Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.

[SmarterthanYou]

So no point. You just like hearing yourself. Got it.

I see you still can't admit when you're wrong.

 

[Truth Detector]

I see you still can't admit when you're wrong.

I see you still don't have a point.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

yep.

that's Sean hannity.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

and i have loved Sean for years, from the neal boortz Atlanta days where I heard him locally before Fox news.

always awesome.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I said that the SENATE can approve or veto any treaty that the President proposes to them.

yes.

I believe this is the constitutional position.

this other law that "gave Congress power then gave it back" is just unconstitutiional.

I guess really the Senate could pull the ultimate globalist trade treachery if they wanted.

 

[Into the Night]

The Constitutional Convention in 1787 specifically rejected granting the Federal govt. the right to use military force against a state. Such a clause was proposed by Charles Pickney of South Carolina, who ironically was also responsible for ensuring the protection of slavery by threatening the state's rejection of the Constitution. He was opposed to string stats' right, the exact opposite of later southern views.

Irrelevant, since South Carolina was not a State of the Union at the time. Rights do not come from a piece of paper. State's rights are inherent.

No matter what nation a State belongs to, no matter how oppressive the overlying government is, every State has the right to defend itself, just as every individual has the right to defend themselves. That does not come from the 2nd amendment or any other part of any constitution.

The federal government of the United States was never given any authority to ban or limit any weapon. The 2nd amendment also makes that specifically apply to the States.