Guess it depends on what the charges are. If they are different than the ones he was indicted for (and later pled guilty to), it's not double jeopardy, if my understanding is correct.
I see that as well. The lingering question for me then is why the heck did he and his lawyers all agree it was good for him to plead guilty ahead of time to those state charges up front?
I guess there's more to this.
Original federal charges:
Fraud/bank fraud (income, debt and the nature of his real estate properties)
False income tax returns (failing to report this income on his income tax returns, and falsely claiming he had no authority over those foreign accounts)
Failed to file foreign bank account reports (known as FBARs, with the Treasury Department to disclose his control over his overseas accounts)
New state charges:
Attempted mortgage/bank fraud, conspiracy, falsifying business records and residential mortgage fraud, falsifying business records of overseas bank accounts
They're basically the same.
These newer charges were all what he was being investigated for (by N.Y. no less) back around March of 2017. This must have been when he pled guilty ahead of time.
Manafort's legal team is likely to challenge the new indictment on double-jeopardy grounds, arguing the charges brought against Manafort in New York are the same as the ones the former Trump campaign chairman went on trial for in Virginia.