Obama: Marijuana No More Dangerous Than Alcohol

The Dude

Banned
Obama: Marijuana No More Dangerous Than Alcohol

01/19/2014

Barack Obama
With a majority of Americans now in favor marijuana legalization, President Barack Obama is now saying weed is no more dangerous to individuals' health than alcohol.

In an interview with the New Yorker's David Remnick published Sunday, Obama said while he believes marijuana is "not very healthy," the drug isn't as harmful as some insist.

“As has been well documented, I smoked pot as a kid, and I view it as a bad habit and a vice, not very different from the cigarettes that I smoked as a young person up through a big chunk of my adult life. I don’t think it is more dangerous than alcohol," Obama told Remnick.

When asked if he believes marijuana is less harmful than alcohol, Obama said it is less damaging "in terms of its impact on the individual consumer."

"It’s not something I encourage, and I’ve told my daughters I think it’s a bad idea, a waste of time, not very healthy," he added.

Marijuana is currently classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration as a Schedule 1 substance, which the DEA considers "the most dangerous class of drugs with a high potential for abuse and potentially severe psychological and/or physical dependence." Other Schedule 1 drugs include heroin, ecstasy and LSD.

Obama said his focus on reforming laws that punish drug users, noting the racial disparity in drug arrests.

"We should not be locking up kids or individual users for long stretches of jail time when some of the folks who are writing those laws have probably done the same thing," he said.

In August, the Obama administration announced it would not stop Washington and Colorado from legalizing recreational marijuana use, marking a major step away from the administration's war on drugs.

In the New Yorker interview, Obama said he believes these new laws are "important."

“It's important for it to go forward because it’s important for society not to have a situation in which a large portion of people have at one time or another broken the law and only a select few get punished," he said.
 
What would you expect a pot head to say ? The science is not with him so a poor excuse to use. Of course science is not the long suit if the left. Legalizze drugs for the right reason, to remove the lifeblood of organized crime. But dont tax it to where the black market can beat the price. Give the smack away and sell the pot low enough that its not worth it to have a blavk market.
 
What would you expect a pot head to say ? The science is not with him so a poor excuse to use. Of course science is not the long suit if the left. Legalizze drugs for the right reason, to remove the lifeblood of organized crime. But dont tax it to where the black market can beat the price. Give the smack away and sell the pot low enough that its not worth it to have a blavk market.

Please supply the science that "is not with him", thanks.
 
Oh, if the doper-in-chief says it's okay, guess I'll go buy me an ounce...NOT!!! Why should I believe him on this when his track record on almost everything else sucks so bad?
 
What would you expect a pot head to say ? The science is not with him so a poor excuse to use. Of course science is not the long suit if the left. Legalizze drugs for the right reason, to remove the lifeblood of organized crime. But dont tax it to where the black market can beat the price. Give the smack away and sell the pot low enough that its not worth it to have a blavk market.
Really? Why don't you go ahead and prove the science is not with him.

6000 years of human history disagree.

Actually, I can't even believe you think alcohol is safer than pot! You are;

a. seriously delusional
b. stupid
3. uniformed
D. all of the above.

If you guessed D. you win!
 
Oh, if the doper-in-chief says it's okay, guess I'll go buy me an ounce...NOT!!! Why should I believe him on this when his track record on almost everything else sucks so bad?

Is it because you are capable of independent thought? I didn't think so.

Only a total idiot would think booze is safer than weed.
 
:rofl2:

"It’s not something I encourage, and I’ve told my daughters I think it’s a bad idea, a waste of time, not very healthy," he added.

but its OK for the peasants....
 
it's a step in the right direction, but we all know it's not even comparable to alcohol. more people died from alcohol poisoning during his speech than have ever died from marijuana in the history of mankind.
 
Oh, if the doper-in-chief says it's okay, guess I'll go buy me an ounce...NOT!!! Why should I believe him on this when his track record on almost everything else sucks so bad?

Because, as you know, all that tedious bilge of yours is just because he is 'black', and you don't really want to be kept of the drugs for mere propaganda, surely?
 
so the federal government can tell a person if they can or cannot plant a rose bush in their front yard via the commerce clause?

You'd be surprised what power the fed. gov. already has over you.....if you would have watched Stossel last night, you would have learned the truth...The gov. regulators can
prevent or make it impossible for you do just about anything they put their minds to...there are untold thousands of pages of rules and regulations that you and I
know nothing about. Every profession, from cab driving to floral arrangement, is now burdened with complex rules.

War on the Little Guy


Marty the Magician performed magic tricks for kids, including the traditional rabbit-out-of-a-hat. Then one day: "I was signing autographs and taking pictures with children and their parents," he told me. "Suddenly, a badge was thrown into the mix, and an inspector said, 'Let me see your license.'"
 
You'd be surprised what power the fed. gov. already has over you.....if you would have watched Stossel last night, you would have learned the truth...The gov. regulators can
prevent or make it impossible for you do just about anything they put their minds to...there are untold thousands of pages of rules and regulations that you and I
know nothing about. Every profession, from cab driving to floral arrangement, is now burdened with complex rules.

War on the Little Guy


Marty the Magician performed magic tricks for kids, including the traditional rabbit-out-of-a-hat. Then one day: "I was signing autographs and taking pictures with children and their parents," he told me. "Suddenly, a badge was thrown into the mix, and an inspector said, 'Let me see your license.'"

are those not unconstitutional?
 
What would you expect a pot head to say ? The science is not with him so a poor excuse to use. Of course science is not the long suit if the left. Legalizze drugs for the right reason, to remove the lifeblood of organized crime. But dont tax it to where the black market can beat the price. Give the smack away and sell the pot low enough that its not worth it to have a blavk market.


Sorry...I hate to break it to you, but the science IS with him on this.
 
so the federal government can tell a person if they can or cannot plant a rose bush in their front yard via the commerce clause?

actually.. yes. I remember a case that the feds told farmers in the midwest that they couldn't plant a certain amount of corn or something.
 
Back
Top