Pocahontas challenge

It is interesting that rightys can delude themselves because, like Trump, they can never say they got it wrong. This thread shows those who suck up to Trump will do it on everything, big and small. Trump made the fucking deal. He did not say anything about changing the rules. If she showed 10 percent, he and all the posters here would have decided 12 percent was enough. Anything else was not enough. Nothing was going to be enough. She said a trace and she showed it. He lost.

I see you evaded posting where and when the deal would be made, as specified in the video in post 39 of what Trump really did say, in its full and correct context. Trump really did specify where and when the deal would be made, and you really can see it, but you will never be able to post it here. You will have to evade answering this, since you are a lefty, and that's what lefties do. Go on now, post your evasion...
 
It's lefty-like for me to not check every single post in this thread?

Yes, it is. There aren't that many posts in this thread. Lefties tend to have context issues, and issues with following a conversation. They love their deceitfully edited sound bytes instead.
 
She said a trace of Indian[
LIE. She said she WAS "American Indian". She said so on her State Bar of TX registration card. She also said so in numerous other situations around the that time period. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...27df76-2962-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html

and the DNA test proved it.
It proved that she had VERY trace amounts of American Indian heritage... Trace amounts to the point of irrelevancy.

It has nothing to do with your Hitlerian heritage.
German ≠ Hitlerian... And once again, you "pulled a lefty" and completely missed the point. The point is that I don't make claim to a heritage that is 0.1% of what I am. Instead, I make claim to my most dominant heritage (or a few, if those few happen to have similar percentages). Doesn't that make more sense? Her 0.1% American Indian isn't even close to any sort of plurality, let alone the majority...

She was correct.
She was a liar.

Trump knew he lost,
One can't lose a hypothetical.

but also knew paying off would admit he was wrong.
The terms were not met. See the context.

He is not capable of doing that.
Lie.
 
Last edited:
It is interesting that rightys can delude themselves because, like Trump, they can never say they got it wrong.
How does one get a hypothetical wrong, exactly?

This thread shows those who suck up to Trump will do it on everything, big and small.
Nope. The topic of the thread is very specific. You're losing sight of the topic here...

Trump made the fucking deal.
He presented a hypothetical. That hypothetical never happened at a later date. No deal was made. No terms were met.

He did not say anything about changing the rules.
He didn't change any rules.

If she showed 10 percent, he and all the posters here would have decided 12 percent was enough.
Neither would be enough for me. At that point, one is either ignoring what they predominately are, or else they are a mixture of a whole bunch of things.

Anything else was not enough. Nothing was going to be enough.
Lie. 50%+ would have been enough for me.

She said a trace
LIE. She said she WAS American Indian.

and she showed it.
She showed that she had a trace amount of American Indian heritage, to the point of irrelevancy. 0.1% is not relevant.

Not possible to lose a hypothetical.
 
LIE. She said she WAS "American Indian". She said so on her State Bar of TX registration card. She also said so in numerous other situations around the that time period. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...27df76-2962-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html


It proved that she had VERY trace amounts of American Indian heritage... Trace amounts to the point of irrelevancy.


German ≠ Hitlerian... And once again, you "pulled a lefty" and completely missed the point. The point is that I don't make claim to a heritage that is 0.01% of what I am. Instead, I make claim to my most dominant heritage (or a few, if those few happen to have similar percentages). Doesn't that make more sense? Her 0.01% American Indian isn't even close to any sort of plurality, let alone the majority...


She was a liar.


One can't lose a hypothetical.


The terms were not met. See the context.


Lie.

He will have to evade acknowledging that he is now aware of when and where Trump said he would make the hypothetical deal in order to respond to anything else on this thread. He will either pretend continued ignorance, or he will simply disappear. I have found that if you corner a lefty in a place they can't get out of, they magically disappear.
 
He will have to evade acknowledging that he is now aware of when and where Trump said he would make the hypothetical deal in order to respond to anything else on this thread. He will either pretend continued ignorance, or he will simply disappear. I have found that if you corner a lefty in a place they can't get out of, they magically disappear.

Trace amounts are not irrelevant. That is your claim which is merely another example of your desperate right-wing slant and rabid defenses of Trump. She was exactly as promised. After the fact, you guys are making up new rules. That is what rightys do.
 
Trace amounts are not irrelevant.
Yes, they are.

In the context of one's race/heritage, 0.1% is completely irrelevant.

That is your claim which is merely another example of your desperate right-wing slant and rabid defenses of Trump.
No slant, no defenses. 0.1% is irrelevant.

She was exactly as promised.
LIE. She said that she WAS American Indian, as per the link which I provided to you. Stop evading. Stop lying. She is nowhere near 50%+ American Indian.

After the fact, you guys are making up new rules.
No, that is what YOU are doing. Inversion Fallacy.

That is what rightys do.
Inversion Fallacy.
 
Yes, they are.

In the context of one's race/heritage, 0.1% is completely irrelevant.


No slant, no defenses. 0.1% is irrelevant.


LIE. She said that she WAS American Indian, as per the link which I provided to you. Stop evading. Stop lying. She is nowhere near 50%+ American Indian.


No, that is what YOU are doing. Inversion Fallacy.


Inversion Fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy. You are misusing fallacies like a first-year introduction to logic student. Logics are no absolutes nor is there one for every occasion. deal with the content. Labelling everything is not doing that.
 
Warren was told by her family that she had a trace of Indian blood. It was about 5 generations back. Her DNA showed exactly that. Trump should have paid.
 
Fallacy fallacy.
That's what you're committing here, not me. Inversion Fallacy as well.

You are misusing fallacies like a first-year introduction to logic student.
Nope, that's what you are doing, not me. Inversion Fallacy.

Logics are no absolutes
A fallacy is a logic error. It works much like a math error does. There ARE proofs in both math and logic.

nor is there one for every occasion.
Stop committing fallacies and I will stop calling you out on them.

deal with the content.
I am. You simply don't like my answers, hence the whole dodging, evading, distracting, etc...

Labelling everything is not doing that.
Stop committing fallacies and I will stop calling them out.


0.1% is completely irrelevant in every way within the context of calling oneself a Native American. 0.1% Native American does not make one a Native American.
 
Warren was told by her family that she had a trace of Indian blood.
I don't know or care what she was told by her family. Irrelevant information.

It was about 5 generations back.
Okay.

Her DNA showed exactly that.
Yup.

Trump should have paid.
At this point, you are willfully and knowingly ignoring the context. Watch the video in post #39... Trump was joking with the crowd at one of his rallies. He presented a hypothetical situation, a situation which has yet to occur.
 
What makes lefties what they are is they do not have what it takes to seek out and find that video on the internet, then watch it carefully enough to vet what he really did say in it full and proper context. Lefties just listen to what the msm engineers and feeds them. When the msm extracts what Trump said from its context, they create fake news. The time and location where Trump would make the deal were right there in the video, but lefties need to omit it in order to engineer fake news that meets their political narrative.

If you claim the video exists, it's up to you to present it. When you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you.
The rest is NPC bullshit.
 
Yes, it is. There aren't that many posts in this thread. Lefties tend to have context issues, and issues with following a conversation. They love their deceitfully edited sound bytes instead.

The reason I'm asking for the video is because I want to be sure of the context before I take a stance. It sounds like the Trumpsters here are not valuing context or the word "lefty."
 
Back
Top