Not even Donald Trump can control the monster he created

Libertarians are not communists, fascists or any socialists. You are obviously confused again. Not a sign of intelligence.

Lol, the first Leftists were Capitalists for greater liberty & rights in the French Revolution.
As opposed to the first Right wingers who were for Tradition, Catholic theocracy & the monarchist totalitarian rules.

Of course Libertarians are leftist.

They are the far left.
 
Science isn't a 'study' or 'research'. It isn't a paper, book pamphlet, website, url, government agency, institution, academy, degree, license, certification, sanctification, Universal Truth, proof, scientist, or any group of scientists.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

You believe fairy tales.

What ever pops into your head is absolute reality to you without a shred of evidence.
 
Bigotry. Racism.

Facts, you just don't want to deal with reality.

https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/default+domain/BTWDUK9DbpxPdHMi7Kd7/full

Are some religions more individualistic or collectivist than others? Cohen and colleagues (2005) theorized that in the United States, American Jews and Catholics as well as other groups are relatively more likely to subscribe to collectivistic instantiations of religion, while American Protestants, and perhaps other groups as well, were particularly likely to subscribe to individualistic forms of religion

https://www.jstor.org/stable/256391


This study examined the hypothesis that differences in the cultural norms of Anglo-Americans and three other ethnic groups--Asian, Hispanic, and Black Americans--will result in different behaviors on a group task. Student subjects were assigned to ethnically diverse or all-Anglo groups. Individual and group responses were measured using a Prisoner's Dilemma task in which participants could choose to compete or cooperate with another party. We hypothesized that groups composed of people from collectivist cultural traditions would display more cooperative behavior than groups composed of people from individualistic cultural traditions. Results confirmed this hypothesis. Implications for future research and for organizations seeking to manage diversity are discussed.
 
Have you ever looked up blood types by population!?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_distribution_by_country

https://www.babymed.com/pregnancy-test/ethnic-distribution-of-blood-types#

Highest in Native Americans, Latinos, Africans, Celts, Basque, South East Asians,Arabs, etc.

Lowest in East Asians, East Europeans, Israelis, South Asians.
Matt, more evidence you don’t know how to debate. That’s called goalpost moving. You claimed criminality and lesser cognitive abilities then posted two links which had nothing to do with your claims.

Now you post another link, again, not having anything to do with your spurious claims.

You should stick to debating Sybil. He’s nutty enough to “debate” you.
 
Matt, more evidence you don’t know how to debate. That’s called goalpost moving. You claimed criminality and lesser cognitive abilities then posted two links which had nothing to do with your claims.

Now you post another link, again, not having anything to do with your spurious claims.

You should stick to debating Sybil. He’s nutty enough to “debate” you.

IQ, and or PISA scores of the top 10 highest O blood nations
Vs
IQ, and or PISA scores of the top 10 lowest O blood nations.

Too 10 O blood type nations.
1) Ecuador an IQ of 80 & A PISA score not tested.
2) Peru an IQ of 90 & A PISA score of 360 to 390 ish
3.) Zimbabwe an IQ of 66 & A PISA score not tested.
4.) El Salvador an IQ of 80 & A PISA score untested.
5.) Nicaragua an IQ of 81 & A PISA score untested.
6.) Congo an IQ of 65 & A PISA score untested.
7.) Mexico an IQ of 87 & A PISA score of 409 to 420.
8.) Gabon an IQ of 64 & A PISA score untested.
9.) Honduras an IQ of 81 & A PISA score untested.
10.) Child an IQ of 90 & A PISA score of 417 to 452.

Now the top 10 lowest O blood nations.
1.) Hungary a 99 IQ & A 476 to 481 PISA score
2.) Czech Republic a 97 IQ & A 491 to 497 PISA scorr.
3.) Koreans a 106 IQ & A 514 to 526 PISA score.
4.) Slovakia a 97 IQ & A 458 to 486 PISA score.
5.)Finland a 97 IQ & A 507 to 522 PISA score.
6.) Romania a 94 & A 426 to 430 PISA score.
7.) Bulgaria a 93 IQ & 420 to 436 PISA score.
8.) Moldova a 96 IQ & A 421 to 428 PISA score
9.) Armenia a 94 IQ & A PISA score untested.
10.) Croatia a 90 IQ & A PISA score of 464 to 479.

The average in the least O blood type group appears to have an IQ ave of about 15 points higher & A PISA score of about 150 points higher.

But, whatever O blood is the Master race of Chimp blood type.
 
IQ, and or PISA scores of the top 10 highest O blood nations
Vs
IQ, and or PISA scores of the top 10 lowest O blood nations.

Too 10 O blood type nations.
1) Ecuador an IQ of 80 & A PISA score not tested.
2) Peru an IQ of 90 & A PISA score of 360 to 390 ish
3.) Zimbabwe an IQ of 66 & A PISA score not tested.
4.) El Salvador an IQ of 80 & A PISA score untested.
5.) Nicaragua an IQ of 81 & A PISA score untested.
6.) Congo an IQ of 65 & A PISA score untested.
7.) Mexico an IQ of 87 & A PISA score of 409 to 420.
8.) Gabon an IQ of 64 & A PISA score untested.
9.) Honduras an IQ of 81 & A PISA score untested.
10.) Child an IQ of 90 & A PISA score of 417 to 452.

