Terri4Trump
Verified User
........The point was to prove her Indian blood and she did it........
Lay off the crackpipe you moron
........The point was to prove her Indian blood and she did it........
It is interesting that rightys can delude themselves because, like Trump, they can never say they got it wrong. This thread shows those who suck up to Trump will do it on everything, big and small. Trump made the fucking deal. He did not say anything about changing the rules. If she showed 10 percent, he and all the posters here would have decided 12 percent was enough. Anything else was not enough. Nothing was going to be enough. She said a trace and she showed it. He lost.
It's lefty-like for me to not check every single post in this thread?
LIE. She said she WAS "American Indian". She said so on her State Bar of TX registration card. She also said so in numerous other situations around the that time period. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...27df76-2962-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.htmlShe said a trace of Indian[
It proved that she had VERY trace amounts of American Indian heritage... Trace amounts to the point of irrelevancy.and the DNA test proved it.
German ≠ Hitlerian... And once again, you "pulled a lefty" and completely missed the point. The point is that I don't make claim to a heritage that is 0.1% of what I am. Instead, I make claim to my most dominant heritage (or a few, if those few happen to have similar percentages). Doesn't that make more sense? Her 0.1% American Indian isn't even close to any sort of plurality, let alone the majority...It has nothing to do with your Hitlerian heritage.
She was a liar.She was correct.
One can't lose a hypothetical.Trump knew he lost,
The terms were not met. See the context.but also knew paying off would admit he was wrong.
Lie.He is not capable of doing that.
How does one get a hypothetical wrong, exactly?It is interesting that rightys can delude themselves because, like Trump, they can never say they got it wrong.
Nope. The topic of the thread is very specific. You're losing sight of the topic here...This thread shows those who suck up to Trump will do it on everything, big and small.
He presented a hypothetical. That hypothetical never happened at a later date. No deal was made. No terms were met.Trump made the fucking deal.
He didn't change any rules.He did not say anything about changing the rules.
Neither would be enough for me. At that point, one is either ignoring what they predominately are, or else they are a mixture of a whole bunch of things.If she showed 10 percent, he and all the posters here would have decided 12 percent was enough.
Lie. 50%+ would have been enough for me.Anything else was not enough. Nothing was going to be enough.
LIE. She said she WAS American Indian.She said a trace
She showed that she had a trace amount of American Indian heritage, to the point of irrelevancy. 0.1% is not relevant.and she showed it.
Not possible to lose a hypothetical.He lost.
LIE. She said she WAS "American Indian". She said so on her State Bar of TX registration card. She also said so in numerous other situations around the that time period. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...27df76-2962-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html
It proved that she had VERY trace amounts of American Indian heritage... Trace amounts to the point of irrelevancy.
German ≠ Hitlerian... And once again, you "pulled a lefty" and completely missed the point. The point is that I don't make claim to a heritage that is 0.01% of what I am. Instead, I make claim to my most dominant heritage (or a few, if those few happen to have similar percentages). Doesn't that make more sense? Her 0.01% American Indian isn't even close to any sort of plurality, let alone the majority...
She was a liar.
One can't lose a hypothetical.
The terms were not met. See the context.
Lie.
He will have to evade acknowledging that he is now aware of when and where Trump said he would make the hypothetical deal in order to respond to anything else on this thread. He will either pretend continued ignorance, or he will simply disappear. I have found that if you corner a lefty in a place they can't get out of, they magically disappear.
Yes, they are.Trace amounts are not irrelevant.
No slant, no defenses. 0.1% is irrelevant.That is your claim which is merely another example of your desperate right-wing slant and rabid defenses of Trump.
LIE. She said that she WAS American Indian, as per the link which I provided to you. Stop evading. Stop lying. She is nowhere near 50%+ American Indian.She was exactly as promised.
No, that is what YOU are doing. Inversion Fallacy.After the fact, you guys are making up new rules.
Inversion Fallacy.That is what rightys do.
Yes, they are.
In the context of one's race/heritage, 0.1% is completely irrelevant.
No slant, no defenses. 0.1% is irrelevant.
LIE. She said that she WAS American Indian, as per the link which I provided to you. Stop evading. Stop lying. She is nowhere near 50%+ American Indian.
No, that is what YOU are doing. Inversion Fallacy.
Inversion Fallacy.
That's what you're committing here, not me. Inversion Fallacy as well.Fallacy fallacy.
Nope, that's what you are doing, not me. Inversion Fallacy.You are misusing fallacies like a first-year introduction to logic student.
A fallacy is a logic error. It works much like a math error does. There ARE proofs in both math and logic.Logics are no absolutes
Stop committing fallacies and I will stop calling you out on them.nor is there one for every occasion.
I am. You simply don't like my answers, hence the whole dodging, evading, distracting, etc...deal with the content.
Stop committing fallacies and I will stop calling them out.Labelling everything is not doing that.
I don't know or care what she was told by her family. Irrelevant information.Warren was told by her family that she had a trace of Indian blood.
Okay.It was about 5 generations back.
Yup.Her DNA showed exactly that.
At this point, you are willfully and knowingly ignoring the context. Watch the video in post #39... Trump was joking with the crowd at one of his rallies. He presented a hypothetical situation, a situation which has yet to occur.Trump should have paid.
What makes lefties what they are is they do not have what it takes to seek out and find that video on the internet, then watch it carefully enough to vet what he really did say in it full and proper context. Lefties just listen to what the msm engineers and feeds them. When the msm extracts what Trump said from its context, they create fake news. The time and location where Trump would make the deal were right there in the video, but lefties need to omit it in order to engineer fake news that meets their political narrative.
It's lefty-like to dodge, deflect, divert, convert, ignore, or otherwise evade. Notice which of my two posts directed at you was your first priority? You evaded.
If you claim the video exists, it's up to you to present it. When you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you.
The rest is NPC bullshit.
You mean when I asked for this video you claim exists?
If you claim the video exists, it's up to you to present it. When you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you.
The rest is NPC bullshit.
Yes, it is. There aren't that many posts in this thread. Lefties tend to have context issues, and issues with following a conversation. They love their deceitfully edited sound bytes instead.
You mean when I asked for this video you claim exists?
Post #39. You've been told MULTIPLE times where the video is. Stop being a fucking moron.