Military TERRORIST Plot

[CanceledB]

look, i get that you hate the 2nd Amendment and that you hate guns and rights. you probably hate freedom also, at least for everyone but liberals, but the bottom line is that the framers created this country with the belief that we the people would maintain control and power in this country. hopefully peacefully, but if it failed, that we would then be able to use force of arms to maintain our power over the government. The framers also realized that these rights had the potential to be abused, but that cost was worth it. you may consider then that 2nd Amendment absolutists are 'nuts', but we are in line with the founders of this nation, so consider where that puts you at....on the wrong side.

Yes, you nutters always think it's 'worth it'. Noted.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yes, you nutters always think it's 'worth it'. Noted.

and it's also noted that you disagree with freedom. just so we understand each other.

 

[CanceledB]

and it's also noted that you disagree with freedom. just so we understand each other.

Yeah, I just hate freedom! That's it.

 

[Althea]

You tell me, Oath-man. I wouldn't call this group of nutjobs 'well-regulated', but I bet you do, don't you?

Of course they're regulated.

They regulate the truth to fit their agenda.

My favorite part of the article:


"Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield does not have a gang or militia problem," Larson said in a prepared statement, though he said Army investigators still have an open investigation in the case.

 

[CanceledB]

Of course they're regulated.

They regulate the truth to fit their agenda.

My favorite part of the article:


"Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield does not have a gang or militia problem," Larson said in a prepared statement, though he said Army investigators still have an open investigation in the case.

I'm sure, in their warped, gun-happy perception, they don't see a problem at all.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

why does bijou disrespect the constitution?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Of course they're regulated.

They regulate the truth to fit their agenda.

My favorite part of the article:


"Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield does not have a gang or militia problem," Larson said in a prepared statement, though he said Army investigators still have an open investigation in the case.

one group does not a problem make

 

[zappasguitar]

yes, they were. you keep trying to ignore the FACT that 'well regulated' in the constitution means WELL TRAINED AND FUNCTIONING. not government run. stop re-interpreting the constitution. it makes you look like an idiot.

You can cite some kind of definition that proves "regulated" means what you claim it means, right?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Neither will you...

try to keep up. I did answer the questions. please don't start looking like that idiot moron howey.

 

[zappasguitar]

try to keep up. I did answer the questions. please don't start looking like that idiot moron howey.

I know...sorry. I got ahead of myself, tried to delete the post but wasn't fast enough.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You can cite some kind of definition that proves "regulated" means what you claim it means, right?

reg·u·late

verb (used with object), reg·u·lat·ed, reg·u·lat·ing.
1. to control or direct by a rule, principle, method, etc.
2. to adjust to some standard or requirement, as amount, degree, etc.
3. to adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation
4. to put in good order

do you also need a history lesson from the founding fathers? or do you prefer to remain an ignorant panty pisser that is scared of guns?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I know...sorry. I got ahead of myself, tried to delete the post but wasn't fast enough.

no worries. it happens

 

[Rune]

Well, what do we have here? It's a plot hatched by a militia know as F.E.A.R., for 'Forever Enduring Always Ready'. Charming.

Who wants to be the first to defend their gun rights? LOL

Military Terror Plot: Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot By 'Militia' Within U.S. Military

~snip~

What does this have to do with gun rights?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

What does this have to do with gun rights?

she has avoided this question in two separate threads....wonder if she will answer your question.

don't hold out hope though.

 

[CanceledB]

What does this have to do with gun rights?

Everything. Ask STY, he'll clue you in.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Everything. Ask STY, he'll clue you in.

i knew she wouldn't explain it....coward

 

[CanceledB]

i knew she wouldn't explain it....coward

They're a well-regulated militia, according to STY. Just ask him.

 

[Rune]

Everything. Ask STY, he'll clue you in.

I don't speak his language and he has never been willing to take the time to clue me in.

 

[CanceledB]

I don't speak his language and he has never been willing to take the time to clue me in.

F.E.A.R. (Forever Enduring Always Ready) is a militia, so of course they're sacrosanct just based on that alone, in Oath-Man's world, but they're also 'well-regulated', as per the 2nd Amendment gun right requirements. BTW, 'regulated' has nothing to do with the law, but everything to do with whatever the militia has agreed upon as standards.

 

[Rune]

F.E.A.R. (Forever Enduring Always Ready) is a militia, so of course they're sacrosanct just based on that alone, in Oath-Man's world, but they're also 'well-regulated', as per the 2nd Amendment gun right requirements. BTW, 'regulated' has nothing to do with the law, but everything to do with whatever the militia has agreed upon as standards.

OK but still not seeing the issue.

1. Even if there was no 2nd, the active military members would have access to weapons.
2. No laws or change in any laws would have prevented these criminals from their misdeeds.
3. They could/would have killed their victems with or without guns.

What is your point?
If this thread is just about burning Smarter than Few, disregard this post and carry on.