NASA: direct proof of man caused GW

evince said:
Please prove half of the scientific community disagrees with these documented facts


That is an utter fucking lie

You are satans spawn for lying about these facts


Is that eastery enough for you
Click to expand...

those are not "documented facts" they are unproven theories and propaganda. The climate of our planet is controlled by the sun, the earth's tilt on its axis, and ocean currents. CO2 is not a pollutant, without it there would be no life on earth.

The climate religion was created to dupe the gullible like you into living your lives as directed by the super elites, whose rules apply to you but not to them.

The climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years, man has never had anything to do with it, and never will. Even if we had all out nuclear war, the earth would recover over time. We are but a pimple on a gnat on an elephant's ass in terms of the life and climate of this planet.

But feel free to buy the hype and become an unthinking sheep to your masters.
 
redfish said:
those are not "documented facts" they are unproven theories and propaganda. The climate of our planet is controlled by the sun, the earth's tilt on its axis, and ocean currents. CO2 is not a pollutant, without it there would be no life on earth.
Click to expand...

Dude, if you knew anything about science, then you'd understand it's a balance. Water is essential to life but if you are dropped in the middle of the Atlantic, drowning will kill you. Too much oxygen can kill you: Hyperoxia.
 
evince said:
Science thinks your an idiot liar
Click to expand...

answer the question: why can't you separate pollution and climate change? If your goal is to reduce or stop pollution, why isn't that enough? Why do you need a fake climate link to fight pollution? Answer or STFU
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Dude, if you knew anything about science, then you'd understand it's a balance. Water is essential to life but if you are dropped in the middle of the Atlantic, drowning will kill you. Too much oxygen can kill you.
Click to expand...

so now you are saying we have too much oxygen? Yes, its a balance, a natural one and its worked for hundreds of millions of years and will be working hundreds of millions of years after the last human dies.
 
redfish said:
so now you are saying we have too much oxygen? Yes, its a balance, a natural one and its worked for hundreds of millions of years and will be working hundreds of millions of years after the last human dies.
Click to expand...

No. I'm saying you lack a fundamental understanding of the atmosphere.

Do you believe the atmosphere of today is the same as the one as hundreds of millions of years and will be the same hundreds of millions of years after the last human dies?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
No. I'm saying you lack a fundamental understanding of the atmosphere.

Do you believe the atmosphere of today is the same as the one as hundreds of millions of years and will be the same hundreds of millions of years after the last human dies?
Click to expand...

basically, yes. CO2 currently makes up .039% of the atmosphere, from ice cores and fossil records it has been determined that it was at that same level millions of years ago.

Humans are certainly polluting the air and water, but that pollution is NOT changing the overall climate of the planet. So, one final time, why isn't fighting pollution enough for you? 99% of humanity is with you on that, why must you create a fake pollution/climate link? I think I know. Its not really about climate, pollution, or the earth, is it? Its really about trying to control the actions of all humans, except of course the elites who make the rules that don't apply to them. Geez. dude, actually think about this.
 
redfish said:
basically, yes. CO2 currently makes up .039% of the atmosphere, from ice cores and fossil records it has been determined that it was at that same level millions of years ago.

Humans are certainly polluting the air and water, but that pollution is NOT changing the overall climate of the planet. So, one final time, why isn't fighting pollution enough for you? 99% of humanity is with you on that, why must you create a fake pollution/climate link? I think I know. Its not really about climate, pollution, or the earth, is it? Its really about trying to control the actions of all humans, except of course the elites who make the rules that don't apply to them. Geez. dude, actually think about this.
Click to expand...

Ahh, so now it's just "millions of years ago" instead of "hundreds of million of years ago". LOL


Good to see you did a little Googling. Kudos. :thup:

redfish said:
so now you are saying we have too much oxygen? Yes, its a balance, a natural one and its worked for hundreds of millions of years and will be working hundreds of millions of years after the last human dies.
Click to expand...
 
redfish said:
answer the question: why can't you separate pollution and climate change? If your goal is to reduce or stop pollution, why isn't that enough? Why do you need a fake climate link to fight pollution? Answer or STFU
Click to expand...

Your brain is a fucking brick wall



NASA JUST PROVED IT IN REAL TIME YOU SHITTY RUSSIAN BOT HOLE
 
evince said:
In a first-of-its-kind study, NASA has calculated the individual driving forces of recent climate change through direct satellite observations. And consistent with what climate models have shown for decades, greenhouse gases and suspended pollution particles in the atmosphere, called aerosols, from the burning of fossil fuels are responsible for the lion's share of modern warming.
Click to expand...

The proof
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Ahh, so now it's just "millions of years ago" instead of "hundreds of million of years ago". LOL


Good to see you did a little Googling. Kudos. :thup:
Click to expand...

we cannot produce data from hundreds of millions of years ago. But logic tells us that the earth has been going through climatic changes forever. ice ages, hot ages, continental shift, etc. We humans never caused it and never will. Now, back to my question: why isn't fighting pollution enough for you? Why do you think you need the climate narrative in order to fight pollution?
 
redfish said:
we cannot produce data from hundreds of millions of years ago. But logic tells us that the earth has been going through climatic changes forever. ice ages, hot ages, continental shift, etc. We humans never caused it and never will. Now, back to my question: why isn't fighting pollution enough for you? Why do you think you need the climate narrative in order to fight pollution?
Click to expand...

Wrong again, but you seem dead set to go with your beliefs over science. No one can stop you if that's what you choose to do.

Your points exemplify my point; you are mishmashing data, theories and your beliefs into one lumb and calling it fact. No matter since you will just keep believing you know all about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top