Pocahontas challenge

So an "expert" swabbed her cheek. Same test. :shrug:[/QUOTE. That is often how it is done and it is proof in courts because the science has been proven. I agree she was proven part indian. Glad you admit it now.
Not the same test. Dr. Bustamante took the sample . The doctor analyzing the sample did not know it belonged to Warren. They were very careful. So yes, she is part Indian.
 
So an "expert" swabbed her cheek. Same test. :shrug:[/QUOTE. That is often how it is done and it is proof in courts because the science has been proven. I agree she was proven part indian. Glad you admit it now.
Not the same test. Dr. Bustamante took the sample . The doctor analyzing the sample did not know it belonged to Warren. They were very careful. So yes, she is part Indian.

She is not an Indian. Trump said that if he did challenge Pocahontas to take a dna test during a future debate for a chance to direct a million dollars to a charity, the test would be simply to find out if she was an Indian. Not part Indian or 1/1000 part Indian, just simply an Indian. Trump has yet to offer Pocahontas the opportunity to do this challenge, but I doubt he ever will now that she has already proven that she is white.
 
She is not an Indian. Trump said that if he did challenge Pocahontas to take a dna test during a future debate for a chance to direct a million dollars to a charity, the test would be simply to find out if she was an Indian. Not part Indian or 1/1000 part Indian, just simply an Indian. Trump has yet to offer Pocahontas the opportunity to do this challenge, but I doubt he ever will now that she has already proven that she is white.

All the test did was prove that she is whiter than the average white dude.
 
The test revealed that she is not an Indian.

keep repeating the obvious. Exactly who said she was an Indian.? She said she had Indian heritage and she proved it. She has Indian blood as 5 genomes showed. That is what the test was for and it proved her Indian ancestry.
 
keep repeating the obvious. Exactly who said she was an Indian.? She said she had Indian heritage and she proved it. She has Indian blood as 5 genomes showed. That is what the test was for and it proved her Indian ancestry.

All the test did was prove that she is whiter than the average white dude.
 
keep repeating the obvious. Exactly who said she was an Indian.? She said she had Indian heritage and she proved it. She has Indian blood as 5 genomes showed. That is what the test was for and it proved her Indian ancestry.

What was the exact wording of Trump's hypothetical challenge to pocahontas? Is there something about Trump's exact wording that you are avoiding?
 
She is not an Indian. Trump said that if he did challenge Pocahontas to take a dna test during a future debate for a chance to direct a million dollars to a charity, the test would be simply to find out if she was an Indian. Not part Indian or 1/1000 part Indian, just simply an Indian. Trump has yet to offer Pocahontas the opportunity to do this challenge, but I doubt he ever will now that she has already proven that she is white.

That is Trumps inaccurate portrayal of what she said. She did not say she was an Indian, but she had Indian blood. her brother said he was told his grandfather was part delaware ,a tiny bitty bit, way back,. The DNA test proved she and brother were absolutely correct. Who the hell thought she was an Indian as you are trying to define it. She made no such claim.
 
nordberg did not move the goalposts.....he melted them dowm and made belly button rings out of them......

No, you assholes did. I repeated exactly what she claimed. Show me one incident where she claimed she was an Indian or even a large part. Her and her brother both said a little bit way back. Trump made the big deal out of it. But all you have to do is show me one cite, one quote where she said she was an indiuian or a large portion. Just one.
As usual, you are wrong.
 
What was the exact wording of Trump's hypothetical challenge to pocahontas? Is there something about Trump's exact wording that you are avoiding?

No hypothetical, unless you are saying he was lying or talking out of his ass. He made the deal. Fact is there was no discussion ever about her being mostly or all Indian. That was never the claim until he lost the bet, then he is trying to loophole his way out. Perhaps he does not have the money. Her name is not pocahantas.
 
Trump was never throwing a DNA kit at her and no it does not cost a couple bucks. This is a crappy defense, it that is what you think it is. The point was to prove her Indian blood and she did it. They cost 69 bucks.

I posted a link with a video of Trump actually making the statements in question. Only in progtard land does proof = crappy defense.
 
Liz: "I am a blond haired blue eyed woman of color. I'm 0.01 percent native american. That's .09 percent lower than the average american. I guess americans are all people of color.
 

This is what the hill says he said, not what he really did say in its full and correct context. Trump's quote in the hill article was clipped short to modify the context. Trump never made a deal with her, and was discussing a hypothetical debate that he might have with her at some future date where he would offer her such a deal. Why are you afraid of the full and correct context of what Trump really did say?
 
From the link:
"I will give you a million dollars, to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you’re an Indian,"(Trump said).

She took the test, it did not show she's an Indian.

This is not all he said. This is all the left wants people to think he said, but he did not actually offer her that deal. He presented that to a rally crowd in fun as a hypothetical deal that he might make in some future debate.
 
"I will give you a million dollars, to your favorite charity, if you take a DNA test that shows you were born gay"
 
But all you have to do is show me one cite, one quote where she said she was an indiuian or a large portion. Just one.
As usual, you are wrong.

what was your response to the photo posted on one of these threads stating she had status as a minority.....(thats why I hate multiple threads.....you can never find crap back when you need it.....
 

Lefties seem to require the media to filter and format news for them instead of just looking at what really did happen. Nobody cares what "The Hill" says Trump said, what matters is what Trump really did say. Below is a video of what Trump really did say, not what the media has edited for lefty eyes.

Look at what Trump says at 1 minute mark in the video. He says: "let's say I'm debating Pocahontas..." This is where he sets a hypothetical setting for some point in the future. Also, note that he is not addressing her, he is talking about her to his crowd.

Now, look at the 1:25 mark in the video. "and in the middle of the debate,..." Here, he is describing the proposed time in the hypothetical debate where he would "toss her a kit". Note that this is only a hypothetical debate that has not occurred, and that he has not made any commitments to Pocahontas. He has only joked with his rally crowd about what he might do in a hypothetical debate in the future.

 
Back
Top