Oops Court slapped down on tariffs. Will Veruca get the sads?

Poor Richard Saunders said:
I guess you really must be Into the Night's sock since you know what he is thinking. And yet you always deny it.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: He already said what he thinks, Richard. I don't have to "know what he is thinking"; I only need the capability to read and comprehend what he has already posted.

You do know that this is a PUBLIC forum, right? That means that the PUBLIC (including me) can read the posts that he makes, and even the posts that YOU make.
 
Trump is assuming powers he does not have. His getting shut down by the Trade Court was expected. Believers in the law wanted it to end there, but it did not. But Trump still does not have a case.
 
Nordberg said:
Trump is assuming powers he does not have. His getting shut down by the Trade Court was expected. Believers in the law wanted it to end there, but it did not. But Trump still does not have a case.
Click to expand...
Doesn’t need a case to get it fast tracked to his SCOTUS, only an appeal’s court decision, like most of Trump’s actions, it is all orchestrated to get to the same end
 
gfm7175 said:
:rolleyes: He already said what he thinks, Richard. I don't have to "know what he is thinking"; I only need the capability to read and comprehend what he has already posted.

You do know that this is a PUBLIC forum, right? That means that the PUBLIC (including me) can read the posts that he makes, and even the posts that YOU make.
Click to expand...
This is a simple exercise in logic.
A prevents B from happening. If A doesn't occur then B must happen.
If Into the Night thinks A is wrong to happen then by logic B must happen.

You argued that Into the Night is saying that the stay is wrong which would require that the lower court ruling be in effect.
 
gfm7175 said:
:rolleyes: He already said what he thinks, Richard. I don't have to "know what he is thinking"; I only need the capability to read and comprehend what he has already posted.

You do know that this is a PUBLIC forum, right? That means that the PUBLIC (including me) can read the posts that he makes, and even the posts that YOU make.
Click to expand...
Frankly, I don't think he gets that.
 
Nordberg said:
Trump is assuming powers he does not have.
Click to expand...
Trump has full authority over the executive branch of government, Sybil. You are ignoring the Constitution again.
Nordberg said:
His getting shut down by the Trade Court was expected.
Click to expand...
That court has no authority on this matter, Sybil. You are ignoring the Constitution again.
Nordberg said:
Believers in the law wanted it to end there, but it did not.
Click to expand...
You don't give a flying fuck about the law or the Constitution, Sybil.
Nordberg said:
But Trump still does not have a case.
Click to expand...
He doesn't need one. The COURT has no case.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
This is a simple exercise in logic.
A prevents B from happening. If A doesn't occur then B must happen.
If Into the Night thinks A is wrong to happen then by logic B must happen.

You argued that Into the Night is saying that the stay is wrong which would require that the lower court ruling be in effect.
Click to expand...
Circular argument fallacy. You deny logic.

No court has any authority over Trump's authority over the executive branch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top