Obama suggests value-added tax may be an option

Spare me. The fact is, taxes for people earning under $250K have gone DOWN under Obama, and the IRS reported that the average tax bill this year as a % of income was down over the previous year.

um.... ya think that might be due to capital losses they were able to deduct due to the market downturn?

That $3 a month or whatever the tax credit provides is not likely noticed by most people. Especially by those still waiting after a year for the stimulus to actually create jobs.

That said, I do agree with Dung that Obama simply saying the VAT is still on the table is pretty meaningless. It would be political suicide for the Dems to actually try and pass it. It is one of the most regressive taxes they could implement. As much as the Dems try so very hard to shoot themselves in the foot time and again, even they are that friggin stupid.

In my opinion, he is hedging a bit because Volcker suggested it. Anyone else and he probably would have simply said... uh... NO.
 
Nah; you better. I know what's in the proposal. I have researched it (and I didn't get my facts from "redstates.com" or Mike Savage...)

seriously? Please don't start using the tired mantra of idiots like Cypress that always suggest that people with opposing viewpoints are getting their info from fringe websites.

That said... to be clear, I am not suggesting you haven't researched the issue. I just hate that idiotic tactic used by the morons of the site. (and yes, there are some on the right that do it too)
 
"Yurtle" has no negative connotations, such as "dunce."

More lies. More hypocrisy.

More yawns.

actually, yurtle is a turtle and turtles are KNOWN to be SLOW. Dunce is another way of calling someone SLOW. So essentially you are saying the same thing, just in a more clever manner.

:cool:
 
seriously? Please don't start using the tired mantra of idiots like Cypress that always suggest that people with opposing viewpoints are getting their info from fringe websites.

That said... to be clear, I am not suggesting you haven't researched the issue. I just hate that idiotic tactic used by the morons of the site. (and yes, there are some on the right that do it too)

First, let me say that I am flattered, sir, to have garnered 3 consecutive responses from you on this thread. I'm pressed for time, so will only reply on this one for now, though the turtle post did elicit a genuine chuckle.

I would not suggest that people with opposing viewpoints only get their info from fringe websites; only Tutu, who has made it abundantly clear with dozens of cut & pastes from such sites, and who rarely offers words of his/her own.
 
Just to add - the fact that proposed taxes are not for those under $250K is just that; a fact. Something like that is either a fact or not a fact; it is not a "viewpoint."

And the fact is, until people under $250K are actually paying more in taxes, he is not breaking an "endless" number of promises on the subject.
 
It's a nickname. Yours is a clear ad hom. Apples & oranges.

You just know that you've been caught in a lie, and your hypocrisy has been exposed.

(big stretch) yawn

seriously....thats it...thats all you have...once again, showing your dishonesty and what is so funny, is whine about me calling out people for being hypocrites, yet here are you saying I'm a hypocrite...

your nickname is the same as mine is for you, stop being childish...and you essentially agree that it means the same by "genuinely chuckling" to SF's characterization
 
Last edited:
seriously....thats it...thats all you have...once again, showing your dishonesty and what is so funny, is whine about me calling out people for being hypocrites, yet here are you saying I'm a hypocrite...

your nickname is the same as mine is for you, stop being childish...and you essentially agree that it means the same by "genuinely chuckling" to SF's characterization

The Yurt m.o.! Taking words that have nothing to do with whether I "agree" with the characterization or not, and automatically twisting them to say that yes, I do agree with the characterization. I said his post gave me a chuckle; it did. I did not say - nor do I agree at all - that "Yurtle" and "Dunceler" is an apples to apples.

Dunceler is clearly an ad hom, which you are now desperately doing back-flips to try to equate to the nickname Yurtle, because you realize that you've been caught in more lies. And more hypocrisy.

Thank you for proving me right.

