Maybe you are not very bright. You seem confounded by my answers.Because you brought up clearly unimportant things, like the effectiveness of hitting kids with boards. I gave you a chance and now I am done wasting my time
Maybe you are not very bright. You seem confounded by my answers.Because you brought up clearly unimportant things, like the effectiveness of hitting kids with boards. I gave you a chance and now I am done wasting my time
Wrong answer. You and I both know you weren't talking about an institution allowing or disallowing a specific activity. Child abuse is not legal in the United States, but it still happens. There is no connection between morality and legality.Maybe you are not very bright. You seem confounded by my answers.
I thought you were saying they paddle people in the South. I wouldn't know.Wrong answer. You and I both know you weren't talking about an institution allowing or disallowing a specific activity. Child abuse is not legal in the United States, but it still happens. There is no connection between morality and legality.
Great. Then I was wrong. I am talking specifically about the two people involved. The adult and the child and the morality of the adult hitting a child with a board.I thought you were saying they paddle people in the South. I wouldn't know.
And I answered. I do not believe paddling is merely a sadistic pleasure in cruelty. Maybe it is, what do you think?Great. Then I was wrong. I am talking specifically about the two people involved. The adult and the child and the morality of the adult hitting a child with a board.
The question is whether or not it is moral and whether or not morality is subjective or objective.And I answered. I do not believe paddling is merely a sadistic pleasure in cruelty. Maybe it is, what do you think?
I answered. So, no need to keep asking a question after it is answered.The question is whether or not it is moral based on the impact on the child.
Lol..... You fooled me twice. Shame on you. You like to start playing dumb when a discussion is not going your way. I need to remember that.I answered. So, no need to keep asking a question after it is answered.
I genuinely have no idea what your question is. Are you claiming paddling is only for sadistic pleasure?Lol..... You fooled me twice. Shame on you.
Okay, you cannot debate.
the golden rule is the best distillation of true morality i've encountered.Those are both true, but Christian morality is neither.
but some are right and some are wrong in this case.Moral behavior. Take an example: In Niger, some practice clitorectomies. I don't know how prevalent it is today, but it is done.
Some think that is abuse. But the people doing it--the families themselves--don't see it as abusive.
The golden rule is great. If the whole world truly lived by it, we'd be a better world, but you're ignoring things like killing your new wife if you find out she's not a virgin, killing your kids if they talk back to you, slaughtering babies, killing your neighbor for working on Saturday etc.the golden rule is the best distillation of true morality i've encountered.
what's your gold standard?
nihilism?
those are all immoral.The golden rule is great. If the whole world truly lived by it, we'd be a better world, but you're ignoring things like killing your new wife if you find out she's not a virgin, killing your kids if they talk back to you, slaughtering babies, etc.
Based on what?those are all immoral.
morality.Based on what?
As determined by who?morality.
the turn about principle. or the golden rule.As determined by who?
How does the Golden Rule apply to a parent killing their child for arguing or someone killing their neighbor for working on Saturday when it's already been established that back talk and working on the Sabbath are immoral?the turn about principle. or the golden rule.
"how about we cut the head of your dick off, Mohammed you for that?"