No racial bias in police shootings, study by Harvard professor shows

I hope they are immune to 230 grain jacketed hollow points, jig pecker smoker.

how you going to shoot them from under your mom's bed, hillbilly? all show and no go. creampuff pussy boys buying guns because of their sensitivity of how tiny their dicks are and how wimpy they are when it comes to defending themselves in any way.
 
When did I imply that, Anchovies?

What part of the topic post is supposedly "bogus", Anchovies?

Topic post

And as already explained, the guys paper didn’t say it didn’t occur, rather that there is no quantitative proof it does or doesn’t exist, and secondly, his paper never received peer review (https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/07/...ved-shootings/), meaning, it is his opinion, and that is all

And lastly, the guy was fired by Harvard for accusations of sexual conduct (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...en/1693011001/) and not be published a paper as “copy and paste” implies

What part is bogus you ask, nearly all of, start to finish
 
how you going to shoot them from under your mom's bed, hillbilly? all show and no go. creampuff pussy boys buying guns because of their sensitivity of how tiny their dicks are and how wimpy they are when it comes to defending themselves in any way.

When you spew bullshit all day long, it doesn't prove you have any idea what you're talking about, and shit stains like you never will.
 

ohtgMxx.gif


Hey jiggy, your mom charges 15 dollars.
 
As usual, “copy and paste” is incorrect, and here on so many levels

First off, the guys paper didn’t say it didn’t occur, rather that there is no quantitative proof it does or doesn’t exist, and secondly, his paper never received peer review (https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/07/15/harvard-study-officer-involved-shootings/), meaning, it is his opinion, and that is all

And lastly, the guy was fired by Harvard for accusations of sexual conduct (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-two-years-over-sexual-harassmen/1693011001/) and not be published a paper as “copy and paste” implies

Typical

LOL what is the null hypothesis?
 
It should be ignored, the paper didn’t conclude racial bias wasn’t a factor, but rather that there is no quantitative proof it does or doesn’t exist, and secondly, his paper never received peer review (https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/07/...ved-shootings/), meaning, it is his opinion, and that is all, just like your barber’s opinion

Fryer was the youngest black person ever given tenure at Harvard. Now because someone has earned tenure at Harvard does not in any way mean what they say can't be questioned or is above reproach. Tenured Harvard professors can be flat out wrong. But you're trying to say this study is no different than what some guy at a barbershop says? Really?
 
Fryer was the youngest black person ever given tenure at Harvard. Now because someone has earned tenure at Harvard does not in any way mean what they say can't be questioned or is above reproach. Tenured Harvard professors can be flat out wrong. But you're trying to say this study is no different than what some guy at a barbershop says? Really?

Archives sounds a bit racist to me.
 
As usual, “copy and paste” is incorrect, and here on so many levels

First off, the guys paper didn’t say it didn’t occur, rather that there is no quantitative proof it does or doesn’t exist, and secondly, his paper never received peer review (https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/07/15/harvard-study-officer-involved-shootings/), meaning, it is his opinion, and that is all

And lastly, the guy was fired by Harvard for accusations of sexual conduct (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-two-years-over-sexual-harassmen/1693011001/) and not be published a paper as “copy and paste” implies

Typical

I still look up whatever story they're talking about, but I never have a fraction of a second of hesitation in knowing before I enter a Trumpist's thread that it's going to be a lie. 100% of the time.
 
Back
Top