You really did stretch this one. The article has nothing to do with employment numbers or failure to pass employee drug tests.
here is more about trumps boomers https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2017-new-unemployment/
You really did stretch this one. The article has nothing to do with employment numbers or failure to pass employee drug tests.
difficult for you to follow was it?
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/busi...nel/business+(OrlandoSentinel.com+-+Business)
so how can a tax cut promote more jobs
here is more about trumps boomers https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2017-new-unemployment/
force these corporations to pay a decent wage
RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE IF YOU WANT HIGHER WAGES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage#Empirical_studies
The Economist wrote in December 2013: "A minimum wage, providing it is not set too high, could thus boost pay with no ill effects on jobs....America's federal minimum wage, at 38% of median income, is one of the rich world's lowest.
I gave you the link you blithering idiot
In Florida, where voters approved an increase in 2004, a follow-up comprehensive study after the increase confirmed a strong economy with increased employment above previous years in Florida and better than in the US as a whole.
I understood it perfectly. But, go ahead and quote the portions that deal with a national worker shortage or failure to pass employment drug tests. You know, your reference to passing piss tests.
Two more moronic statements; you seem to be quite full of them. Your article speaks about truck drivers....they are not minimum wage earners nor are many of the jobs now being created, unlike the Obama Presidency.
You don't get higher wages by forcing low skill employers to pay more than they can for work that does not demand a lot of skill or brains. What you get are FEWER workers you brain dead moron.
You called me a liar because you can't figure out how to click on a link that's all
You really did stretch this one. The article has nothing to do with employment numbers or failure to pass employee drug tests.
difficult for you to follow was it?
I understood it perfectly. But, go ahead and quote the portions that deal with a national worker shortage or failure to pass employment drug tests. You know, your reference to passing piss tests.

You're a liar but that's of course really all you do
Let's see:
A 23 year old druggie in W. Virginia
A 40 year old felon
A 48 year old disabled person
Opioid addiction with no reference to age demographics
A 55 year old with no drug problems
Nope. Nothing about boomers unable to pass pee tests. Just a few sad, anecdotal stories.
Let's see:
A 23 year old druggie in W. Virginia
A 40 year old felon
A 48 year old disabled person
Opioid addiction with no reference to age demographics
A 55 year old with no drug problems
Nope. Nothing about boomers unable to pass pee tests. Just a few sad, anecdotal stories.
You're lying about what it says but that doesn't surprise me. They say a couple million boomers are in their graves already and it won't be too many more years and they all be in their graves so the country will be better off so it's really a moot question

You're lying about what it says but that doesn't surprise me. They say a couple million boomers are in their graves already and it won't be too many more years and they all be in their graves so the country will be better off so it's really a moot question
Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
Let's see:
A 23 year old druggie in W. Virginia
A 40 year old felon
A 48 year old disabled person
Opioid addiction with no reference to age demographics
A 55 year old with no drug problems
Five anecdotal stories:
A 23 year old druggie in W. Virginia
A 40 year old felon
A 48 year old disabled person
Opioid addiction with no reference to age demographics
A 55 year old with no drug problems
Your previous citation said nothing about a national worker shortage or the inability to pass employment drug tests.
Now, go ahead and cite those portions in either story that supports your posts. So far, merely dismal failure on your part.
Of course millions are in their graves. The older ones are already past 70. It won't be too many more years until you'll be in your grave, as well. But that has ZERO to do with your premise.
Are you drinking heavily today?
you are being a typical trump moron. Are you really so stupid as to mot being able to follow simple statements? I guess so.
Wow; DUMBER IQ of 76 is a Trump moron???!! 
you are being a typical trump moron. Are you really so stupid as to mot being able to follow simple statements? I guess so.
Your posts:
1) “Would help if Boomers would get off drugs so they could pass a piss test.” https://www.aarp.org/personal-growth...an-addict.html
Please cite the references to a national worker shortage or the inability to pass employment drug tests.
2)“here is more about trumps boomers” https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...-unemployment/
The story contains 5 anecdotal stories:
A 23 year old druggie in W. Virginia
A 40 year old felon
A 48 year old disabled person
Opioid addiction with no reference to age demographics
A 55 year old with no drug problems
Nothing about boomers unable to pass pee tests.
A trump supporter? lol You really ARE drinking heavily this afternoon!