it is completely wrong? That is an amazing amount of expertise.

Do you have any idea how long it takes to become an expert in even one field? You would have to have studied for thousands of years to be able to pass judgement on so many fields.

I declare myself JPP's science expert

What is your educational background in all sciences that makes you an expert?

 

[Walt]

Terry, you're still being stupid, I see. Just for laughs, in what capacity specifically do you believe NASA uses the scientific method? I think the orderly is about to have his way with you again.

NASA mostly uses engineering to develop tools that explore science. The 18,000 employees of NASA publish huge numbers of peer reviewed papers that use the scientific method. Hundreds of thousands of other scientists work with NASA to publish even more peer reviewed papers that use the scientific method.

So we can believe all these scientists, or we can believe "IBDaMann." How many people have you landed on the moon, "IBDaMann"? How many PHD's do you have, "IBDaMann"?

 

[IBDaMann]

And yet I am the one telling you that most problems are complex, and difficult to solve.

... and that is incorrect. Most problems are simple and effectively self-imposed.

They will require a huge amount of work,

They are easy to solve.

We can write brief references to the solutions in these posts, but the real solutions do not lend themselves to short posts.

I can see the difficulty confronted by the dim-witted. For rational adults who do not allow others to do their thinking for them, most problems are trivial to solve.

And you are the one saying you can solve all the problems of the world with short, simple solutions.

Let's talk about what you just did right here. This is standard page-6 of the leftist playbook. "When you are getting your ass handed to you, think of an entirely absurd, bogus position, assign it to your opponent and then attack him for having that absurd, bogus position that he doesn't actually have."

Of course, you force my hand. You require me to insist that you provide a quote from me stating that I can solve all the problems of the world with short, simple solutions.

You claim the only reason all the people who have studied these problems disagree with you, is that they are all lying.

Now there are two quotes that you owe me.

So you are claiming to be such an amazing expert on every subject imaginable

Three quotes.

I'm standing by.

What is your educational background in all sciences that makes you an expert?

Background is irrelevant. All that matters is that I know what I know, and science is what I know, as well as math and logic and economics. It's the knowledge that makes me an expert. I'm ready to discuss any science that you might have that you wish to discuss.

... but you don't have any, do you?

 

[IBDaMann]

NASA mostly uses engineering to develop tools that explore science.

This gibberish requires additional clarification. Include an explanation of what you mean by "explore science."

The 18,000 employees of NASA publish huge numbers of peer reviewed papers that use the scientific method.

Just for laughs, how do you imagine that a paper uses the scientific method?

Hundreds of thousands of other scientists work with NASA to publish even more peer reviewed papers that use the scientific method.

Same question.

So we can believe all these scientists,

What do you mean by "believe them" and why are you calling them "scientists"?

or we can believe "IBDaMann."

Who is this "we"? Oh, that's right, by "we" you mean "you" because you are multiple people ... countless people in fact. I totally get it.

How many people have you landed on the moon, "IBDaMann"?

Not onto the moon, but I contributed to my one-person extent to get two space shuttles and two Delta rockets into orbit. I really would have done more but I'm not countless people like you are.

How many PHD's do you have, "IBDaMann"?

I'm not giving you any personal information, and it wouldn't be appropriate. This is an anonymous forum. I see that you don't understand how that works.

The bottom line is that credentials don't matter here. What you post needs to stand on its own ... like science and math and logic. So pop on over to the Why Does the Global Warming Faith Claim to be Science? thread and post the science you insist you have that supports your debunked and discredited religious faith.

 

[Walt]

They are easy to solve.

Then why haven't you solved them? If you could have easily solved them, and obviously did not, you are a horrible failure.

Background is irrelevant. All that matters is that I know what I know, and science is what I know, as well as math and logic and economics. It's the knowledge that makes me an expert. I'm ready to discuss any science that you might have that you wish to discuss.

You refuse to tell us how you know enough to be an expert in all fields?

 

[Lightbringer]

Are we under attack?' Trump Jr. loses it over train derailments

Donald Trump Jr. on Friday suggested that the United States might be under attack because of recent train derailments in Ohio and Michigan.

"Are we under attack?" Trump Jr. posted on Twitter. "Does anyone believe you can have all of these major train derailments, all with severe environmental consequences, and it’s just total coincidence?"

Trump Jr. has also claimed that the Biden administration is ignoring the derailments because it has impacted predominantly white communities.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...A17CQoY?cvid=30433a6f6b8648bea9f3b6d4fef107bd

The tranny bullshit is the attack and you know that, right jew?