Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
There you going believing you can read my mind.
You can relieve the pain you put on this country by performing a retroactive abortion on yourself.
Where did I claim to read your mind?
There you going believing you can read my mind.
You can relieve the pain you put on this country by performing a retroactive abortion on yourself.
Back to thread. Masks work and this is why you want to wear one. https://gizmodo.com/horrifying-images-show-how-the-coronavirus-ravages-our-1844946904 It is a very dangerous disease.
You don't make actual claims. You just post rants and wacky opinions.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Yup. I give permission for the mods to "disclose" my "socks" because there is nothing to disclose to begin with. I have no socks and never will either.Excellent. Thanks.
Agreed.I hope you agree with me that people who seeks to deceive others with sock puppets are lowly, weak-minded people.
Virtually. I came across ITN on a different forum numerous years ago, and I came across IBD on a yet different forum (a few years after?) virtually meeting ITN. I've corresponded with ITN quite a bit longer than I have with IBD. They aren't socks either.Since you and I are on the subject, can you please explain the very close, almost incestuous, relationship with INT/IBDa? He's most certainly a sock since he's screwed up and given himself away several times. Do you know him/them personally or just virtually?
Yup. I give permission for the mods to "disclose" my "socks" because there is nothing to disclose to begin with. I have no socks and never will either.
Agreed.
Virtually. I came across ITN on a different forum numerous years ago, and I came across IBD on a yet different forum (a few years after?) virtually meeting ITN. I've corresponded with ITN quite a bit longer than I have with IBD. They aren't socks either.
How can you be so certain if you've never personally met them?
I can't prove it in any way, but they express their ideas differently... For example, ITN defines science as "a set of falsifiable theories" while IBD defines science as "falsifiable models that predict nature". They are both correct, but they have just chosen to express their position differently.
CFM long ago proved himself to be a dickhead. He never posts anything worth reading, which is why he was one of the first on my ignore list.She wasn't talking about all Trump supporters, dumbass.
That would make me a wigger according to you.
Evmetro, as always, is totally delusional. The fact that the article was "published" by a conspiracy theory website instead of a professional journal says more about the article than any disputation could. Why try to tear apart something so flimsy that it couldn't pass muster by a legitimate publication?If no lefty can copy n paste a quote here from the article that this thread is about with an explanation of why he disputes it, then the article is strong. By not being able to quote ANYTHING from the article to dispute, lefties agree with the article by default.
Did you just admit that you can't prove what you're saying?So you can't prove what you 're saying? As I always say you pig fuckers aren't worth pissing on
Masks work. It has been proven both by scientific experiments and statistical analysis.
No lefty has been able to post ANY disputes from the article that this thread is about. This is a picture worth a thousand words, thanks for endorsing the article.
You play that same game all the time. You have been presented with lots of scientific facts showing masks work. Just like Trump's racism has been thoroughly documented by posters. You simply deny it and say it did not happen. Your dishonesty is noted.
Obviously a bot. Just keeps posting the same thing over and over.No lefty has been able to post ANY disputes from the article that this thread is about. This is a picture worth a thousand words, thanks for endorsing the article.
There's no need. The article is obvious trash. If there was anything to it, they wouldn't have had to go to a conspiracy theory website to get it published.You can post all you want on this thread, but you absolutely CANNOT post a quote of something that you dispute from the article that this thread is about. Your next post will be dodge, deflect, divert, invert, convert, redefine, or otherwise evade posting a quote from the article of something you dispute from it.
The science is conclusive, here is the article:
https://www.sott.net/article/434796...rators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses
Lots of science, check it out. For those who want to claim the article is flawed, be sure to copy n paste the error here where we can see it.