Ok. We'll see what happens if Harris wins.
If Harris wins, then Harris wins. However, she isn't even the nominee yet. She does seem to be the person who the DNC are selecting to be their nominee at this point, against the will of "We The Liberal Voter" who wanted Joe Biden to be their nominee. How "democratic" of them!
There's a 99.999% chance that, if Harris wins, MAGA members will convince themselves Trump actually won.
Nope. You continue to get it wrong. IF Harris wins, then Harris wins. However, IF Harris is installed via election fraud, then Harris did NOT win; she was installed via election fraud.
Winning an election = Winning an election.
Being installed via election fraud = Being installed via election fraud.
He may run. Nobody can stop him.
HOLY HELL OF A PARADOX CITY!!!!! Ouch!!!!
1) ZenMode said:
In our life times, Newsom will never run for President.
2) ZenMode said:
He may run. Nobody can stop him.
Which is it?
I've heard that Democrats and Republicans like to win. I guess I could be wrong.
You ARE wrong. While the Democrat Party do like to win, the Republican Party actually like to lose.
So, in 2020 voters didn't pick Biden "they", the Democrat overlords, did?
Yes. The DNC, a whole decade in advance, had selected Joe Biden to be their nominee in 2020, thus they wanted Joe Biden to win (and wanted to stop Bernie Sanders from usurping the win from them). At the very beginning stages of the DNC primary, they even pulled a page from the RNC playbook and implemented the "splitter strategy" (via Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and Warren) in order to stifle Bernie's early momentum in the first few primary states in which Joe Biden performed very poorly.
Those three "splitters" were specifically in the race in order to stifle what would've otherwise been complete Bernie landslides in the first three states (Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada). Bernie still did much better than Joe Biden did, but the "splitters" gobbled up a good number of otherwise Bernie delegates and kept him from "running away with it". Meanwhile, the strategy for Joe Biden himself was to lay low, let the DNC "splitters" keep Bernie in check in the early states, and then put all of his eggs into the South Carolina basket where Clyburn's AME church network is based and which would prop him up. Then, once the "deed was done", Buttigieg and Klobuchar
both immediately dropped out
BEFORE Super Tuesday and
both endorsed Joe Biden, to bolster Joe Biden's performance on Super Tuesday.
Elizabeth Warren, however, did
NOT drop out of the race, even though she was only performing on-par with Klobuchar and WORSE than Buttigieg. Seems rather odd, eh? So why did Warren stay in the race going INTO Super Tuesday even though she didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell at winning? Simple. Certain Super Tuesday states (California, Colorado, Massachusetts, etc...) were
overwhelmingly supportive of Bernie instead of Joe, so Warren had to remain in the race in order to split the "Bernie vote" between herself and Bernie, in order to prop up Joe Biden's Super Tuesday performance. Then, immediately
AFTER Super Tuesday, AFTER the "deed was done", Warren then immediately dropped out.
The rest is history. Do try to learn from it.
Still waiting for True the Vote/Dinesh D'Souza to back ANY of their ballot harvesting claims.
Keep chasing those ghosts!
You've already refused to listen to anyone's evidence that they've presented to you about the matter. You choose to keep your eyes and your ears closed, so my diving into that conversation with you again would be nothing more than a waste of my time and keystrokes.
So you think "they", the Democratic overlords, told 27 Dem candidates to run in 2020?
No. I think that "they", the DNC overlords, told a small handful of Dem candidates to run in 2020... namely Biden, Warren, Klobuchar, and Buttigieg. They all had their roles to play for the DNC, and they all played them well, as explained above. They all even got rewarded for playing their parts well (e.g. Buttigieg got the Dept of Transportation gig for the
Biden Obama 3.0 Regime).
:
