Massive hypocrite Gore...

Bush does a good job with his house. With the country - not so much.

I think if you're going to lead on this issue, you kind of have to walk the walk. Bush doesn't lead on this issue, so what he does personally doesn't matter a whole lot to me.

oh, and the point about Bush is that he really isn't a vocal leader on the issue and Gore supposedly is. Yet Bush has had his property "green" for many years while our supposed leader is just now getting around to it.
 
Is the boar really leading? or simply telling spooky stories based on his warped sense of what is occuring based on faulty models? Models which he in turn exaggerates?

He's leading. Gore has elevated the topic as a priority in a way that is hard to fully measure, but I have no doubt that without his efforts, the awareness & discussion of it would be on a much lower level.
 
oh, and the point about Bush is that he really isn't a vocal leader on the issue and Gore supposedly is. Yet Bush has had his property "green" for many years while our supposed leader is just now getting around to it.

Gore bought the property in 2002, and has been renovating since.

Bush has not lead at all on a national level on any issue related to the environment.
 
Is the boar really leading? or simply telling spooky stories based on his warped sense of what is occuring based on faulty models? Models which he in turn exaggerates?

Is the boar really leading?

Uh, yes. He got a Nobel Prize for leading. And leaders, scientists, and policy makers from around the world recognize him for it. At his Nobel Acceptance speech the audience went crazy for him. The world loves Gore. Sorry, it must hurt you. :)
 
Gore bought the property in 2002, and has been renovating since.

Bush has not lead at all on a national level on any issue related to the environment.

It does not take five years to update a property.

I agreed that Bush is not a leader on the issue... yet his home is indeed Green.
 
He's leading. Gore has elevated the topic as a priority in a way that is hard to fully measure, but I have no doubt that without his efforts, the awareness & discussion of it would be on a much lower level.

I agree he has helped in the sense that he has brought the topic to the front. But I think he has also hurt the cause by exagerating to the point of people tuning out the issue because of the exaggerations.
 
I agree he has helped in the sense that he has brought the topic to the front. But I think he has also hurt the cause by exagerating to the point of people tuning out the issue because of the exaggerations.


The only people who get hung up on perceived exaggerations are Rush Limbaugh, Mike Savage, Sean Hannity & all of the people who adore them.
 
That's nice, but I'm always on the move. I have computers near me nearly every place I go too. You think it's a dumb idea?

no not a dumb Idea, I am jut not sure how well it will work out.
The cell capacity has to be lower because of less space with the flip lid and connector and circuitry all in the standard sized cell.

I got a battery charger that will work in my car or on 110V.
 
I agree he has helped in the sense that he has brought the topic to the front. But I think he has also hurt the cause by exagerating to the point of people tuning out the issue because of the exaggerations.

He hasn't hurt the cause. Surely you jest. Your Gore-hatred is overwhelming you. Was the movie perfect? No. Is the movie, and Gore's efforts, broadly, and nearly universally recognized around the world as a valuabe contribution? Not a doubt.

This is the free market of ideas. You cons believe in competition and free markets right? That the people with the best ideas/products should win? Well, Gore has won. The only people who are dismissing him, are a few million americans in wingnutotopia and the con media. The rest of the world loves him, and embraces his efforts on global warming. He won, in the "free market". Deal with it.
 
The only people who get hung up on perceived exaggerations are Rush Limbaugh, Mike Savage, Sean Hannity & all of the people who adore them.

Bullshit. I listen to none of the above and I do not like the fact that the boar resorts to fear mongering to try and promote his agenda. That is simply a pathetic attempt by you. Seriously, trying to associate the right wing nuts with everyone that thinks his exaggerations are pathetic is pathetic in itself.

When the IPCC and the SCIENTISTS say you are exaggerating, then what good are you doing to continue with your idiotic exaggerations? ALL you can accomplish is making people think the whole issue is a crock of shit. You do NO GOOD by exaggerating the issue.

Also... the exaggerations are not perceived. Or do you think 20 feet is simply a "perceived" exaggeration???
 
