ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
That's just returning to basics, Owl. It started out that very way, right?
It certainly did.
That's just returning to basics, Owl. It started out that very way, right?
Even without it, Whitmer is going to win. The (R)s aren't even putting out any pro-Dixon advertising,
they must not be advertising in the UP because there aren't any voters......there are plenty of ads down here in civilization.....as for pro-Gretch ads all I have seen is one where she is crowing she is pro-education because she let the kids go back to school this year.....
oh, and bragging she got us through covid without raising taxes (which the R legislature blocked her from doing)....lol.......
A 5-2 majority of the Michigan Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a pro-choice amendment seeking to enshrine abortion rights in the Michigan constitution would appear on this November’s ballot, despite a challenge from anti-abortion activists that focused on the spacing between the printed words of the proposed amendment.
Michigan law requires only that ballot proposals be formatted in eight-point type, the court’s majority ruled — “regardless of the existence or extent of the spacing.”
“In this case, the meaning of the words has not changed by the alleged insufficient spacing between them,” the majority opinion added.
The abortion decision was a reversal from that of the Board of State Canvassers, where two Republicans refused to certify the proposed ballot measure based on the word-spacing challenge, deadlocking with the panel’s two Democrats and briefly dooming the pro-choice effort.
In one of two concurrences included in the decision, Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack noted that a record number of Michiganders had signed petitions supporting the proposal, and that challengers hadn’t managed to find anyone who was confused by the word spacing on the amendment language.
whats the nature of the suspicious spacing?
a way to dupe voters?
that sounds right.
If you wanna kill babies why would you have a problem deceiving voters?
Does anyone besides 15 year old hoes care?A 5-2 majority of the Michigan Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a pro-choice amendment seeking to enshrine abortion rights in the Michigan constitution would appear on this November’s ballot, despite a challenge from anti-abortion activists that focused on the spacing between the printed words of the proposed amendment.
Michigan law requires only that ballot proposals be formatted in eight-point type, the court’s majority ruled — “regardless of the existence or extent of the spacing.”
“In this case, the meaning of the words has not changed by the alleged insufficient spacing between them,” the majority opinion added.
The abortion decision was a reversal from that of the Board of State Canvassers, where two Republicans refused to certify the proposed ballot measure based on the word-spacing challenge, deadlocking with the panel’s two Democrats and briefly dooming the pro-choice effort.
In one of two concurrences included in the decision, Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack noted that a record number of Michiganders had signed petitions supporting the proposal, and that challengers hadn’t managed to find anyone who was confused by the word spacing on the amendment language.
Terrible excuse. Try harder.
Does anyone besides 15 year old hoes care?
there has apparently been a spacing based objection.
Good luck. Yer gonna need it.Democrats care, as this will make a much larger turnout at the polls. So good for us.
Good luck. Yer gonna need it.
She is going to be re elected, because you have shit candidates nationwide.
don't be silly......if she gets reelected it will be because the shit voters outnumber the rest of us........
I guess the shits will win!! such on it.
I guess the shits will win!! such on it.
like they did in 2020?.....
You cannot win an election with a large turnout. So you try everything and anything to keep people from voting.
we won in 2016 with a large turnout.....
A 5-2 majority of the Michigan Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a pro-choice amendment seeking to enshrine abortion rights in the Michigan constitution would appear on this November’s ballot, despite a challenge from anti-abortion activists that focused on the spacing between the printed words of the proposed amendment.
Michigan law requires only that ballot proposals be formatted in eight-point type, the court’s majority ruled — “regardless of the existence or extent of the spacing.”
“In this case, the meaning of the words has not changed by the alleged insufficient spacing between them,” the majority opinion added.
The abortion decision was a reversal from that of the Board of State Canvassers, where two Republicans refused to certify the proposed ballot measure based on the word-spacing challenge, deadlocking with the panel’s two Democrats and briefly dooming the pro-choice effort.
In one of two concurrences included in the decision, Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack noted that a record number of Michiganders had signed petitions supporting the proposal, and that challengers hadn’t managed to find anyone who was confused by the word spacing on the amendment language.
That was not a large turnout, see 2020!