New atheism

Questioning religious orthodoxy is healthy, and goes back to Martin Luther King, and earlier. You wouldn't have Quakers, Unitarians, let alone atheists, if people didn't question religious orthodoxy.

I don't think there is much to be gained in the grand scheme of things by calling religion evil, and believers idiots. Which is where the New Atheists tend to go.
There is no such thing as 'New Atheists'.
 
I think the New Atheists are right that blind faith should be questioned, and religious orthodoxy challenged.

On the other hand, I don't think the New Atheists are educated and trained in theories of human knowledge. They seem to have almost no awareness of epistomology, and seem to believe a radical positivist reliance on empiricism is the only source of all knowledge and truth.

They don't seem to have actually read any of the primary sacred texts of the major world religions, outside of a passing and cursory familiarity with the Christian bible.

There also don't seem to be any physicists among the New Atheists. Dawkins training in biology is vested in emergent properties of nature. He doesn't have the training and background in the fundamental nature of reality that physicists have
Dawkins is not an ahteist.
 
Infinity is a tricky topic. If the universe was infinitely old, would today ever have gotten here? I don't know the answer to that.
'Today' is a function of the Earth, not the Universe. Time has no meaning other than that we give because we are each mortal.
 
Three decades of global warming denial
No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing. You are again ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
is on the cusp of bringing harm to their children and grandchildren.
What harm???
The deep south and the gulf coast are facing the worst consequences of global warming,
What 'global warming'??? It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
and those happen to be the places with the densest concentrations of climate deniers.
Who is denying climate???
 
No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing. You are again ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Stop being stupid. Nobody, including those who study climate change, have ever said gases create energy. If you're going to engage in a conversation about a topic, at least make yourself knowledgeable about the basics.
What harm???

What 'global warming'??? It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
Opinion stated as fact.
No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing.
(copy/paste from above) Stop being stupid. Nobody, including those who study climate change, have ever said gases create energy. If you're going to engage in a conversation about a topic, at least make yourself knowledgeable about the basics.
You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
You're too ignorant, or love, too much, playing stupid, to acknowledge that nobody studying climate change has ever said such a thing.
 
Stop being stupid.
You are describing yourself again. It is YOU that believes a magick gas can somehow create energy out of nothing.
Nobody, including those who study climate change,
Climate cannot change, Void.
have ever said gases create energy.
Don't try to deny your own posts!
If you're going to engage in a conversation about a topic, at least make yourself knowledgeable about the basics.
Already did. You are ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing.
Opinion stated as fact.(copy/paste from above)
A theory of science is not opinion. It is a fact.
Stop being stupid.
You are describing yourself again, Void. You can't blame your problems on me or anybody else.
Nobody, including those who study climate change,
Climate cannot change, Void.
 
Is anyone an ahteist?
Yes. I know a couple. Atheists don't care whether any god or gods exist or not. They simply don't go there.

Science is atheistic.
Math is atheistic.
Logic is atheistic.

None of them care whether any god or gods exist or not.

Dawkins is not an atheist. He belongs to the Church of No God, a fundamentalist style religion.
 
Yes. I know a couple. Atheists don't care whether any god or gods exist or not. They simply don't go there.

Science is atheistic.
Math is atheistic.
Logic is atheistic.

None of them care whether any god or gods exist or not.

Dawkins is not an atheist. He belongs to the Church of No God, a fundamentalist style religion.

No, you said "ahteist". I was asking about ahteists.
 
Infinity is a tricky topic. If the universe was infinitely old, would today ever have gotten here? I don't know the answer to that.
Days are measured by rotation of earth around the sun. Has nothing to do with eternity.
 
Back
Top