Ok, now that I've heard both, I believe Kavanaugh is telling the truth.

Truth Detector said:
No there are not you simpleton. You have Kavanaugh's testimony, you have his calendar from 1982 and you have sworn statements from everyone Ford named and claimed were at the party saying the event never occurred.

Once again, What do you think they would discover? Seriously? What would they come up with that the Senate already doesn't know or have to make their decision?

Stop parroting the laughably stupid MSNBC talking points and answer the questions.
Click to expand...

Questioning Judge for beginners, evaluating the lie detector test, interviewing the individuals both sides claim have something to offer, etc., etc..
 
Irthriuth said:
the FBI does not have jurisdiction over this and it is not their job. the FBI themselves have said there is nothing for them to investigate. they would only talk to people that have already submitted sworn statements.
Click to expand...

CLARENCE THOMAS DUMMY.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days

(CNN)As Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers insist the FBI investigate her allegation of sexual and physical assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, here is a look back at how the FBI -- in three days -- investigated Anita Hill's sexual harassment allegations against Justice Clarence Thomas came about.

July 1, 1991: President George H.W. Bush nominated then-federal appeals court Judge Thomas to succeed Justice Thurgood Marshall.

September 3, 1991: Hill was first approached by the Judiciary Committee and was invited to provide background information on Thomas because she had worked with him, according to a New York Times article the following month, which cites a written statement from Hill that was sent to news organizations. (That statement adds that Hill decided to submit an affidavit after "numerous discussions" with the panel's staff, the Times reported.)

September 10, 1991: Thomas' initial hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee began.

September 12, 1991: According to then-Sen. Joe Biden, head of the Judiciary Committee, Hill first told the committee of the allegations on this day, as reported in the Times. Biden said she insisted her name not be used and Thomas not be told of the accusations, effectively tying the committee's hands.

September 20, 1991: After Hill spoke with the committee about her allegations "an FBI investigation was suggested" to her, according to comments she made at a news conference early the next month, published in the Times. "I spoke with the Judiciary Committee about it early in September, and through a number of discussions, it was not until the 20th of September that an F.B.I. investigation was suggested to me," Hill said. She later added, "There was a further breakdown even after that, what information would be shared. So there are a number of different points at which the communication broke down, understandings were not carried through."

Hill's comments in the news conference criticized the Judiciary Committee's handling of her complaint, saying she had tried for nearly two weeks in September to put a confidential account of her allegations before the 14 male members of the committee, the Times reported. The Times notes that Hill's account of what happened that September "differed markedly from the accounts offered" by the White House and Biden, "who said Ms. Hill's demand that her statements be kept confidential had impeded the committee."

September 23, 1991: Biden says in a statement reported in the Times that this is the date on which Hill agreed to allow the FBI to investigate the allegations.

Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
 
archives said:
Questioning Judge for beginners, evaluating the lie detector test, interviewing the individuals both sides claim have something to offer, etc., etc..
Click to expand...

Therein lies your ignorance; they only gather statements and information. That information is then handed over to the authority, in this case the Senate, and they judge the information. The FBI doesn't judge the merit of the information in the evidence gathering or the credibility of those they depose.

So I will ask you again; what do you think they would discover? Seriously? What would they come up with that the Senate already doesn't know or have to make their decision?
 
Sailor said:
Bermuda Triangle
Drink Type: Cocktail
Ingredients

1 oz. Peach Schnapps
1/2 oz. Spiced Rum
3 oz. Orange Juice

Instructions
Pour over ice in an old-fashioned glass.
Click to expand...

devil's triangle

That's not the same thing. Why are you changing his words?
 
Guille said:
Really? Then why do we have the circus we have right now?
Click to expand...

Because way to many people, including our own Congress and supposed lawyers have forgotten the basics that our judicial system is founded on. Presumption of innocence. The best thing any of us in this country could do these next few elections is vote everyone of these grandstanding yahoo's out of office. If you are an incumbent, you are out. If you are in.....you are out!
 
blackascoal said:
CLARENCE THOMAS DUMMY.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days

(CNN)As Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers insist the FBI investigate her allegation of sexual and physical assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, here is a look back at how the FBI -- in three days -- investigated Anita Hill's sexual harassment allegations against Justice Clarence Thomas came about.

July 1, 1991: President George H.W. Bush nominated then-federal appeals court Judge Thomas to succeed Justice Thurgood Marshall.

September 3, 1991: Hill was first approached by the Judiciary Committee and was invited to provide background information on Thomas because she had worked with him, according to a New York Times article the following month, which cites a written statement from Hill that was sent to news organizations. (That statement adds that Hill decided to submit an affidavit after "numerous discussions" with the panel's staff, the Times reported.)

September 10, 1991: Thomas' initial hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee began.

September 12, 1991: According to then-Sen. Joe Biden, head of the Judiciary Committee, Hill first told the committee of the allegations on this day, as reported in the Times. Biden said she insisted her name not be used and Thomas not be told of the accusations, effectively tying the committee's hands.

September 20, 1991: After Hill spoke with the committee about her allegations "an FBI investigation was suggested" to her, according to comments she made at a news conference early the next month, published in the Times. "I spoke with the Judiciary Committee about it early in September, and through a number of discussions, it was not until the 20th of September that an F.B.I. investigation was suggested to me," Hill said. She later added, "There was a further breakdown even after that, what information would be shared. So there are a number of different points at which the communication broke down, understandings were not carried through."

Hill's comments in the news conference criticized the Judiciary Committee's handling of her complaint, saying she had tried for nearly two weeks in September to put a confidential account of her allegations before the 14 male members of the committee, the Times reported. The Times notes that Hill's account of what happened that September "differed markedly from the accounts offered" by the White House and Biden, "who said Ms. Hill's demand that her statements be kept confidential had impeded the committee."

September 23, 1991: Biden says in a statement reported in the Times that this is the date on which Hill agreed to allow the FBI to investigate the allegations.

Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html
Click to expand...

What do you think they would discover? Seriously? What would they come up with that the Senate already doesn't know or have to make their decision?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top