Now We Need To Revisit Lt. Michael Byrd

IBDaMann said:
Lt. Michael Byrd assassinated an unarmed, peaceful Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.

Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.

10980264_082721-cc-ap-Michael-Byrd-img.jpeg
Click to expand...
On point, he needs to go to trial for any hope of justice for an innocent girl that was gunned down in cold blood. Just imagine if a cop shot and killed a BLM protester that was unarmed and not advancing on the officer. Shit, even if he was 7 feet tall with fire in his eyes charging at the cop, the officer would be instantly proclaimed guilty by the press and every libtard in the America and abroad, then likely convicted and jailed. I know I'm stating the obvious.
 
IBDaMann said:
Lt. Michael Byrd assassinated an unarmed, peaceful Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.

Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.

10980264_082721-cc-ap-Michael-Byrd-img.jpeg
Click to expand...
Random words. No apparent coherency.
 
anonymoose said:
No. Just saying that the word “peaceful” seems to be having less meaning these days.
Kinda like ‘racism’ or ‘racist’, practically obsolete.
Wouldn’t you agree?
Click to expand...
Your defense of RW violence is noted.

I'm against all violent protestors and believe they belong in prison. Instead, We, the People, have a White Nationalist President who pardons violent White Nationalists who attacked Congress and sought to violate the Constitution by stopping the certification of the 2020 election. YMMV
 
IBDaMann said:
What fact? Oh wait, you don't know what a fact is. You don't know really what anything is, just that you HATE views that differ from what you have been ordered to believe, and that you need a strawberry safe space as a refuge from the free-thinkers of the world.
Click to expand...
It's adorable when she pulls out the dictionary in an effort to shake off the dumbass drone label she's so thoroughly earned and then picks the wrong word, lol.

I thought I'd try to help her because I'm a caring guy. This is for you @AProudLefty -
Obfuscation - the action of making something obscure, unclear, or unintelligible.
 
Tobytone said:
On point, he needs to go to trial for any hope of justice for an innocent girl that was gunned down in cold blood. Just imagine if a cop shot and killed a BLM protester that was unarmed and not advancing on the officer. Shit, even if he was 7 feet tall with fire in his eyes charging at the cop, the officer would be instantly proclaimed guilty by the press and every libtard in the America and abroad, then likely convicted and jailed. I know I'm stating the obvious.
Click to expand...
6dlqt1.jpg
 
serendipity said:
You know damn.well that if she were a black woman you'd be going apeshit crazy about it!
Click to expand...
You really are a fucking moron, Tom. The only good thing about you is your support to depose King Rama. :thup:

Meanwhile, in the US, not a peep out of MAGAts about these shootings:
www.nbcnews.com

Protester of ‘Cop City’ near Atlanta was shot by police at least 57 times, autopsy says

Wounds were found throughout the body of Manuel Paez Teran, who was hit in the head, torso, hands and legs, the DeKalb County medical examiner said.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
A slain protester who opposed construction of a vast law enforcement training center near Atlanta was shot at least 57 times in a police confrontation, an autopsy revealed Thursday.

The wounds suffered by Manuel Paez Teran, 26, were so extensive that a loose round "fell from the left sleeve of one of the shirts" as coroners were undressing the body for examination, the DeKalb County medical examiner said.


www.fox5dc.com

Protest at site of deadly DC police shooting after body cam footage released

Police have shut down streets in Southeast D.C. in anticipation of protests where a Violence Interrupter for the city was shot and killed by D.C. police last week.
www.fox5dc.com www.fox5dc.com
Body camera footage released by police shows Robinson, unconscious in his car after crashing into the McDonald's, allegedly trying to grab an officer's gun through a window before being shot.


The officers involved are currently on administrative leave.
 
IBDaMann said:
Lt. Michael Byrd assassinated an unarmed, peaceful Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.

Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.

10980264_082721-cc-ap-Michael-Byrd-img.jpeg
Click to expand...
Byrd panicked and murdered Babbitt. There were 3 armed LEOs in the crowd behind Babbitt. They did not feel threatened by Babbitt. Byrd should have arrested Babbitt not executed her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top