Pam strikes out, again, is there any competent Trump appointee

archives

Verified User

“Justice Department again fails to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James”​

“A grand jury declined for a second time in a week to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday in another major blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to prosecute the president’s political opponents.”

“The repeated failures amounted to a stunning rebuke of prosecutors’ bid to resurrect a criminal case President Donald Trump pressured them to bring, and hinted at a growing public leeriness of the administration’s retribution campaign.”

“A grand jury rejection is an unusual circumstance in any case, but is especially stinging for a Justice Department that has been steadfast in its determination to seek revenge against Trump foes like James and former FBI Director James Comey. On separate occasions, citizens have heard the government’s evidence against James and have come away underwhelmed”


Wasn’t it Trump’s man Justice Scalia who said anyone could get a Grand Jury to indict a baloney sandwich

This is the third attempt rejected, you’d think there is some applicable legal ethics that implies enough is enough, but Pam will surely try it again, even if she has to create her own “evidence,” the Messiah demands it
 

“Justice Department again fails to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James”​

“A grand jury declined for a second time in a week to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday in another major blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to prosecute the president’s political opponents.”

“The repeated failures amounted to a stunning rebuke of prosecutors’ bid to resurrect a criminal case President Donald Trump pressured them to bring, and hinted at a growing public leeriness of the administration’s retribution campaign.”

“A grand jury rejection is an unusual circumstance in any case, but is especially stinging for a Justice Department that has been steadfast in its determination to seek revenge against Trump foes like James and former FBI Director James Comey. On separate occasions, citizens have heard the government’s evidence against James and have come away underwhelmed”


Wasn’t it Trump’s man Justice Scalia who said anyone could get a Grand Jury to indict a baloney sandwich

This is the third attempt rejected, you’d think there is some applicable legal ethics that implies enough is enough, but Pam will surely try it again, even if she has to create her own “evidence,” the Messiah demands it
Yeah, all the others, Anchovies. I reckon Bondi will have to go and a competent put in to replace her. I am disappoint.
I thought she could do things. It appears I was mistaken.
 
I think Leticia James is going to come out of this way ahead, her name profile has been skyrocketing, and she is a warrior who stood up to Trump and won!

When you make up charges against someone, our justice system usually works.

Can you imagine I had a grand jury refused Jack Smith request to invite the president even once? They would still be screaming.
 

“Justice Department again fails to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James”​

“A grand jury declined for a second time in a week to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday in another major blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to prosecute the president’s political opponents.”

“The repeated failures amounted to a stunning rebuke of prosecutors’ bid to resurrect a criminal case President Donald Trump pressured them to bring, and hinted at a growing public leeriness of the administration’s retribution campaign.”

“A grand jury rejection is an unusual circumstance in any case, but is especially stinging for a Justice Department that has been steadfast in its determination to seek revenge against Trump foes like James and former FBI Director James Comey. On separate occasions, citizens have heard the government’s evidence against James and have come away underwhelmed”


Wasn’t it Trump’s man Justice Scalia who said anyone could get a Grand Jury to indict a baloney sandwich

This is the third attempt rejected, you’d think there is some applicable legal ethics that implies enough is enough, but Pam will surely try it again, even if she has to create her own “evidence,” the Messiah demands it
Absolute incompetency. They are all in over their heads.
 
Trump is winning. He does not need to win the cases. They are vindictive prosecutions designed to make his chosen victim miserable and spend money on lawyers. Trump is a grade A prick and he shows it every day.

He certainly gets the MAGATs close to climax with these stunts. Now they can blame "activist judges" for the failure to "get" James and Comey, who I hope sue the administration for baseless charges and harassment.
 
He certainly gets the MAGATs close to climax with these stunts. Now they can blame "activist judges" for the failure to "get" James and Comey, who I hope sue the administration for baseless charges and harassment.
Everyone is against him.

He could not get an indictment to stick against Comey or James, but Smith got one to stick against him!
 
Back
Top