Our spoiled nation

Cypress said:
I'm at that age where the world was supposed to have ended about six times by now, and America was supposed to have been driven off the cliff about eight times by now.

There were supposed to be about half a dozen raptures by now, too
Click to expand...

And Harris was supposed to be president. You are right--I think it is just an older generation characteristic. We all think the end of the world is near, the U. S. and economy will soon collapse, and everything was better back then.

I read old novels, history, and watch old movies and they all said the same thing. "We used to leave our doors unlocked but not now." I read Thomas Jefferson biographies and he was very critical of the youth of his day.

I'm not worried about a civil war--we would be too lazy or busy to show up (like many militia members during the American revolution).
 
Flash said:
And Harris was supposed to be president. You are right--I think it is just an older generation characteristic. We all think the end of the world is near, the U. S. and economy will soon collapse, and everything was better back then.

I read old novels, history, and watch old movies and they all said the same thing. "We used to leave our doors unlocked but not now." I read Thomas Jefferson biographies and he was very critical of the youth of his day.

I'm not worried about a civil war--we would be too lazy or busy to show up (like many militia members during the American revolution).
Click to expand...

If we have a civil war now, it won't be over secession.
Both sides want the entire nation.

Negotiated partition, at this point, would be a good way to AVOID a civil war.
I don't actually expect it, of course, but I'd love to see it happen.
 
Flash said:
And Harris was supposed to be president. You are right--I think it is just an older generation characteristic. We all think the end of the world is near, the U. S. and economy will soon collapse, and everything was better back then.

I read old novels, history, and watch old movies and they all said the same thing. "We used to leave our doors unlocked but not now." I read Thomas Jefferson biographies and he was very critical of the youth of his day.

I'm not worried about a civil war--we would be too lazy or busy to show up (like many militia members during the American revolution).
Click to expand...

but now they're actually putting the plans in place to starve everyone into a technocratic surveillance state, with eugenics as it's guiding principal.

it's a false alarm, until its a real alarm.

you dumb boomers are/ were trained for this.

moral relativism was your generations achievement, congratulations, fucksticks.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
that's extremely naive or apathetically ignorant. I see the younger generations and I realize that they will eventually destroy America and it's founding ideas. It wouldn't surprise me if they ask Britain to welcome them back as a colony
Click to expand...

Exactly what our parents and grandparents said about our generation. The 1960's saw an increase in crime, drugs, divorce, and teen birth rate. There was increasing distrust of government and lower voter turnout.

All those things have been declining since the 1990s except distrust in government and it has remained stable except for a brief increase in trust after 9/11. Voter turnout has seen a big increase due largely to more competitive elections.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we have a civil war now, it won't be over secession.
Both sides want the entire nation.

Negotiated partition, at this point, would be a good way to AVOID a civil war.
I don't actually expect it, of course, but I'd love to see it happen.
Click to expand...

no real people want civil war.

it's deep state delusional implant.

this system can still be fixed from within itself, through the normal procedures.

sorry marxist, your agitprop is an epic fail.

the divide and conqer has stalled out due to no fucks given.

:truestory:
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we have a civil war now, it won't be over secession.
Both sides want the entire nation.

Negotiated partition, at this point, would be a good way to AVOID a civil war.
I don't actually expect it, of course, but I'd love to see it happen.
Click to expand...

I would hate to live in either half--whether due to secession or negotiated.

There is no way to successfully divide the nation.
 
JesusAI said:
but now they're actually putting the plans in place to starve everyone into a technocratic surveillance state, with eugenics as it's guiding principal.

it's a false alarm, until its a real alarm.

you dumb boomers are/ were trained for this.

moral relativism was your generations achievement, congratulations, fucksticks.
Click to expand...

I'm not a boomer or believe the crazy conspiracy theories somebody told you about. They always turn out to be phony. The idea that somebody wants to starve us is just crazy and benefits no one.
 
Flash said:
I'm not a boomer or believe the crazy conspiracy theories somebody told you about. They always turn out to be phony. The idea that somebody wants to starve us is just crazy and benefits no one.
Click to expand...

environmentalists always talk about population reduction and green policy to make sure it happens.

the war on fuel is a war on humanity at large.

:truestory:
 
Flash said:
I would hate to live in either half--whether due to secession or negotiated.

There is no way to successfully divide the nation.
Click to expand...

I, in contrast, would love to live in a nation where red state politics had no impact on our laws, tax codes, and values.
They're totally incompatible with Boston.
We could maintain normal diplomatic relations as trade partners and get along much better than we do now.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I, in contrast, would love to live in a nation where red state politics had no impact on our laws, tax codes, and values.
They're totally incompatible with Boston.
We could maintain normal diplomatic relations as trade partners and get along much better than we do now.
Click to expand...

nice capitulation to the ccp, globalist fascist dillhole.
 
Yakuda said:
Theocracy??? Do you people just use words without any regard for what they mean? As I write that I know the the answer is, "Yes" but I want to play along. What leads you to think a theocracy would have resulted? I can't wait for this.

You people do prefer the tyranny of the majority dont you? Is the name Tocqueville familiar to you at all?
Click to expand...

The far right - which those rioters largely represented - have been veering toward Christian nationalism.

Like I said previously, some Americans would have more freedom w/ the government they'd create. Many would have less.

I know all about the tyranny of the majority. Which, fortunately, our founders also understood - and put so many checks & balances in our system so as to make it an impossibility.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
is that your issue, then? you've lost interest in yourself?
Click to expand...

No, DtM, but you've made it clear you believe all shorts of violent, wacky shit. Why did you remove your "Threeper" tag? Skeered? LOL

Is the reason because the reality of losing your middle-class job, middle-class home and middle-class family by becoming a ward of the State too disturbing for you?

6tcsg1.jpg
 
Doc Dutch said:
No, DtM, but you've made it clear you believe all shorts of violent, wacky shit. Why did you remove your "Threeper" tag? Skeered? LOL

Is the reason because the reality of losing your middle-class job, middle-class home and middle-class family by becoming a ward of the State too disturbing for you?
Click to expand...

I accept your concession
 
Doc Dutch said:
Of course you do, DtM. You think the US government is run by Jews and you live a fantasy from the Turner Diaries. Why would you not believe you've won something here?
Click to expand...

making more false claims. that was completely expected. obviously you're trying to cover up your own racist views
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top