Umm people smarter than at least most of us gave Gore a big award....

tell me... how are they "smarter" than us???? I agree that the scientists are smarter than me on the issue, but the presenters of the award? I think not. After all, they gave the Nobel PEACE prize to someone who has done what exactly to promote PEACE? Running around like chicken little doesn't promote peace. I think it is a huge leap of logic to assume the actual scientists from the IPCC should have won the PEACE prize, let alone chicken little.
 
Bullshit. I listen to none of the above and I do not like the fact that the boar resorts to fear mongering to try and promote his agenda. That is simply a pathetic attempt by you. Seriously, trying to associate the right wing nuts with everyone that thinks his exaggerations are pathetic is pathetic in itself.

When the IPCC and the SCIENTISTS say you are exaggerating, then what good are you doing to continue with your idiotic exaggerations? ALL you can accomplish is making people think the whole issue is a crock of shit. You do NO GOOD by exaggerating the issue.

Also... the exaggerations are not perceived. Or do you think 20 feet is simply a "perceived" exaggeration???

In the movie I saw, most of what have been targeted as "exaggerations" are presented as "worst case scenarios" by Gore. I can see, with your built-in hatred of him, how you would misinterpret that.

Also, if you choose to allow what you (again) perceive as an exaggeration by someone you hate to cloud objective reasoning on the issue and cause you to dismiss it as a priority as a result, I can't really help you. To me, that's just plain stupid.
 
tell me... how are they "smarter" than us???? I agree that the scientists are smarter than me on the issue, but the presenters of the award? I think not. After all, they gave the Nobel PEACE prize to someone who has done what exactly to promote PEACE? Running around like chicken little doesn't promote peace. I think it is a huge leap of logic to assume the actual scientists from the IPCC should have won the PEACE prize, let alone chicken little.

Who picked the winners ? The presenters ? Or the Scientists and such ?
 
In the movie I saw, most of what have been targeted as "exaggerations" are presented as "worst case scenarios" by Gore. I can see, with your built-in hatred of him, how you would misinterpret that.

Also, if you choose to allow what you (again) perceive as an exaggeration by someone you hate to cloud objective reasoning on the issue and cause you to dismiss it as a priority as a result, I can't really help you. To me, that's just plain stupid.

the Republicans have their own edited version of the movie.
 
In the movie I saw, most of what have been targeted as "exaggerations" are presented as "worst case scenarios" by Gore. I can see, with your built-in hatred of him, how you would misinterpret that.

Also, if you choose to allow what you (again) perceive as an exaggeration by someone you hate to cloud objective reasoning on the issue and cause you to dismiss it as a priority as a result, I can't really help you. To me, that's just plain stupid.

Another pathetic cop out on your part. To presume that I "hate" Gore and use that as justification for your strawman. The point is that in the IPCC's and the REAL SCIENTISTS opinion, his "worst case" scenarios are not possible.

It is quite obvious that on this issue your head is up Gores ass and thus you must enjoy the shit he pumps out. Because again, if you look at the IPCC.... THEY are saying that Gore is exaggerating, because none of their models or scientists think that chicken little's "worst case" scenarios are possible.

But please, continue with your strawmen. Try to project hatred of Gore on to me. That is obviously your only defense.
 
There was an article that was widely reported on the other day (and posted in the other forum on JPP) where they were speculating a potential 22' rise in sea levels, in a worst case scenario:

http://news.aol.com/story/_a/acceler...11220409990001

So Gore was actually kind of low-balling it.

And don't deny that you hate Gore. Your contempt for him is well-documented on this board, though it would be hard to search because you always use a derogatory name for him.
 
There was an article that was widely reported on the other day (and posted in the other forum on JPP) where they were speculating a potential 22' rise in sea levels, in a worst case scenario:

http://news.aol.com/story/_a/acceler...11220409990001

So Gore was actually kind of low-balling it.

And don't deny that you hate Gore. Your contempt for him is well-documented on this board, though it would be hard to search because you always use a derogatory name for him.

the 20 foot rise is predicted in the worst case scenario to take place over 1000 years plus. Gore "inconveniently" forgets to mention that part.

Gore acts like the Gulf Stream will shut down... the IPCC says that is highly unlikely.

Your lovefest for chicken little shows that you are obviously not going to be objective. Bush exaggerates... you call it a lie. Chicken little does it and you say, thats ok al we still worship you.
 
Back
Top