Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Modifying posts again eh? sad.
nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
I am once more inviting you to read the evidence that was provided in the thread, instead of believing in the magical thermite produced only by the thermite faerie.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
But if thermite components are indeed all over, it would be impossible to differentiate the thermite used from the ambient thermite. Do you get the logic I'm using, it's simple. The prevalance of thermite all over does not meant thermite was not used. Do you get it?
It would be nice if you would at least use the low-hanging fruit of the thread to inform yourself just a tiny bit before you started in on these things. We linked to the studies which explain the methodology and what they found. (Even the exact studies used by the conspiracy theorists).
Except, if you had read the evidence provided you would know that there would be more of the substances than expected because of what would need to be there in order to effect the failure of the building. When testing for this they found that there was not enough of the substances in evidence to point to that, and in every case were able to find a source far different than the magical non-marking thermite.
You would also know that it leaves unmistakable traces that are not minute or in dust that were not evident but would have been found in massive amounts during the cleanup and would have been on tape and in huge amounts of photos, the site was covered constantly with cameras and video. It wouldn't have been just one tiny thing that people would be hanging their hopes on, it would be an easy to spot smoking gun.
Instead you keep focusing on what is already been given in evidence by actual experts so that you can maintain this ignorant facade and repeat questions that have been already covered. As I said before, you remain willfully ignorant of the evidence that has been provided because you simply refuse to look at it. It is inconvenient to your world view.
I may distrust the government, but it doesn't have to make me illogical and deliberately ignorant.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Woulda shoulda coulda, damo. Woulda shoulda coulda.
Yeah.
If you woulda read the thread, if you coulda used the information had you read in it, then you shoulda been able to argue better than this.
LOL..
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Ok. That was good. I think hear my mother calling. Later, skater.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
You can be pretty sure about anything you choose to believe my brother .. changes absolutely nothing about my response to you in post #41.
Let me get this straight .. you contention is that forensic investigators can't tell the difference between unreacted thermite from car and bicycle parts and other everyday chemicals.
If that's what you're saying ..
... I have no words.
You can believe whatever bullshit you choose to believe and you can ignore what evidence you choose to ignore. What you ignore isn't really the point I'm making.
I'm betting there were more people who thought Saddam had WMD then there are who believe the fairy-tale you do.
... and that number is growing as more evidence like THERMITE is revealed.
Whether you believe it ain't really the point my brother.
Just for giggles, how do you reconcile ignoring what the DESIGNERS and the BUILDERS of the towers and a WHITE PAPER STRUCTURAL STUDY have to say.
Is that what you call "owning?"
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Found any evidence of your pancake theory yet?
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
I haven't made any statements about the legitimacy of anything like a pancake theory. My only contributions in this thread have been to blow out of the water any notion that thermite was used to bring down the towers. Trying to pin all sorts of theories about the towers collapse upon me as though I had the obligation to prove them is silly since I haven't made any claims about them.
There is no evidence that thermite was used to bring down the towers. In fact, there's plenty of evidence to contradict the idea that thermite was used. That's really all there is to it. You're one dumb sumumma bitch for continuing to hang your hat on this very loose, unsupported (in fact contradicted) idea of yours.
1/3
thank you! You said exactly what I wanted to say. The camera jockey posing as a scientist in this thread is very amusing. And you summed up the stupidity of his logic very nicely.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
This was totally an inside job. the braindead liars don't have well formed views of anything and careen wildly from explanation to explanation, many of which are mutually exclusive to one another, indicating a paucity of clear thinking and coherency.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
The dumb son-of-a-bitch is the idiot that believes forensic investigators can't tell the difference between unreacted theirmite and bicycle parts.
That duimb-son-fo-a-bitch would be YOU.
That is your argument, correct?
It's stupid as fuck.
If it wasn't thermite, shouldn't you have an alternative opinion of what brought the towers down? Would you care to share that opinion?
What other crash/fire sites can you point to where car parts were misread as thermite?
And what again is your argument to why the site stayed hot longer than any in history? Is it possible for you to articulate that yourself without pointing to some massive read where it's "somewhere?"
AND, even more revealing is that you like Damo RUN AWAY from even addressing what those who built the towers have to say.
It seems I've had too high an opinion of your debate capabilities.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
You may have a 6th graders understanding of science, but you're real good at stuff like this.
What did you do .. look uo dick sausages .. or is this from a collection?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
... but seem to have a firm grasp of dick sauages.
These are the leaders of the fairy-tale believers.