Keep pace with the thread.
My posts in this thread deal with this one new thing they have come up with. I have stated that I won't get back into it because of the totally worthless repeat pattern we enter.
I spent days and days talking to him about this, and nothing he presents is new or hasn't already been spoken of.
While I don't necessary think that it was an "inside job", I am suspicious anyway. I just point out irrelevant and unnecessary paths, such as one that a chemical reaction that would produce an obvious spectacle and "smoking gun" type of proof for theorists was used. It wasn't this. I think it is far more likely that they had some people plant explosives within the building to make the effect than it is they used something that would be so extremely evident as this. I think that evidence of such was likely found, but suppressed and hidden to protect some idiot bureaucrat's job.
Here's why you were reluctant to just come out and say what you think ..
Not you or anybody else here has offered any explanation at all to the question this thread is all about. Finding evidence of thermite in all three buildings is a shock because there is no rational reason why any evidence of it should be found in any of the buildings.
When FEMA first discovered it, it was ignored by the subsequent NIST study. How is it possible that NIST would have ignored such critical evidence?
Nano-thermite could not be accidentally present in dust samples collected at four different sites, nor could it be the result of clean-up operations at ground zero, as one of the samples was retrieved a mere ten minutes or so after the collapse of the second tower. All samples show the same consistency.
This would explain the streams of molten steel (not aluminum) falling from one of the towers, and the fact that steel remained molten in the rubble for more than a month after the event. There is no scientific explanation for this other than the use of Thermite, which can achieve temperatures of 3500 C, while under ideal conditions jet fuel can achieve just approximately 285 C. It would also explain the otherwise physically impossible near freefall speed of the three buildings, and how they were able to fall so homogeneously.
Not only did NIST ignore talking about it, they ignored testing for it. AND, the Bush Administration quickly scooped up all the debris and sent it to China and India with the quickness before ANY thorough investigation could take place. They did not want it tested, else, what was the secret?
AND, they REMOVED CRITICAL EVIDENCE from each of the crime scenes.
Quick .. one of you defenders of the official story call me a liar and say that no critical evidence was removed by the Bush Administration .. so I can slap you again with information you don't fucking know becauise you never fucking researched a goddamn thing.
Additionally, is it unreasonable to expect that you'd be able to support some idea of how anyone could have possibly planted explosives of any kind with the security that surrounded these buildings given the clients they had AND the head of security being the most knowledgeable person within the FBI on counter-terrorism AND with him EXPECTING there would be a terrorist attack on the United States, specifically New York?
Is it unreasonable to expect you'd have some idea of how your theory could possibly happen?
