Minimum wage rate and labors’ market prices.

The Min. wage was supposed to be a living wage when it was started. In 1933 after the act was passed FDR said "any business which depends for its business existence on paying less than a living wage to its workers has no right to continue in this country" One of the reasons many look down on people is because they are paid so badly. They are doing your work, pay them..
Every year min wage workers take a pay cut due to inflation. 15 bucks an hr would not keep up with the Min wage from the 1960s.
 
Capitalism isn't broken. It's brought more people out of poverty than any other system that's ever existed. The system isn't broken because you failed within it just like a car isn't broken if you dumbass fails to put gas in the tank.

Where I live, we don't have curbside trash collection. If I choose, I can pay a capitalist based private company or continue to do what I've done and carry it to work and put it in the dumpster.

Why would you do that? You know your boss has to pay for it.
 
Wages are set due to one thing and only one thing: How easy are you to replace?

Notice I didn't say anything about skill because it doesn't matter.
 
Wages are set due to one thing and only one thing: How easy are you to replace?

Notice I didn't say anything about skill because it doesn't matter.

Depends on the job. There are some jobs where the person doing it is easily replaceable because the skills required to do the job are those which most people can do without any training. Then, there are jobs where you have to be skilled to do it or it doesn't get done properly.
 
The Min. wage was supposed to be a living wage when it was started. In 1933 after the act was passed FDR said "any business which depends for its business existence on paying less than a living wage to its workers has no right to continue in this country" One of the reasons many look down on people is because they are paid so badly. They are doing your work, pay them..
Every year min wage workers take a pay cut due to inflation. 15 bucks an hr would not keep up with the Min wage from the 1960s.

Someone offering $5/hours skills getting paid at least the $7/25/hour national minimum isn't being paid badly. They're being badly overpaid.
 
ok, pollyanna. they wouldn't doooooo that. corporations are pure.


https://truedollarjournal.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-labor-shortage-myth-is-propaganda.html

Exposing the Labor Shortage Fallacy

Under free markets capitalism, there never is a labor shortage. There is only an unwillingness to shift resources to their most demanded uses because of political interference.

In an efficient economy under capitalism, would-be producers will compete for all resources (through bidding) so as to put those resources to the best, highest uses.

There are no labor shortages. There are many would-be producers who lack the buying power to bid high enough to secure enough of extant labor. How they desire to produce is inefficient. Since they can not sell at prices high enough to overcome their inefficiency, society, that is, everyone involved in voluntary exchange, have deemed what they offer to produce as undesirable.

Under capitalism, when producers can not get enough labor, they must hit upon a mechanized means (tool capital) to leverage the labor they have to get their labor to be more efficient. That is the whole point of capitalism!

Labor is merely another kind of capital to an enterpriser. Under free markets, free enterprise competitive capitalism, investors are forced to surrender shares of profits until they can secure enough labor as capital for their undertakings. Under true competition, there are very few rich and those who are rich are not much richer than those who are not.

Claiming there is a labor shortage is a fallacy, an error of thought owing to not understanding reality.

Capitalism Death Whorl

Increasing labor reduces capitalism and leads to the Capitalism Death Whorl. Those who argue for more immies argue against their own livelihoods.


Wages come from the return to capital.
Wages set all other prices.
Increasing the working-age population faster than the return to capital rate makes true wages fall (not current dollar wages).
When real wages fall, true prices fall (not current dollar prices).
When real prices fall, the true returns to capital fall.
When the true returns to capital fall, future capital investment falls.
When future capital investment falls, future returns will be lower and thus future wages will be lower.
In order to maintain profits by maintaining productivity, firms must increase the working-age population.
And with that, we return to Step 3.
Most Economists (PhD Academicians) and Politicians Simply Do Not Understand How Capitalism Works
Without capitalism, there can be no wages (e.g., much of Africa). Where there is high cap spend per capita, there are high wages (e.g., Norway). Where there is low per cap capital spend, there are low wages (e.g., China, India).

For more of my works on this important subject, check out:

UNFETTERED IMMIGRATION IS KILLING AMERICAN CAPITALISM
CURTAILING IMMIGRATION MAKES CAPITALISM WORK. ECONOMIC ILLITERATES VERSUS PRESIDENT TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION REFORM PLAN. - TRUE DOLLAR JOURNAL
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. WHY IT'S BAD FOR YOU AND A BOON FOR ANTI-CAPITALISTS.
CONFUSED BILL CLINTON SAYS AMERICANS NEED IMMIGRANTS. NORWEGIANS VS AMERICANS.
NAFTA? CANADIANS SHOULD PAY A 15.5% TARIFF FOR EXPORTS INTO THE USA. THE WORLD SHOULD PAY MUCH MORE.

Where did I say they were pure?
 
Of course. Now where is the evidence for that which isn't coming just out of your head. I'm not saying you're wrong I want to see an independent source.

AHZ equates the possibility of something with it automatically happening.
 
if you're not refuting the possibility of it. im not doing your busy work.

You make an assertion you're asked to show evidence for your assertion then you get pissy about it. That's fine I will just give your opinion it's due consideration. Thanks
 
AHZ equates the possibility of something with it automatically happening.

Exactly then starts whining like a little bitch when asked to show a source for his assertion. I guess we are just suppose to believe it because he said it.
 
Exactly then starts whining like a birltch when asked to show a source for his assertion. I guess we are just suppose to niece it because he said it.

He's one of those that says something then uses BISSO as his source.
 
You make an assertion you're asked to show evidence for your assertion then you get pissy about it. That's fine I will just give your opinion it's due consideration. Thanks

I assert you believe in the moral purity of corporations. and ive seen no evidence to the contrary.
 
I assert you believe in the moral purity of corporations. and ive seen no evidence to the contrary.

How so if I agreed they could manipulate the market? You don't make any fucking sense butbi am suppose to engage in a conversation with you? You're fucked in the head.

Let me tell you how it works. I assert that a black man is more likely to be killed by another black man than a cop. Then as evidence I redirect you to the FBI website and specifically homicide stats for 2018. There you read that in that year 2965 blacks were killed and 2600 were killed by another black. That's how this fucking works you dimwitted fuck.
 
Back
Top