I also used sarcasm in my answer. I thought it was a funny remark.Was sarcasm Damo, not aimed at you. AHZ is "barking up the wrong tree" at you. I think he just likes to bark.
I also used sarcasm in my answer. I thought it was a funny remark.Was sarcasm Damo, not aimed at you. AHZ is "barking up the wrong tree" at you. I think he just likes to bark.
Clearly... I mean, people in South America used them to symbolize the necessity of human sacrifice! Therefore all eggs used in any context other than breakfast mean that!
"Valid" is not really an issue, it is a symbol. They are what you teach them to mean.It's as equally silly to assert that only the most recently applied meanings are valid.
"Valid" is not really an issue, it is a symbol. They are what you teach them to mean.
You are the one getting bent out of shape. Your assertion that the previously assigned meaning is what counts is what is simply wrong. Earlier you even agreed that the meaning is what is currently taught. Yet you still insist that the importance lies in some meaning that is not assigned to the symbol. It is ridiculous. Yet you insist on continuing an argument you already acceded.SO why are you getting all bent out of shape over the pagan meaning being mentioned? WTF is wrong with you?
So, either read the original post, which clearly mentions the Pagan symbolism and then move on from there without false assertions that I somehow am upset that Pagan is mentioned. Clearly you are inept at reading comprehension if you cannot read the word "Pagan" in the original post.
The misconception is made clear in the original post.But what is the titular "misconception"?
The misconception is made clear in the original post.
That the symbolism of the holiday is more than the constantly assigned Pagan ritual, that there was a reason the egg was included even before the adoption of that clear Pagan symbolism circa 329 AD.
Once again, that there is only Pagan symbolism in the use of eggs in the holiday.No. that was your point. What was the MISCONCEPTION?
Once again, that there is only Pagan symbolism in the use of eggs in the holiday.
Why are you being so deliberately disingenuous?
The thread wasn't about you. The thread is about the misconception that the only reason eggs take part in Easter is because of inclusion of Pagan ritual on or about 329 AD. Only you seem to think the thread is about you.But who said that there was "only" pagan meaning? I admitted the new religions have a "cover story" meaning to hide their luciferian intent.
The thread wasn't about you. The thread is about the misconception that the only reason eggs take part in Easter is because of inclusion of Pagan ritual on or about 329 AD. Only you seem to think the thread is about you.
I have heard Pastors give sermons on this erroneous information, they too do not know the original symbolic meaning of the egg or why it was included in the holiday even before that inclusion.
So, I gave information, so that in the future when a child asks a parent, "Why do we have eggs on Easter?" they might be able to give a more educated answer than a silly story of a bunny.
I seek to dispel a common misconception. That is all.
However, as I stated before, the usage denotes an entirely different origin for that particular symbolism than Paganism.This thing is: your "inclusion before the inclusion" blather only makes sense to you. The egg has been around PRIOR to judaism and christianity, and religions don't develop in a vcauum. ergoooooo....
That is part of the inclusion into the religion of Pagan symbols. The rabbit along with the egg were both fertility symbols.Fair enough Damo I can accept that the egg was a part of passover, and appreciate the correction to my mistake about Easter eggs.
What about the easter bunny ?
Yes, however I also stated that in 329 AD they added some Pagan ritual in order to bring more of the Pagans to the fold. Keep up there, uscit.Wait a minute! I thought you said the eggs were passover vittles ?