Mass deportations will fulfill the law; and the will of the majority

Hawkeye10 said:
Neither UniParty nor the courts will allow it.
Click to expand...
Well maybe the right-tribe leadership has finally figured out you can just ignore the courts and nothing happens to you.

Like how multiple states have been repeatedly ignoring the supreme court decisions on the 2nd amendment.

"Whats that? I can't hear you? Stay the deportation? Whoops we just deported him."


There is no mechanism for enforcement. No punishments for ignoring courts, especially courts ordering you to stop enforcing the law.
 
christiefan915 said:

It's complicated.​

How ‘poll-washing’ lends Trump false legitimacy​

Too often, polls are treated as “revealing” popular support for something the survey-takers don’t fully understand.​

"Trump and his allies have described their intentions toward immigrants in openly fascist terms. Trump has said that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country” and that “getting them out will be a bloody story.” He has promised to use the military to round up millions of immigrants — including people here legally — into mass detention camps and deport them, causing unthinkable social and economic chaos. Yet for months, we’ve seen headlines claiming that most Americans, including a substantial portion or even a majority of Latinos, support mass deportations.

These headlines are the result of what I call “poll-washing” — using surveys to “reveal” popular support for something the survey-takers don’t fully understand. There is abundant evidence, often in the same surveys, that people support the abstract idea of “mass deportation,” yet oppose the particulars of what Trump’s planned mass deportation would actually entail. But we don’t hear anything about this contradiction. And that silence risks lending Trump’s plans false legitimacy.
For instance, 54% of voters in a September Scripps/Ipsos poll said they support “the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants.” but a much larger share (68%) said they support a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers, who would face deportation under Trump’s plans. In an October New York Times/Siena poll, 45% of Hispanic voters said they support “Deporting immigrants living in the United States illegally back to their home countries” — yet 67% said they support “Providing a pathway to citizenship for all undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States."

www.msnbc.com

Opinion | How ‘poll-washing’ lends Trump false legitimacy

Too often, polls are treated as “revealing” popular support for something the survey-takers don’t fully understand.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com
Click to expand...
and nobody ever poll washed about anything else... like say abortion, healthcare, social security, brexit, or "banning books".
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Well maybe the right-tribe leadership has finally figured out you can just ignore the courts and nothing happens to you.

Like how multiple states have been repeatedly ignoring the supreme court decisions on the 2nd amendment.

"Whats that? I can't hear you? Stay the deportation? Whoops we just deported him."


There is no mechanism for enforcement. No punishments for ignoring courts, especially courts ordering you to stop enforcing the law.
Click to expand...
Hello Civil War.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Hello Civil War.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they would say "just because we do it doesn't mean you can", but that doesn't mean they have the guts to go against the federal government.

IMO if they were willing they would start with attempted secession, to which I would respond "don't threaten me with a good time."

Much as those women have responded to the imaginary threat to early term abortion with "well then we won't have sex", deep blue cities attempting to secede is basically what 'we' wanted the whole time.

What is secession but de-federalization?

We don't want their tax money, we don't want them to use the federal government to steal from and regulate us. That's all. They'll starve without our food, so how about this: free trade.

What does the constitution say? That's right regulate interstate commerce, and the remaining right-tribe dominated country would regulate commerce with the seceded city-states.

Let's add another brilliant idea: mutual defense pact

There we go we've recreated the original union of states and cut out the bullshit collectivist fascism creep. They can bring in their hordes of immigrants (legally) and see where that gets them. Most will leave after these cities collapse into anarchy just like central American countries do all the time when they can't defeat the communists or the cartels.

The rabid anti-crime anti-communist survivors of those collapses will then ask to be let back into the United States of America.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I'm sure they would say "just because we do it doesn't mean you can", but that doesn't mean they have the guts to go against the federal government.

IMO if they were willing they would start with attempted secession, to which I would respond "don't threaten me with a good time."

Much as those women have responded to the imaginary threat to early term abortion with "well then we won't have sex", deep blue cities attempting to secede is basically what 'we' wanted the whole time.

What is secession but de-federalization?

We don't want their tax money, we don't want them to use the federal government to steal from and regulate us. That's all. They'll starve without our food, so how about this: free trade.

What does the constitution say? That's right regulate interstate commerce, and the remaining right-tribe dominated country would regulate commerce with the seceded city-states.

Let's add another brilliant idea: mutual defense pact

There we go we've recreated the original union of states and cut out the bullshit collectivist fascism creep. They can bring in their hordes of immigrants (legally) and see where that gets them. Most will leave after these cities collapse into anarchy just like central American countries do all the time when they can't defeat the communists or the cartels.

The rabid anti-crime anti-communist survivors of those collapses will then ask to be let back into the United States of America.
Click to expand...
I need to get to Movie Time With Slut so I am not going to process this post, I am just going to say this:

The Overlords are not going to let one election stop them, Hell, I am not even sure that Harris losing was hubris and incompetence though it likely was, they the Shadow government might be fine with Trump in the chair as America and our Empire collapse.

Drink the best wines today, there may be no tomorrow, the Overlords are driving hard for WW3.
 
The Trump Administration said:
They can even have gang tats, as long as they enter the US legally.

BTW, in law, the asylee process differs from the refugee procedure.

Refugees meet the definition of a refugee; i.e. someone of special humanitarian concern to the United States.

Refugees are generally people outside of their country who are unable or unwilling to return home because they fear serious harm.

Refugees must seek a referral for refugee status from outside of the United States; for example at a US Consulate or US Embassy. They will be interviewed abroad by a United States Citizenship and Immigration (USCIS) officer who will determine whether the applicant is eligible for refugee resettlement in our country.

Asylum is a form of protection available to people who:
  • Meet the definition of refugee, but
  • Are already in the United States
  • Are seeking admission through a designated port of entry

www.uscis.gov

Refugees and Asylum | USCIS

Refugee status or asylum may be granted to people who have been persecuted or fear they will be persecuted on account of race, religion, nationality, and/or membership in a particular social group
www.uscis.gov
Click to expand...

Regardless,, there are some who would make much better citizens than many of the brats born here, and those that hate third country should be replaced by them ASAP. If Democrats beleived the bullshit they spread, they should be more than happy to be replaced.
 
Read all the innuendo about Musk's work visa. The fact that he is white and from South AFrica alone makes him an eligible refugee fleeing a shithole full of homicidal racist blacks. A non-starter issue in no way comparable to what scumbag Democrats are doing to this country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top