yes, he called her to thank and encourage her
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-calls-student-contraception-fight-takes-nasty-turn-205613479.html
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-calls-student-contraception-fight-takes-nasty-turn-205613479.html
Rush apologists are really out in force tonight...
More like supporters of the hypocrisy mirror for liberals to take a cold hard look at themselves. Rush is a big mouth- but he's entitled to have a big mouth. He used a pretty disparaging analogy, but he is spot on with that analogy. Why should anyone be responsible to pay for the sex habits of someone- especially in light of there being so much free or low cost contraception? Liberals want the government out of their bedrooms, but ask that the government pay for their sex habits? They want the government to overstep constitutional authority to do it? Fuck no- excuse the pun.
onceler, the king obama apologist.....
Please excuse my ignorance on this but if someone doesn't have insurance what does birth control cost to get? (Not a rhetorical question I have absolutely no idea)
More like supporters of the hypocrisy mirror for liberals to take a cold hard look at themselves. Rush is a big mouth- but he's entitled to have a big mouth. He used a pretty disparaging analogy, but he is spot on with that analogy. Why should anyone be responsible to pay for the sex habits of someone- especially in light of there being so much free or low cost contraception? Liberals want the government out of their bedrooms, but ask that the government pay for their sex habits? They want the government to overstep constitutional authority to do it? Fuck no- excuse the pun.
limburger seems to be ignorant of how birth control pills work, he must think that they are used like condoms
but then that is the rep stronghold, ignorance, especially sexual ignorance
No, I get the distinct impression he just does not think that tax payers should be forced to pay for them.
where do you get taxpayers paying for her contraceptives?
also, several years of paying for contraceptives is cheaper than covering one pregnancy
insurers paying for contraceptives is cheaper than not
not all contraceptives are used for contraceptive purposes
also, what about insurers paying for viagra, paying men to screw
when a contraceptive is used, at least two people benefit
Government money (the peoples taxes) paying birth control coverage is a taxpayer cost.
Justifying coverage by that kind of logic is equal to the government mandating the cost of protective gear for athletes- One cost of protective gear is cheaper then covering one major injury.
Planned parenthood provides every woman with 1 year of free contraceptives.
Not all insurers pay for viagra- but impotence is a medical condition- sexual activity is not.
No one is denying the benefits of contraceptive use.
Contraception is free for most people in the UK. What boggles my mind is the same people that frown on abortion also refuse to countenance free contraception.Rush just ensured that this won't be the year the GOP makes any headway in the gender gap...