Media ignores this Hurricane. Just white victims; oh well.

How many ignorant Mayors will these coastal
Citys hire couldn't get 2.4 million people to
Evacuate & didn't try another fool . If he was white ?? More New Orleans . storm headed to Louisiana just more...

Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk

Not sure your point but I do recall seeing a guy in Texas who said they didn't evacuate because of the high risk of tornadoes combined with clogged roadways, so they would rather ride out the hurricane than risk being on a highway when a twister came through.
 
LOL - another keen insight into the deluded world of a Trump supporter.

I'm sure you guys see the Obama years as a string of headlines stating "Obama saves the day!!!" As cawacko said, the headlines & stories I have seen have been mainly about the heroic efforts to save people and rescue them.

You're really far gone. I've seen stories about the federal assistance & about Trump visiting there tomorrow, but the ratings are going to come from the rescue stories. Sorry - that's how most news decisions are made. You wouldn't be satisfied until you saw a "Forget those silly hero stories...Trump is awesome!!!"

I knew you couldn't come up with a positive headline lol.
 
I knew you couldn't come up with a positive headline lol.

Will you PLEASE stop doubling down on your idiocy? This thread - which you supported - has already been thoroughly debunked and ridiculed by pretty much everyone on JPP, left & right. And you have shown - w/ this & your Libya/Code Pink stuff - that you see all media coverage through a prism which is narrow, partisan and deluded.

So, why again do I have to go traipsing off whenever you beckon, to find headlines for you? This storm has gotten massive coverage. You & Irish look like partisan fools.
 
So I double checked to be sure. From 2:04 pm to 2:07 pm Est, CNN, FNC and MSNBC were reporting about Harvey, Houston and TX. MSNBC is currently interviewing Ted Cruz.
 
Considering this is still ongoing with more rain/floods coming what headlines are you hoping/expecting to see?

Basically, my point is the media hasn't found anything with the storm to beat Trump over the head with. I don't have an issue with the general coverage, per se, and I didn't sign onto the OP's white angle.

But so far, Trump's response has been more than adequate. He has good FEMA people in place and was Johnny on the Spot with the release of federal disaster funds.

I would think that would be worth AT LEAST ONE positive headline out of the MSM.

I also pointed out that the only government failure has been on the local level, where the mayor failed to call for an evacuation of Houston. It's amazing no one has died as a result.

I haven't seen a single headline about that in the national media. Of course, the mayor is a democrat, so yeah.
 
Not sure your point but I do recall seeing a guy in Texas who said they didn't evacuate because of the high risk of tornadoes combined with clogged roadways, so they would rather ride out the hurricane than risk being on a highway when a twister came through.

o rilly?


houston-mayor.jpg




houston-flood-1.jpg
 
Not sure your point but I do recall seeing a guy in Texas who said they didn't evacuate because of the high risk of tornadoes combined with clogged roadways, so they would rather ride out the hurricane than risk being on a highway when a twister came through.
Just more talk people who loose it all will act differently
& take some personal responsibility if they have a problem again some one says I'am in flood zone I'am going for high ground . MORE LAME EXCUCES TAKE RESPONSABILITY
IS ALL BADDD.

Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk
 
What a dumb comment. There were over 1800 fatalities in Katrina vs. five in Harvey, to this point. Of course Katrina got more coverage.

wasnt harvey billed as the worst storm evar for texas?

Since we are coming with a death toll of 5 vs 1800 does this mean it was handled well?
 
Just more talk people who loose it all will act differently
& take some personal responsibility if they have a problem again some one says I'am in flood zone I'am going for high ground . MORE LAME EXCUCES TAKE RESPONSABILITY
IS ALL BADDD.

Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk

Are you sober?
 
Basically, my point is the media hasn't found anything with the storm to beat Trump over the head with. I don't have an issue with the general coverage, per se, and I didn't sign onto the OP's white angle.

But so far, Trump's response has been more than adequate. He has good FEMA people in place and was Johnny on the Spot with the release of federal disaster funds.

I would think that would be worth AT LEAST ONE positive headline out of the MSM.

I also pointed out that the only government failure has been on the local level, where the mayor failed to call for an evacuation of Houston. It's amazing no one has died as a result.

I haven't seen a single headline about that in the national media. Of course, the mayor is a democrat, so yeah.

A paragraph from a Journal editorial:


The government—federal, state and local—seemed to be responding well under the conditions, at least to the extent one can tell from afar. The blame-shifting between state and federal officials that sometimes attends disasters wasn’t apparent. Officials were rightly focusing first on search and rescue for those threatened by floodwaters, but in the days ahead the attention will focus on clean up and rebuilding. Red Cross and private companies are also doing what they can and will be doing more as people need food and temporary shelter.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/disaster-and-the-wealth-of-nations-1503872977



I guess i'm not seeing that this would make headlines considering it's still a fluid situation with lives on the line
 
wasnt harvey billed as the worst storm evar for texas?

Since we are coming with a death toll of 5 vs 1800 does this mean it was handled well?

I think it's safe to call it the worst rain event. The amount of rain Houston is getting is insane and it's not even over. They may get 2-3 more days of it.
 
Proof that I saw someone on TV saying the reason they chose not to evacuate was congestion and tornadoes is in a time machine somewhere. I didn't mention anything about whoever the hell you are rambling on about.

so you cant prove what u claimed happened actually did

i accept yer admission
 
A paragraph from a Journal editorial:


The government—federal, state and local—seemed to be responding well under the conditions, at least to the extent one can tell from afar. The blame-shifting between state and federal officials that sometimes attends disasters wasn’t apparent. Officials were rightly focusing first on search and rescue for those threatened by floodwaters, but in the days ahead the attention will focus on clean up and rebuilding. Red Cross and private companies are also doing what they can and will be doing more as people need food and temporary shelter.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/disaster-and-the-wealth-of-nations-1503872977

I guess I'm not seeing that this would make headlines considering it's still a fluid situation with lives on the line.

I won't disagree with the last part.

Maybe it's just weird not hearing 'because....Trump', from the media after the last 9 months lol.

And since the only thing they could say [at this point at least] would be positive, they say nothing about him.
 
itz silly 2 say the fake newz iz ignoring harvey

they r not

they just make sure 2 stick plenty of trump bashing commentz in their coverage :rofl2:
 
Back
Top