More sexual perversion!

Where is your condemnation of all the child beauty pageants that are still going on in this country even after Jon Benet's murder?

Mine is right here, Christiecrite.

Meanwhile...


flag-on-the-play-whataboutism-what-about-your-inability-to-actually-argue-the-point-sparky.jpg
 
I don't recall claiming otherwise. In the interest of consistency, then, you think Cuties should not be available?

Right?
Answer, Christiecrite. :burn:

I didn't watch it and don't have the desire to see innocent children exploited even as a cautionary tale. And I can't say whether or not it should be available, especially given how much lying RWNJs are trying to pin this movie on liberals.
 

I've never watched a child "beauty pageant", yet I condemn them universally and have no hesitation in saying they should be prohibited.

cuties.gif



I vehemently oppose the continued streaming of the movie “Cuties” on Netflix, and request that you voluntarily remove it from your service due to the great harm it causes to our children.

While the filmmaker’s asserted desire to fight the hypersexualization of young girls is admirable, the manner in which the film attempts to do so is misguided and does more harm than good.

This film contains the gratuitous exposure of a young girl’s breast; it repeatedly shows children using their bodies in a sexual manner to get themselves out of trouble; it graphically focuses on the genitalia of children; and it shows the creation and publication of child pornography.

Repeated images of eleven-year old children gyrating, “twerking,” and simulating sex in tight,skimpy clothes simply serves as fodder for those with criminal imaginations, serving to normalize the view that children are sexual beings.

It whets the appetites of those who wish to harm our children in the most unimaginable ways—ways I have had to prosecute.In this era where we are fighting a seemingly never-ending battle against human trafficking, this film is counterproductive.

The sexualization of our children leads traffickers to view them as commodities that can be sold, over and over again. Traffickers often step in when children face vulnerabilities similar to those of the protagonist in “Cuties.”

We should be teaching our children about healthy conversations and safe spaces to deal with their vulnerabilities, not normalizing hypersexualization as a way to become “popular” and a means to work through the issues they might face in their everyday lives. In short, this film does immeasurable damage to all of us fighting to keep our children safe.

https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Files/Briefing-Room/News-Releases/Human-Trafficking/9-14-20-Netflix.aspx
 
I've never watched a child "beauty pageant", yet I condemn them universally and have no hesitation in saying they should be prohibited.

Like I said, RW scum here claimed that liberals would love this this foreign movie by a foreign director because "the left supports pedophilia." If you think I'm going to take their word about the content, think again. This isn't a left v. right issue, any normal person is disturbed about exploitation of children. A few people here who watched it and said it wasn't porn at all, it was about how little girls are hypersexualized and swayed by internet culture. That makes it different from stuff like Toddlers & Tiaras that has no redeeming social value. I still have no plans to watch it.
 

Let the record show that Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film containing the gratuitous exposure of a young girl’s breast; a film that repeatedly shows children using their bodies in a sexual manner to get themselves out of trouble; a film that graphically focuses on the genitalia of children; a film that shows the creation and publication of child pornography.

Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film containing repeated images of eleven-year old children gyrating, “twerking,” and simulating sex in tight,skimpy clothes that simply serves as fodder for those with criminal imaginations, serving to normalize the view that children are sexual beings.

Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film which whets the appetites of those who wish to harm children.
 
Let the record show that Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film containing the gratuitous exposure of a young girl’s breast; a film that repeatedly shows children using their bodies in a sexual manner to get themselves out of trouble; a film that graphically focuses on the genitalia of children; a film that shows the creation and publication of child pornography.

Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film containing repeated images of eleven-year old children gyrating, “twerking,” and simulating sex in tight,skimpy clothes that simply serves as fodder for those with criminal imaginations, serving to normalize the view that children are sexual beings.

Christiecrite refuses to condemn a film which whets the appetites of those who wish to harm children.

You're just so dishonest. I haven't seen the movie and have no idea what kind of scenes are in it. You claim it's so offensive yet apparently you watched it so who's the hypocrite here?
 
I've never watched a child "beauty pageant", yet I condemn them universally and have no hesitation in saying they should be prohibited.

And yet you vote for a president who ran child beauty pageants, and admitted to intentionally barging into the dressing room.

Back to the Ignore for Legion.
 
I suppose Trump and Epstein would have seen it a a recruiting movie. That is the age of girls they were fucking. Ghislaine would have been sent there immediately .
 
The slippery slope to normalizing pedophilia is getting quite slick!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/20/netflix-pandering-pedophiles-everywhere/

Netflix, in a new series called “Cuties,” is blatantly sexualizing little girls. And tens of thousands have already signed a petition demanding the show’s removal from public streaming.

But how could such a horrifying show make it past the pitch room in the first place?

Netflix, the media company that panders to the pedophile crowd. What a brand concept.

TOP STORIES
'Riding the Dragon': Documentary probes Hunter Biden's dealing in China
Nevada city threatens company for hosting Trump rally
Will Antifa and Black Lives Matter cancel the Biden-Harris ticket?

“Netflix is premiering *Cuties* on September 9,” tweeted one member of the Catholic cloth, as Mediaite reported. “Here’s the plot summary — the promotional image is 11 year olds dressed in clothes inappropriate for adults (so bad I won’t tweet it). I can’t believe we need to say pedophilia is wrong … But so many went to Epstein’s Island.”

Even the program description from Netflix sounds bad.

It first read, “Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family’s traditions.”

After mass outrage, Netflix issued an apology and watered down the descriptive text.

The new Netflix billing reads: “Eleven-year-old Amy starts to rebel against her conservative family’s traditions when she becomes fascinated with a free-spirited dance crew,” Netflix writes of its series.

But if pictures say a thousand words, just watch the trailer.

The phrase “free-spirited” is somewhat of a misnomer. All that’s missing is the pole. Let’s remember: 11-year-olds are generally sixth graders. They color with crayons, they jump rope for fun, they giggle at members of the opposite sex. They watch cartoons on Saturday mornings.

Except on Netflix, where they serve as booty-shaking sex dolls for the pervert class. Apparently.

More than 41,000 have signed the Change.org petition to remove the show from Netflix. Good.

You guys almost happily elected a pedophile to the US Senate in Alabama. Don't go pointing your fingers at Democrats you soulless perverts!
 
Back
Top