By the way, it should be noted that the more current story, well the one from an actual newspaper, shows a significant "improvement" in Colorado, from 5th worst to 13th...(Intersting how your blogspot shows a marked difference, maybe they aren't being accurate?) And all that improvement happened without any commercials, just reporting on the 2004 data. Who do you trust? Your blogspot or the newspaper?
I will also note that the study that was in the first one shows CO to be 37th, not 45th as in the second post of a different 'interpretation' by a blog of the same study.
Where does California rank now? Or can you go back even further and find one that pretends to show current reality, and how the commercials are helping when they haven't been on the air until just recently even though there has been an increase in usage?
Anyway, from your first, and more accurate story:
Anyway, which story is accurate? The one from the news source you posted earlier, or the one from the blog? Both show usage from 2004, one says CO is at 36%, the other 56%.
Did you have to search hard to find one that was "worse" than your first story?
Worst. Spin. Ever.
I don't care where california ranks. I don't care if Colorado is 37th or 45th in terms of food stamp participation. That's not fundamentally important; nor does it have anything to do with the reason you posted this thread.
You asked why they were doing outreach for food stamp programs in colorado.
Darla and I gave you credible answers, that appear to be backed up by the colorado media and experts who did the studies. No need to repeat them, over and over again. You saw them
