Open poll: is the DNC scared enough to boot Bungling Biden and install the Cackler?

Is the DNC scared enough to boot Bungling Biden and install the Cackler?

  • Yes, I think they could be

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • No, I don't believe they would, no matter what

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Other: explain in comments

    Votes: 4 40.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
You already have laid out your plans, dumbass: you support the violent overthrow of our nation and the mass murder of anyone left of your own Alt-Right POV. If you ever commit a crime as you've repeatedly threatened, your own words will be used against you in court, Matt.

terrorist don't generally want the existing government to declare martial law.
 
and....flooding the zone with bullshit, like you always do.

Because you're a fraud.

Which, again you can't prove. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:

The good news, Fredo, is that you won't be hurt because you would never leave your house to "take back our country" because you are a chickenshit. LOL

64fd35.gif
 
No, the DNC won't install Cum Queen Harris. That doesn't buy them anything. Better that they continue to 2024 with a Weekend at Biden's

Here's why: clamorous criticism has reached a calamitous crescendo and DEMOCRATS appear to be desperate to dodge dissent, IMO.

Maybe they figure that Shamala's complexion and that whored-out hole between her thighs will render her, and their policies, impervious to criticism.

You know the playbook: criticizing a "black" woman's' policies is "racist/sexist/misogynist" etc.

than take a bigger hit installing an utter and complete moron loser like Harris. The Cackling Cum Queen is so pathetic and awful as a political figure I'd say historians a century from now will be looking back in wonder how she got put in office to begin with.

You're assuming that leftists won't be writing the history in the future.
 
Personally I fear the worst, but don't want to lay out the scenario because the evil fuckers don't need any ideas.

They have plenty of examples. Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot...

For example, consider this, from Peter Ackroyd's history Innovation:

"Mussolini made short work of his political opposition, altering the electoral law to his party's advantage...he then proceeded to suppress all other political parties and non-Fascist news sources, and locked up political dissenters. By these means, and with the connivance of the elite, Mussolini established a totalitarian Fascist state...It also restricted personal freedom, with the threat of arrest to any intellectual who opposed Mussolini in word or deed."

Now, replace "Mussolini" with Biden, and "Fascist" with DEMOCRAT.

It all fits, doesn't it?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Innovation-History-England-VI-Book-ebook/dp/B08YZ5M9RF/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1644714275&sr=8-1
 
They have plenty of examples. Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot...

For example, consider this, from Peter Ackroyd's history Innovation:

"Mussolini made short work of his political opposition, altering the electoral law to his party's advantage...he then proceeded to suppress all other political parties and non-Fascist news sources, and locked up political dissenters. By these means, and with the connivance of the elite, Mussolini established a totalitarian Fascist state...It also restricted personal freedom, with the threat of arrest to any intellectual who opposed Mussolini in word or deed."

Now, replace "Mussolini" with Biden, and "Fascist" with DEMOCRAT.

It all fits, doesn't it?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Innovation-History-England-VI-Book-ebook/dp/B08YZ5M9RF/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1644714275&sr=8-1

excellent post.
 
They have plenty of examples. Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot...

For example, consider this, from Peter Ackroyd's history Innovation:

"Mussolini made short work of his political opposition, altering the electoral law to his party's advantage...he then proceeded to suppress all other political parties and non-Fascist news sources, and locked up political dissenters. By these means, and with the connivance of the elite, Mussolini established a totalitarian Fascist state...It also restricted personal freedom, with the threat of arrest to any intellectual who opposed Mussolini in word or deed."

Now, replace "Mussolini" with Biden, and "Fascist" with DEMOCRAT.

It all fits, doesn't it?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Innovation-History-England-VI-Book-ebook/dp/B08YZ5M9RF/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1644714275&sr=8-1

It does. :(
 
All you have to do is apply an overlay to history. DEMOCRATS are incapable of originality. They are capable of committing monstrosity today in emulation of yesteryear's tyranny.

Like I say, the nazis won wwII

the 'scientific improvement of the species' and the murder that goes with it is considered "edgy".
 
:dunno:

When you're right, you're right.



That's the globalist rationale for their attitude toward dissenters, like the unvaccinated.

the b.i.s. in switzerland was behind hitler.

I bet czechoslovakia would have like the chance to "be neutral".

Hitler wanted a global empire, just like globalists.

He actually sucked at nationalism, considering he drove germany off a cliff.
 
Back
Top