Many historians
i might rethink it that way then; the idea of no gun zones is to stop crimes of passion (mostly), a guy with a bad mariage doesn't get to kill his wife at work.Not necessarily, but adding guards who are complacent (which most guards are) is just as dangerous (as is adding overzealous ones). The 'best' option is to allow people to carry (Allow, not FORCE). But that's not a guarantee.
Crimes of passion are a non issue. Of course, so are mass shootings, so yeah. You can't write laws that affect .00000000565% percent of the population.i might rethink it that way then; the idea of no gun zones is to stop crimes of passion (mostly), a guy with a bad mariage doesn't get to kill his wife at work.
But with these random shootings...well I can't srgue with your logic
Most murders are by angry family members
You heard the teabagger, no big deal!By angry MALE family members.
You heard the teabagger, no big deal!
Come on darla it's only 10,000 gun murders per year
Not when they are wearing these...
By angry MALE family members.
It bothers me that Europe has 1/4 the murder rate.
Not that redneck teabaggers even know where Europe is.
Not definitively. There are other forms of ball sucking.
I'm going to spend a month in ParisMove to Europe and smoke hash mixed with disgusting tobacco like Tom does. Why do you think he is so unhappy?
Spend some time in Amsterdam and bring backs some seeds.I'm going to spend a month in Paris
I'll let you know how I like it
The dude is strictly high grade sensiMove to Europe and smoke hash mixed with disgusting tobacco like Tom does. Why do you think he is so unhappy?
I'm going to spend a month in Paris
I'll let you know how I like it
Crimes of passion, so fucking called, also need opportunity.
A woman living in a home where guns are present is three times more likely to be murdered.