Now the top 10 lowest O blood nations.
1.) Hungary a 99 IQ & A 476 to 481 PISA score
2.) Czech Republic a 97 IQ & A 491 to 497 PISA scorr.
3.) Koreans a 106 IQ & A 514 to 526 PISA score.
4.) Slovakia a 97 IQ & A 458 to 486 PISA score.
5.)Finland a 97 IQ & A 507 to 522 PISA score.
6.) Romania a 94 & A 426 to 430 PISA score.
7.) Bulgaria a 93 IQ & 420 to 436 PISA score.
8.) Moldova a 96 IQ & A 421 to 428 PISA score
9.) Armenia a 94 IQ & A PISA score untested.
10.) Croatia a 90 IQ & A PISA score of 464 to 479.

The average in the least O blood type group appears to have an IQ ave of about 15 points higher & A PISA score of about 150 points higher.

But, whatever O blood is the Master race of Chimp blood type.

Bigotry.
 
Bigotry. Denial of history.

The First Leftist

TAGS BiographiesEntrepreneurshipHistory of the Austrian School of EconomicsPolitical Theory

05/28/2009Dean Russell
[This essay appears in Essays on Liberty, (volume 1, 1952).Download PDF]

French Revolution
"Liberty Leading the People" (1830)
Eugène Delacroix (1798–1863)
The first leftist would not be popular in America today. That is true because the original leftists wanted to abolish government controls over industry, trade, and the professions. They wanted wages, prices, and profits to be determined by competition in a free market, and not by government decree. They were pledged to free their economy from government planning, and to remove the government-guaranteed special privileges of guilds, unions, and associations whose members were banded together to use the law to set the price of their labor or capital or product above what it would be in a free market.

The first leftists were a group of newly elected representatives to the National Constituent Assembly at the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789. They were labeled "leftists" merely because they happened to sit on the left side in the French Assembly.

The legislators who sat on the right side were referred to as the party of the Right, or rightists. The rightists or "reactionaries" stood for a highly centralized national government, special laws and privileges for unions and various other groups and classes, government economic monopolies in various necessities of life, and a continuation of government controls over prices, production, and distribution.

https://mises.org/library/first-leftist
 
The First Leftist

TAGS BiographiesEntrepreneurshipHistory of the Austrian School of EconomicsPolitical Theory

05/28/2009Dean Russell
[This essay appears in Essays on Liberty, (volume 1, 1952).Download PDF]

French Revolution
"Liberty Leading the People" (1830)
Eugène Delacroix (1798–1863)
The first leftist would not be popular in America today. That is true because the original leftists wanted to abolish government controls over industry, trade, and the professions. They wanted wages, prices, and profits to be determined by competition in a free market, and not by government decree. They were pledged to free their economy from government planning, and to remove the government-guaranteed special privileges of guilds, unions, and associations whose members were banded together to use the law to set the price of their labor or capital or product above what it would be in a free market.

The first leftists were a group of newly elected representatives to the National Constituent Assembly at the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789. They were labeled "leftists" merely because they happened to sit on the left side in the French Assembly.

The legislators who sat on the right side were referred to as the party of the Right, or rightists. The rightists or "reactionaries" stood for a highly centralized national government, special laws and privileges for unions and various other groups and classes, government economic monopolies in various necessities of life, and a continuation of government controls over prices, production, and distribution.

https://mises.org/library/first-leftist

There is no 'left' or 'right'. Communists and fascists have been around since before Plato (although they were not called that back then).
 
Learn English. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Math errors: Failure to select by randN. Failure to use published raw data free of bias. Failure to declare and justify variance. Failure to calculate margin of error. Failure to publish margin of error with summary. Attempted declaration of summary result as raw data. Failure to normalize by paired randR.

Apparently you don't any math either. Someone produces a pretty chart, and you are religiously believing it's gospel.


Same math errors. Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting made up numbers as data is a fallacy.

Are rare point of agreement. You're right, Sybil. Spaz's arguments are full of errors.

Additionally, he can't debate at all. Is it really a wonder that he's a 36 year old virgin?
Facts hurt your feelings.
 
Random numbers are not a measure of intelligence. IQ is a meaningless number.

They are certainly not random numbers, however, their value can be disputed. They do have a system for measuring it. Therefore you do not know what random numbers are. You have made that claim wrongly before.
 
Are rare point of agreement. You're right, Sybil. Spaz's arguments are full of errors.

Additionally, he can't debate at all. Is it really a wonder that he's a 36 year old virgin?

mi93giza9lc41.png
 
They are certainly not random numbers, however, their value can be disputed. They do have a system for measuring it. Therefore you do not know what random numbers are. You have made that claim wrongly before.

They are random numbers of type randU. Making up numbers is not measuring anything.
 
Back
Top