Pocahontas challenge

The reason I'm asking for the video is because I want to be sure of the context before I take a stance.
Then check out the video. Post #39. It is right there. Stop being a moron and go check it out. It has also been clearly explained in other posts.

It sounds like the Trumpsters here are not valuing context or the word "lefty."
Projection Fallacy. YOU are the one doing this, not "Trumpsters".
 
In the post 39,which part of Trump's lies are we talking about? When he said she based her life on it? That is absolutely not true. The part when he talked about 2 dollars DNA kits, which do not exist? Maybe when he said as his rude self would do, he would throw the 2 oz kit at her? Why would he do that? It does not weigh 2 oz and throwing it at her would not prove her heritage, just Trump's jerk self acting up.
She said trace of Indian blood and proved it exactly as she said. She wins. Trump and rightys are now claiming some other percentage. She is as she claimed and Trump should pay. But he didn't have a million dollars. He lied about that too. Otherwise, he would not be robbing his charity.''Well, maybe he would that is the kind of person he is.
 
Not at all.
LIE.

I'm saying that I refuse to have an opinion on the issue until I see the full context.
And the full context has been nicely presented to you in post #39, yet you refuse to watch it. Why is this?

Because you're an NPC, you're just blindly siding with the Right.
Inversion Fallacy. This is YOU, not me. I have watched the video in post #39, YOU keep refusing to do so.
 
Nothing. Stop expecting others to do your homework for you, numb nuts... See Post #39.

If you make a claim, but then refuse to back it up, you're the one expecting others to do your homework for you.

I notice this is very common among Trumpsters. You'll say that Biden collaborated with Ukraine, or Ted Cruz's father killed JFK, then when asked for evidence, you'll say it's on the internet, go look it up!
 
Such as?
Which claim did I make and then not back up?

Post #85 of yours... I'm saying that I refuse to have an opinion on the issue until I see the full context.

You are not backing up this claim because you keep refusing to watch the video in post #39...
 
If you make a claim, but then refuse to back it up, you're the one expecting others to do your homework for you.
Inversion Fallacy.

I notice this is very common among Trumpsters.
Inversion Fallacy.

You'll say that Biden collaborated with Ukraine,
He did. There is video evidence of this from January 2018.

or Ted Cruz's father killed JFK,
???

then when asked for evidence, you'll say it's on the internet, go look it up!
No, it's been presented to you. Post #39.
 
Post #85 of yours... I'm saying that I refuse to have an opinion on the issue until I see the full context.

You are not backing up this claim because you keep refusing to watch the video in post #39...

He has watched the video in post 39, and he has read post 39 very carefully. He is just evading, the way lefties do. Gonzo has watched it and has read post 39 as well, he just uses a different method of evasion. He plays ignorant, but he is evading. I'll go ahead and re post #39 for these guys, but they will still evade.
 
I'm supposed to provide a video that you claim exists? For all I know, you're lying again.

Here you go, this is what you are evading, this is post 39 with the video. Go on now and evade like we know you will.

Lefties seem to require the media to filter and format news for them instead of just looking at what really did happen. Nobody cares what "The Hill" says Trump said, what matters is what Trump really did say. Below is a video of what Trump really did say, not what the media has edited for lefty eyes.

Look at what Trump says at 1 minute mark in the video. He says: "let's say I'm debating Pocahontas..." This is where he sets a hypothetical setting for some point in the future. Also, note that he is not addressing her, he is talking about her to his crowd.

Now, look at the 1:25 mark in the video. "and in the middle of the debate,..." Here, he is describing the proposed time in the hypothetical debate where he would "toss her a kit". Note that this is only a hypothetical debate that has not occurred, and that he has not made any commitments to Pocahontas. He has only joked with his rally crowd about what he might do in a hypothetical debate in the future.

 
Here you go, this is what you are evading, this is post 39 with the video. Go on now and evade like we know you will.

Wasn't evading anything, just waiting for you to back up your claim.

While Trump did fill that speech with lies and sexism, which I'm sure incels like you enjoyed, it's true that he wasn't actually promising anything.
 
Wasn't evading anything, just waiting for you to back up your claim.

While Trump did fill that speech with lies and sexism, which I'm sure incels like you enjoyed, it's true that he wasn't actually promising anything.

Interesting how you felt compelled to embed the answer into a never Trump rant. What were you trying to accomplish when you snuck the answer in with the never Trump rant? Did you think nobody would notice the answer hiding within the rant?

Congrats for staying here. Usually when I hold lefty feet to the fire for too long, they just disappear. You somehow stuck around long enough to answer a question where the answer is in favor of your political opponent, which is a very strange thing for a lefty to do. I think you deserve one of my special awards for this:

 
Back
Top