(stretch) (rubs eyes) yawn
 
you're a dishonest idiot....your term for me is not a positive term of endearment, it is an insult and you know it...but continue to lie and look like an idiot to the entire board

you agreed with SF, SF knows its an ad hom, just like my name for you is....you don't fool anyone
 
you're a dishonest idiot....your term for me is not a positive term of endearment, it is an insult and you know it...but continue to lie and look like an idiot to the entire board

you agreed with SF, SF knows its an ad hom, just like my name for you is....you don't fool anyone

More lies; I did not "agree" with SF. I said I chuckled at his post. It's either lies or reading comprehension, but it's probably lies. And hypocrisy. And word twisting. And more lies.

You have shown yourself to be the kind of the ad hom, and proven me right as a result. Many thanks.

(stretch) (rubs eyes) (drinks coffee) yawn
 
More lies; I did not "agree" with SF. I said I chuckled at his post. It's either lies or reading comprehension, but it's probably lies. And hypocrisy. And word twisting. And more lies.

You have shown yourself to be the kind of the ad hom, and proven me right as a result. Many thanks.

(stretch) (rubs eyes) (drinks coffee) yawn

you certainly didn't tell him he was wrong, no, you said you chuckled....

give up onceler, you do not fool anyone

FACT: your term for is not a positive term of endearment, period. to claim otherwise is an outright lie.

but i am sure you will obsess over this for weeks as you usually do
 
you certainly didn't tell him he was wrong, no, you said you chuckled....

give up onceler, you do not fool anyone

FACT: your term for is not a positive term of endearment, period. to claim otherwise is an outright lie.

but i am sure you will obsess over this for weeks as you usually do

Again - I didn't agree with him. I said I chuckled at his post, which was clearly facetious. The fact that you are using it as "proof" that "I agree with him" is hilarious, and a hypocritical lie, from the lying king of ad homs. Yurtle is a nickname; Dunceler is an ad hom. This is indisputable. Your denials prove me right.

Lies & hypocrisy, and major yawnage.
 
Nah; you better. I know what's in the proposal. I have researched it (and I didn't get my facts from "redstates.com" or Mike Savage...)

Start using your brain for a change. Even if the wealthy were taxed to the max, there still wouldn't be enough to pay for what BO is proposing.

Did you see the new CBO report about the rising costs of healthcare?

Thanks for the sites. I've never been to either one.
 
An ad hom, of itself doesn't make anybody "win" an argument or lose one. Now if your only answer to any assertion of theirs is "You're an idiot" then you lose. I don't see that happening with either of you. Just get over it, you both are ad homming.
 
Start using your brain for a change. Even if the wealthy were taxed to the max, there still wouldn't be enough to pay for what BO is proposing.

Did you see the new CBO report about the rising costs of healthcare?

Thanks for the sites. I've never been to either one.

Got it; so, you have nothing on actual proposed tax increases for those under $250K. You're just speculating.
 
Again - I didn't agree with him. I said I chuckled at his post, which was clearly facetious. The fact that you are using it as "proof" that "I agree with him" is hilarious, and a hypocritical lie, from the lying king of ad homs. Yurtle is a nickname; Dunceler is an ad hom. This is indisputable. Your denials prove me right.

Lies & hypocrisy, and major yawnage.

i've denied nothing you silly liar...i've said your name for me is the same, its not a term of endearment, it is a ad hom name....

you're intellectually dishonest by whining that all i contribute to this board is "you prove me right" etc....yet thats all you're doing lately with yoiur posts to me...

i tried to find something positive about your contribution, and all i could think of was ad homs, lies, hypocrisy and immature bullshit like the above....did your mommy give you permission to use the computer today?

have fun obsessing over this, all you are going to do is continuing lying that yoiu mean it in a positive way and continue your childish rantings....

enjoy :clink:
 
Got it; so, you have nothing on actual proposed tax increases for those under $250K. You're just speculating.

That's the standard TuTu M.O.

She can cut-n-paste with the BEST of them. But ask her to back up any allegations made in what she has posted and...........


............POOF..............................



She is G-O-N-E!
 
Jeez - didn't mean to upset you, Yurtle. If you don't like that nickname, I'll go with Yurtsie.

actually, it never bothered me, obviously my nickname bothered you :)

so we don't have to continue to hear you whine about how my nickname for you is an ad hom....would you prefer pounceler, clownceler....?
 
Back
Top