Megyn Kelly blasts 'overweight, out-of-shape' women battling LA fires amid public outcry

For real. I love a fat bitch bitching into the anonymous internet about American heroes being "obese lesbians" while she does not one single thing to make a single thing in the world better. The self misery in that thing is off the chart.
I think her point was, stop with the DEI agenda and resume merit hiring.
 
Megyn Kelly was right, obviously. Why would the LA fire department need an overweight dike as a "diversity chief"? What does diversity have to do with fighting fires? Why do they have a diversity chief at all? How much money do they pay this ugly bulldyke?
Oh. You're an old, fat, straight, white man. Allow me to educate you. (It won't work.)

Minorities have been subjugated, disenfranchised, abused, and murdered in the US since the day it was formed. After 248 years, it turns out that the racist piles of trash who insist on continuing to do that will not give up their unearned privilege without it being snatched from their fingers.

So here we are. Civil rights. DEI. We take our rights through appropriate channels because you fucking Nazis are terrified of sharing them.
 
It's truly shameful that this is allowed to be the case.

Megyn Kelly blames DEI-obsessed fire department leaders for sending ‘obese’ lesbians to LA fires: ‘We want a strong man to rescue us’ Megyn Kelly slams LA fire chief, calls her “an obese lesbian.

Megyn Kelly angrily accused the “overweight, out-of-shape women” running the Los Angeles Fire Department of being so obsessed with diversity that they’re sending “obese” lesbians to rescue people trapped by the deadly wildfires.

The conservative firebrand used her podcast Monday to claim the response to the historically destructive wildfires was hindered by the department prioritizing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) — saying it is one place she’d actually support transgender women replacing biological ones.

“I believe I speak for all females in Los Angeles when I say, we want a strong man to rescue us,” Kelly said bluntly. “That’s what we want. Do we ask for too much?”

My gosh, that kind of speech should be banned, damn the Constitution. I'm tired of it; no one should be allowed to 'fat shame' or even suggest that a woman might be less able to carry a hefty person down a ladder than a man. Just because standards have been adjusted for 'mis-gendered' folks doesn't mean it's misguided or wrong. We're all supposed to be equal in every conceivable way, and anything less should be illegal. I, for one, was trapped on the third floor of a burning building and just barely made it out alive. I didn't complain at all when the female firefighter couldn't rescue me and had to call for a strong man to get me down the ladder in the nick of time. If I had died, I would've been totally cool with that.

Wait, what the hell am I saying? Something must've hijacked my keyboard because the next thing I knew, that pile of nonsense was staring back at me. It's like some people are incapable of using logic and reason to address the gravity and reality of the debate. (It's sad we even need to have one.)

I have no issues at all if a transgender, female, male, combo, or someone identifying as a goat becomes a firefighter. The only sensible requirement that acknowledges the critical nature of the job where someone's skills and abilities can mean the difference between life and death or massive property damage is that the high physical and mental standards are the same for everyone. PERIOD.

These essential roles that a free and prosperous society has deemed important by the majority, for the benefit of all, have no room for social experiments or DEI initiatives. The same applies to all law enforcement, military, and rescue services. The madness is over, time to get with the program - common sense is making a comeback. Libtards are going to struggle if they can't reintroduce logic into their lives.
 
HELLO ASSHOLE there are a lot of important jobs they can be doing while the real fire fighters ARE out fighting the fire.
Point is GET THE FIRES OUT first then deal with this problem.
Why don't you want the fires OUT?
so you can have something to cry about?
Exactly. They want the firefighting force reduced. During death, destruction, and devastation. MAGA is actually sadistic.
 
Oh. You're an old, fat, straight, white man. Allow me to educate you. (It won't work.)
No, I'm an older (early 60's), slightly overweight (10 lbs), Hispanic man, married for 35 years. So, not even close, lol.
Minorities have been subjugated, disenfranchised, abused, and murdered in the US since the day it was formed. After 248 years, it turns out that the racist piles of trash who insist on continuing to do that will not give up their unearned privilege without it being snatched from their fingers.
Nobody is more racist than the Democrat Party.
So here we are. Civil rights. DEI. We take our rights through appropriate channels because you fucking Nazis are terrified of sharing them.
DEI has nothing to do with civil rights. It's discrimination based on race, and seeks equal outcomes, not equality. It's going by the wayside, as it should. Get used to it. You and your ilk are the Jew hating Nazis, literally.
 
No, I'm an older (early 60's), slightly overweight (10 lbs), Hispanic man, married for 35 years. So, not even close, lol.

Nobody is more racist than the Democrat Party.

DEI has nothing to do with civil rights. It's discrimination based on race, and seeks equal outcomes, not equality. It's going by the wayside, as it should. Get used to it. You and your ilk are the Jew hating Nazis, literally.
Ah, then I missed the mark, my apologies. I'm still getting used to minorities adopting the speak of the white racist.

Democrats bad. Blah blah. You realize that you vote for people who want to strip you of your rights, don't you? If you're an American citizen and straight and vote Republican, then you're ok. For now.

DEI and civil rights are indeed two different things. That's why I separated them with a period, you fucking idiot. DEI is about correcting the damage that straight, white, Christian men - and their confused, white-washed sympathizers - have done to the rest of society.
 
Christie, who I've know for over 20 years by the way, wants to make it about Megyn Kelly. I want to concentrate on the obese and unfit firefighters, which that report is talking about, and not the desk jockeys. So sorry to turn your attempted gotcha into a damp squib.
Indeed
 
Ah, then I missed the mark, my apologies. I'm still getting used to minorities adopting the speak of the white racist.
Again, nobody is more racist than Democrats, white, minority, or otherwise.
Democrats bad. Blah blah. You realize that you vote for people who want to strip you of your rights, don't you? If you're an American citizen and straight and vote Republican, then you're ok. For now.
What rights do Republicans want to strip me of? Be specific and detailed.
DEI and civil rights are indeed two different things. That's why I separated them with a period, you fucking idiot. DEI is about correcting the damage that straight, white, Christian men - and their confused, white-washed sympathizers - have done to the rest of society.
It's Trump might say, what a nasty woman.
 
Again, nobody is more racist than Democrats, white, minority, or otherwise.

What rights do Republicans want to strip me of? Be specific and detailed.

It's Trump might say, what a nasty woman.
Meh, Democrats are not the most racist people in the world, but I'm not one, so your line doesn't really land with me. In fact, partisans bore me to goddamn tears.

Oh, you can vote for them so long as you're useful to them. If you look like a Latino, however, be prepared to be frisked and threatened with deportation. We'll see if he can get that far in 4 years.

Who's a nasty woman?
 
Back
Top