Pence now showing his "closet racist" tendencies as well.

To be fair, I'm not against holding cops more accountable. I just think we've lately started to shift things in a direction where cops can't legally defend themselves. The Rayshard Brooks shooting seems pretty understandable given his attempt to taser one of the cops, but Atlanta's government has given into the mob's demands. The media has unfortunately turned a significant portion of that population into mindless thugs.

The problem is that after the attempt, the cop is no longer in danger. So we'll see how it plays out in the courtroom.
 
An ad hominem attacks the opponent rather than their argument or position. You stated, "LOL. You have no idea what that means." That is an ad hominen.

Nope. It's an observation, not an attack.

It was the way you phrased your response that made it a combination complex question fallacy and red herring. That has nothing to do with your intent. Since I am not a mind reader, I can only go with what's presented.

Then I guess I should be more clear. SxS seemed to understand the question. Then gave me the proper answer.

Another ad hominem. I pointed out the fallacy in the construction of your response, nothing more.

Nope. Observation.

I have problems with the BLM narrative because it is hyper-political and supports an agenda rather than looking critically, and rationally at factual evidence. That makes it propaganda more than a persuasive argument.

See? That wasn't so hard, was it? And no this one is not an ad hominem.
 
Forget it, T.A. Perhaps you're right. I should have been more clear. But by now it should be clear.

SxS said that some aren't lying, just believing the narrative wrong.
 
The problem is that after the attempt, the cop is no longer in danger. So we'll see how it plays out in the courtroom.

Brooks had a long history of violence, so that lends credence to the idea that he was putting up quite a fight. What was shown in the bodycam footage was already pretty intense.
 
Brooks had a long history of violence, so that lends credence to the idea that he was putting up quite a fight. What was shown in the bodycam footage was already pretty intense.

Not to mention I heard it said that this cop knew this creep well enough to know what to do.
 
To be fair, I'm not against holding cops more accountable. I just think we've lately started to shift things in a direction where cops can't legally defend themselves. The Rayshard Brooks shooting seems pretty understandable given his attempt to taser one of the cops, but Atlanta's government has given into the mob's demands. The media has unfortunately turned a significant portion of that population into mindless thugs.

Cops can't defend themselves? WTF. Have you got examples? Cops wear riot gear, have guns ,tear gas and clubs while wearing kevlar. Poor babies, how will the get along? They have an overwhelming advantage is every incident.
 
Cops can't defend themselves? WTF. Have you got examples? Cops wear riot gear, have guns ,tear gas and clubs while wearing kevlar. Poor babies, how will the get along? They have an overwhelming advantage is every incident.

Legally defend themselves. Yes, they have the equipment to take care of business, but when you have politically motivated DAs that pander to mindless mobs (like what's happening in Atlanta right now), then cops basically go on strike, as they should.

Honestly, I hope Atlanta makes the same mistake as Minneapolis. If we can get both Atlanta and Minneapolis to go full Mad Max, it will help illustrate just how insane BLM and the left in general have become.
 
Legally defend themselves. Yes, they have the equipment to take care of business, but when you have politically motivated DAs that pander to mindless mobs (like what's happening in Atlanta right now), then cops basically go on strike, as they should.

Honestly, I hope Atlanta makes the same mistake as Minneapolis. If we can get both Atlanta and Minneapolis to go full Mad Max, it will help illustrate just how insane BLM and the left in general have become.

LOL
 
I truly doubt it. We have survived through worse times like the 60's.

I can agree with that, although the 60s didn't involve disbanding the police. We also didn't experience a pandemic of this magnitude at that time either. 2020 has been one hell of a year.
 
I can agree with that, although the 60s didn't involve disbanding the police. We also didn't experience a pandemic of this magnitude at that time either. 2020 has been one hell of a year.

Yeah. Well one city disbanded the police with no problem before. Can't remember when and where.

But we'll shall see. I wonder if the second wave is going to be much worse.
 
Yeah. Well one city disbanded the police with no problem before. Can't remember when and where.

But we'll shall see. I wonder if the second wave is going to be much worse.

Sandy Springs, GA technically did this, although all it amounted to was replacing the cops with a private security force.

Either way, even if the second wave ends up being about the same as the first, cities with shutdown orders and few (or no) police are going to be fucked. Then, add the fact that private gun sales are at a historic high, and you have a perfect recipe for basically The Purge.
 
Sandy Springs, GA technically did this, although all it amounted to was replacing the cops with a private security force.

Either way, even if the second wave ends up being about the same as the first, cities with shutdown orders and few (or no) police are going to be fucked. Then, add the fact that private gun sales are at a historic high, and you have a perfect recipe for basically The Purge.

I love that movie.

Anyway, that's essentially what a few people want - replacing the cops with something better. Generally they just want to spend more on other essential services and not much on unnecessary arsenal and militarized police. Improving the training and programs and such.

They're just tired of seeing so many people being hurt unnecessarily.
 
I love that movie.

Anyway, that's essentially what a few people want - replacing the cops with something better. Generally they just want to spend more on other essential services and not much on unnecessary arsenal and militarized police. Improving the training and programs and such.

They're just tired of seeing so many people being hurt unnecessarily.

There are aspects to having a private security alternative that are better. Granted, that does tend to favor the wealthy more than the current system.

If it were just a matter of better training, I'd be ok with that, but BLM seems to be making much more extreme demands than that.

Another ridiculous notion coming from them and others is ending prisons or releasing "non-violent" offenders en masse.

One thing people don't like to talk about is that there is evidence that the reason why violent and property crimes have consistently fallen since the 80s in most areas is because of the high incarceration rate. I'm not saying a police state is a good thing, but this connection is somewhat disturbing.

It essentially implies that a significant portion of the public is prone towards crime in general, and that poverty really has little to do with it.

For example, West Virginia is poorer today than it was in the 60s, but crime is down. Incarceration is higher, however. Many areas fit this situation.
 
Another ridiculous notion coming from them and others is ending prisons

I have heard that but who said that and what context?

For example, West Virginia is poorer today than it was in the 60s, but crime is down. Incarceration is higher, however. Many areas fit this situation.

I used to live in WV. The reason (I believe) that the reason for the state becoming poorer is because of the decline of coal mining.
 
I have heard that but who said that and what context?

This is one of the most recent examples: https://www.newsweek.com/list-deman...ck-doctors-black-patients-end-prisons-1510323

"The movement calls for abolishing imprisonment and replacing it with restorative/transformative accountability programs." Some of the other things mentioned I'm not necessarily against, but a lot of leftists seem to have this idea that everyone can be redeemed. That's pretty naive.

I can see making certain offenses eligible for "restorative" programs, but certainly not violent offenders.

I used to live in WV. The reason (I believe) that the reason for the state becoming poorer is because of the decline of coal mining.

Makes sense. But if we go with conventional progressive thinking, the crime should be higher there now, and yet it isn't.

A much stronger correlation seems to involve cultural standards. Some cultures react more violently to their surroundings than others.
 
Back
Top