I'll once again attempt to make it simple for you.
All legal votes will be counted.
All illegal votes will not.
Entiendes?
Philadelphia update!!! Judge orders observers allowed in counting! still Denied acces
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
I'll once again attempt to make it simple for you.
All legal votes will be counted.
All illegal votes will not.
Entiendes?
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that they will, Earl.
Pardon me if I don't substitute your judgement for those counting the votes.
Nope I'm heading to Nevada to head off the cabal of Trump secret treaty makers with a show of liberal armament.
The order by Judge Cannon that you posted is prima facie evidence that a remedy to the observer distance was required
The rest will be in the Supreme Court filing.
It is not evidence of all your claims, though.
The Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeals twice already. They may do so again.
Indeed they did.
Why do cheating Democrats have to be prevented from cheating, by the courts?
cry all you want.
You lost. Y’all are losers. And worse, you’re sore losers. Whiners.
you're cunts
What was the basis for the appeals...which violations?
Because that's how our system works.
Take a hike, cabron.
Which appeals are you asking about?
Can you look up the pleadings, or must I do it for you?
We agree. So when the votes have been counted and Biden wins, you will accept the result, right?
Yes, I know that ...I was referencing the necessity for the courts to force the cheating Democrats not to cheat.
Wouldn't this presuppose the fact that Democrats cheat...if they have to be be forced by the courts not to cheat.
Yes, for all legal votes...not for illegal votes...ballot stuffing etc.
No. A presupposition of wrongdoing is neither a requirement or a hindrance to civil litigation.
