Ninth Circuit rules in favor of federal deportation

volsrocks

Verified User
The federal government has the authority to deport foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally over the objection of local authorities, a panel of three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled.


This will put states that resist the Federal deportation program into a defacto rebellion.

Colorado DNC is about to change their tune. Holman for the win.
 
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law.

:thup:

 
The federal government has the authority to deport foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally over the objection of local authorities, a panel of three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled.


This will put states that resist the Federal deportation program into a defacto rebellion.

Colorado DNC is about to change their tune. Holman for the win.
Yup. It is a federal crime to aid and abet illegal aliens. Anyone doing so can and SHOULD face time in the slammer.
 
Nothing. An illegal alien invasion is a federal issue.

She's doing the best she can, I guess.

iu


Not the sharpest blade, is she?
 
The bill of rights have been "incorporated" - so many state powers have been vaporized
While the federal government has often illegally usurped numerous powers that belong to the states, those powers still constitutionally belong to the states.

A good example that's already been mentioned in this thread is the Roe v Wade ruling (which thankfully FINALLY got overturned). Now that particular power has "been returned" to the states, where it has always constitutionally belonged.
 
While the federal government has often illegally usurped numerous powers that belong to the states, those powers still constitutionally belong to the states.
not true

states used to NOT be constrained by the 1st amendment or 2nd amendment (or any of the 9)

entire cities could ban guns. states could have religious tests - assuming the state constitution allowed it, and so on

After the civil war, the laws changed and state powers were severely curtailed
 
The federal government has the authority to deport foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally over the objection of local authorities, a panel of three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled.


This will put states that resist the Federal deportation program into a defacto rebellion.

Colorado DNC is about to change their tune. Holman for the win.
That's pretty amazing the the Ninth Circus.
 
So states have the right not to enforce federal child porn laws?
Federal laws apply, in most cases, to interstate and international affairs. That is things happening between states and between nations. What happens within a state is for the state to handle.

Illegal immigration is an interstate and international affair. The illegal is not a US citizen and entered the US illegally. Regardless of location in the US that makes their presence a federal crime, one the federal government can prosecute anywhere it occurs. That takes precedence over the state.

Kiddie porn can be a state or federal issue depending on how the perp carries it out.
 
Back
Top