so the intent of the thread was to show that liberals can use hyped up media and gory pictures to deceive the public in to pressing their agenda?And as per usual the right wingers have done their best ot derail the intent of this thread to gun control and magazine sizes....
sheesh.
they are either being decietful or did not understand the OP at all.
Decietful or stupid....
do cops carry guns with them for the express purpose of killing americans then?The only problem with your lame argument is that hammers, swimming pools, cars were not made or he express purpose of killing.
no.so the intent of the thread was to show that liberals can use hyped up media and gory pictures to deceive the public in to pressing their agenda?
so the intent of the thread was to show that liberals can use hyped up media and gory pictures to deceive the public in to pressing their agenda?
yes.do cops carry guns with them for the express purpose of killing americans then?
We could not see them becuase it would have cut into the fervor for war.
Media control. The was was pretty much "sanitized" for the US population.
At the same time the media was promoting the war.
splitting atoms started out to be a war weapon, but damned if it doesn't beat coal and oil for energy creation.And yet they do a much better job of it anyways. Dynamite was made to be a war weapon but damned if it didn't beat shovels and picks for mining.
asking a question is 'blathering' now?You are blathering on two threads now.
then tell zappa that cops are indeed trained to shoot innocent people.yes.
then tell zappa that cops are indeed trained to shoot innocent people.
I think that it's you who does not know what you're saying, because government leaders will tell you that cops carry guns to defend themselves, not to kill people. it's usually only cops who are in trouble that will tell you that guns are for them to kill people.That is not what I said and you know it. Or maybe you do not...![]()
And using SF's logic if Nuclear power cannot be made perfectly safe we should do nothing to try and make it less dangerous.
Damn that lead shielding, just put the nuke waste in the rivers, etc.
Guns can be used for many things, killing is one. Cars may not be made for killing, but they kill more each year due to misuse that guns do.
Guns are not meant for people to go around shooting innocent people. People choose to misuse them for that purpose. The point I am making is that you are not going to stop such events by going on a banning spree. You will go for clips that hold more than ten rounds now, then come back for those that have 8/6/4/2/1 until you realize that has nothing to do with stopping such tragedies. You and many others continually ignore that it takes less than a couple seconds to change clips.
You then want to chant 'ban assault rifles', yet you don't know what they are and really are just saying it because you hope the fear mongering against 'assault rifles' has made them into a boogey man of weapons in the minds of those that don't know about guns.
Tantrum?
Naah that you your gig not mine.
I am not a drama queen like you are.
Yes nothing would stop ALL useless deaths from guns, however it could and has reduced them.
But keep on with your all or nothing mentality.
I do know what they are, Billy has educated me.